Skip to main content
Glama

Money You're Owed Catalog

Server Details

Informational Q&A: money owed to consumers (deposits, claims, unclaimed funds). No debt relief.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.3/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

Only one tool exists, so naming consistency is not an issue; the name 'answer_money_question' is descriptive.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for a 'catalog' is too few; users would expect multiple tools for browsing or searching different types of money-related information.

Completeness2/5

The single tool only answers questions, but there are no tools for listing categories, searching, or retrieving educational resources independently, leaving significant gaps.

Available Tools

1 tool
answer_money_questionAnswer a money-recovery questionA
Read-only
Inspect

Look up verified, source-cited facts and a linked educational resource for a consumer money-recovery question (security deposits, denied refunds, denied insurance/warranty claims, unclaimed property). Read-only lookup: it does not collect personal data, make payments, or change anything.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
questionYesThe consumer's question in plain language, e.g. 'my landlord kept my security deposit'
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds value by explicitly stating that the tool does not collect personal data, make payments, or change anything—context beyond the annotations. This effectively clarifies the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two concise sentences. The first sentence efficiently states the purpose and scope with examples; the second clarifies behavioral constraints. No unnecessary words, and important information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (1 parameter, no output schema, no sibling tools), the description provides complete context. It covers the domain, the type of answers provided, and the read-only nature. No gaps remain for an agent to safely invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already covers 100% of the parameter with a clear description. The tool description adds only a brief example phrase ('e.g. 'my landlord kept my security deposit''), which provides minimal additional meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate given high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: looking up verified facts and educational resources for consumer money-recovery questions. It specifies the domain (security deposits, denied refunds, etc.) and uses a specific verb 'look up' combined with a resource type. No sibling tools to differentiate from, but it is highly specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While there are no explicit when-not-to-use instructions or alternatives (since no siblings), the description clearly implies when to use the tool: for consumer money-recovery questions. The read-only clarification helps set expectations. Slightly limited exclusions prevent a perfect score.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources