Mobbin
Server Details
Search real-world UI & UX design references for mobile apps, web apps, and websites with Mobbin.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 99.9% over 64 days
- OAuth
- Works in Glama
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
- URL
- Repository
- mobbin/mobbin-mcp-server
- GitHub Stars
- 58
- Server Listing
- Mobbin MCP Server
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools target distinct content types — multi-step flows, individual UI screens, and website sections — which are mostly easy to tell apart. There is mild conceptual overlap (a flow contains screens, and sections can resemble screens), but the descriptions clarify the boundaries well enough.
All three tools follow a perfectly consistent verb_noun pattern (search_flows, search_screens, search_sections). The shared 'search_' prefix makes the family relationship obvious and predictable.
Three tools is on the lean side but reasonable for a focused search-driven design-inspiration service. Each tool maps to a genuine content category, so none feels redundant or unearned.
The surface covers search across three content types but offers no retrieval by ID, browsing, or collection operations. For a reference library, the lack of any direct get/lookup tool is a notable gap that limits non-search workflows.
Available Tools
3 toolssearch_flowsSearch FlowsARead-onlyInspect
Search Mobbin for multi-step user flows (e.g. onboarding, checkout) using natural language. Returns evenly-spaced preview images inline along with metadata for each flow, including per-screen previews. Examine the returned images to understand each flow's actual content — do not describe screens based solely on metadata. Inline images are low-res previews for you to read, not for the user. Each result's image_url is the high-resolution image. Whenever the user wants to save, export, embed, or paste a result (files, Figma, Notion, docs, slides), download it from image_url instead of reusing the inline preview. Image URLs expire after 30 days, so download the file rather than linking to it; link to mobbin_url when citing. On hosts that support MCP Apps, also renders an interactive gallery of the results.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number for paginating through results. Maximum 20. | |
| limit | No | Maximum number of flows to return. Lower limits are recommended to manage context size. | |
| query | Yes | Describe one user journey in plain language — the steps and what you'd see along the way. Be specific; detail helps. Good: "onboarding with personalization steps", "checkout with payment method selection". Avoid: combining multiple flows (search separately), negations, vague style words, disconnected keyword lists. Name a specific app to filter results to it (e.g. "Duolingo onboarding"). Do not include platform (ios/web) — use the dedicated parameter. | |
| platform | Yes | Platform to search. | |
| output_tool | No | The product the results go into next, not a later step, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. | |
| task_intent | No | One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. Write it in English even when the conversation is in another language. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data. | |
| image_format | No | Image format. Use jpg if your client does not support webp. | webp |
| output_destination | No | What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, also when looking up examples to base it on first, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| page | Yes | 1-based page number of search results. |
| flows | Yes | |
| query | Yes | The natural language query used for this search. |
| has_next_page | Yes | Whether more pages of results are available. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Goes well past the readOnly/destructive annotations: inline images are low-res previews meant for the agent, `image_url` holds the high-res version, URLs expire after 30 days so files must be downloaded rather than hot-linked, and `mobbin_url` is the citation target. It also discloses that an interactive gallery renders on MCP Apps hosts.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, followed by a logical sequence: previews, high-res download, expiry, citation, gallery. It is long at roughly eight sentences, but each one carries a distinct instruction about handling the returned images.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a search tool with an output schema, annotations and a fully documented 8-parameter schema, the definition covers result handling completely. The only missing piece is explicit sibling routing against search_screens and search_sections, which nothing else in the structured data supplies.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and the schema already documents query, platform, output_tool, task_intent and output_destination in depth, so the baseline is 3. The description adds return-field names (`image_url`, `mobbin_url`) but no parameter semantics beyond what the schema supplies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Search Mobbin for multi-step user flows') with concrete examples (onboarding, checkout), so the agent knows exactly what comes back. It does not explicitly differentiate itself from the siblings search_screens and search_sections, leaving the flows-vs-screens routing to inference.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives clear operational context: use natural language, examine returned images rather than trusting metadata, and download from `image_url` whenever the user wants to save, export, embed or paste. It never states when to prefer this tool over search_screens or search_sections, which is the main gap.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_screensSearch ScreensARead-onlyInspect
Search Mobbin for UI screens using natural language. Returns matching screens with inline images and metadata. Examine the returned images to understand each screen's actual content — do not describe or summarize screens based solely on metadata. Each screen has a mobbin_url — the canonical Mobbin link for that screen. When you present results to the user, ALWAYS cite each screen you mention as a markdown link to its mobbin_url so the user can open it on Mobbin. Inline images are low-res previews for you to read, not for the user. Each result's image_url is the high-resolution image. Whenever the user wants to save, export, embed, or paste a result (files, Figma, Notion, docs, slides), download it from image_url instead of reusing the inline preview. Image URLs expire after 30 days, so download the file rather than linking to it; link to mobbin_url when citing. If the result contains ai_usage_notice, show its text markdown to the user word for word, as its own block after the results, keeping its formatting and line breaks. Do not paraphrase, shorten, or merge it with other text. On hosts that support MCP Apps, also renders an interactive gallery of the results.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mode | No | Search mode. "standard" returns results with low latency. "deep" uses an AI-powered pipeline that interprets intent and scores each candidate for relevance, keeping the strong matches — ideal for nuanced queries. "fast" is a deprecated alias for "standard" and will be removed in a future version — use "standard" instead. | deep |
| limit | No | Maximum number of screens to return. Higher number of screens returned causes increased context usage. | |
| query | Yes | Describe one screen in plain language — the UI elements you'd see and how they relate. Be specific; detail helps. Good: "login screen with biometric authentication", "checkout page with promo code field and Apple Pay button". Avoid: combining multiple screens/intents (search separately), negations ("without ads"), vague style words ("modern", "clean"), disconnected keyword lists. Name a specific app to filter results to it (e.g. "Spotify now-playing screen"). Do not include platform (ios/web) — use the dedicated parameter. | |
| platform | Yes | Platform to search | |
| output_tool | No | The product the results go into next, not a later step, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. | |
| task_intent | No | One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. Write it in English even when the conversation is in another language. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data. | |
| image_format | No | Image format. Use jpg if your client does not support webp. | webp |
| exclude_screen_ids | No | Screen IDs to exclude from results | |
| output_destination | No | What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, also when looking up examples to base it on first, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | The natural language query used for this search. |
| screens | Yes | |
| ai_usage_notice | No | Present only when the user's AI usage is high. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare this is a safe, read-only, closed-world call, and the description adds substantial behavior beyond them: inline images are low-res previews only, `image_url` is the high-res asset, image URLs expire after 30 days, and results may carry an `ai_usage_notice` that must be echoed verbatim. It even discloses that MCP Apps hosts render an interactive gallery.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loaded with purpose and return shape, then ordered instructions; every sentence carries an actionable directive rather than filler. It is dense and runs as a single long paragraph, which slightly hurts scanability for a 9-parameter tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return-value explanation is unnecessary, and the description instead covers the tricky parts an agent would otherwise get wrong: asset type selection, link expiry, citation format, and verbatim notice handling. Given the tool's complexity, nothing essential is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already carries full parameter documentation, including mode, limit, query heuristics, platform, output_tool and output_destination. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ("Search Mobbin for UI screens using natural language") plus the return format ("matching screens with inline images and metadata"). The resource is distinct from the sibling tools' resources (flows, sections), so an agent can disambiguate without opening schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives strong contextual guidance on result handling (cite `mobbin_url`, download from `image_url`, do not reuse inline previews, surface `ai_usage_notice` verbatim), which is clear usage direction. It does not, however, name the sibling alternatives (search_flows, search_sections) or state when to prefer them, so it falls short of explicit alternative routing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_sectionsSearch SectionsARead-onlyInspect
Search Mobbin for website sections (e.g. About, Pricing, Footer) using natural language. Returns section images inline along with metadata. Examine the returned images to understand each section's actual content — do not describe or summarize sections based solely on metadata. Inline images are low-res previews for you to read, not for the user. Each result's image_url is the high-resolution image. Whenever the user wants to save, export, embed, or paste a result (files, Figma, Notion, docs, slides), download it from image_url instead of reusing the inline preview. Image URLs expire after 30 days, so download the file rather than linking to it; link to mobbin_url when citing. On hosts that support MCP Apps, also renders an interactive gallery of the results.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number for paginating through results. | |
| limit | No | Maximum number of sections to return. Higher number of sections returned causes increased context usage. | |
| query | Yes | Describe one website section in plain language — the content and elements you'd see. Be specific; detail helps. Good: "pricing page with plan comparison table", "hero section with signup form". Avoid: combining multiple sections (search separately), negations, vague style words, disconnected keyword lists. | |
| output_tool | No | The product the results go into next, not a later step, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. | |
| task_intent | No | One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. Write it in English even when the conversation is in another language. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data. | |
| image_format | No | Image format. Use jpg if your client does not support webp. | webp |
| output_destination | No | What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, also when looking up examples to base it on first, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| page | Yes | 1-based page number of this batch of search results. |
| query | Yes | The natural language query used for this search. |
| sections | Yes | |
| has_next_page | Yes | Whether more pages of results are available. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Goes well beyond the readOnly/non-destructive annotations: inline images are low-res previews not for the user, `image_url` is the high-res asset, URLs expire after 30 days so files must be downloaded rather than linked, and the tool renders an interactive gallery on MCP Apps hosts. These are real behavioral traits an agent could not infer from structured fields.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loaded with purpose, then image-handling rules in a logical order. Every sentence carries an actionable constraint, though the image preview/high-res/expiry points are restated enough to feel slightly dense.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With an output schema present and annotations covering the safety profile, the description fills exactly the gaps that matter: the preview-vs-hi-res distinction, expiry and download behavior, citation practice, and host-dependent gallery rendering. Nothing needed to call or consume the tool correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so all seven parameters are already documented in the schema (including task_intent and output_destination semantics). The description adds no additional parameter-level meaning, so the baseline 3 applies; its references to `image_url`/`mobbin_url` are outputs, not inputs.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Search Mobbin for website sections') and clarifies the target with concrete examples (About, Pricing, Footer). The resource noun 'sections' implicitly separates it from search_screens and search_flows, though it never names those siblings explicitly.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Strong guidance on how to consume results (read inline images, download from `image_url`, link to `mobbin_url`), but no explicit statement of when to choose this over search_screens or search_flows. Usage context is implied by the resource type rather than stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
- Changed
search_flows2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / output_destination / descriptionPrevious value: -"What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task."New value: +"What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, also when looking up examples to base it on first, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task." - changed
Input schema / properties / output_tool / descriptionPrevious value: -"The product the results go into next, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task."New value: +"The product the results go into next, not a later step, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task."
- Changed
search_screens2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / output_destination / descriptionPrevious value: -"What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task."New value: +"What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, also when looking up examples to base it on first, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task." - changed
Input schema / properties / output_tool / descriptionPrevious value: -"The product the results go into next, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task."New value: +"The product the results go into next, not a later step, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task."
- Changed
search_sections2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / output_destination / descriptionPrevious value: -"What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task."New value: +"What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, also when looking up examples to base it on first, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task." - changed
Input schema / properties / output_tool / descriptionPrevious value: -"The product the results go into next, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task."New value: +"The product the results go into next, not a later step, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task."
1 tool update
- Changed
search_screens5 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / ai_usage_notice / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - changed
Output schema / properties / ai_usage_notice / descriptionPrevious value: -"Present only when the user's AI usage is high. Show this markdown to the user word for word after presenting the results, keeping its formatting and line breaks."New value: +"Present only when the user's AI usage is high." - added
Output schema / properties / ai_usage_notice / propertiesAdded value: +{ + "credits_used": { + "description": "Credits used in the current period.", + "type": "number" + }, + "text": { + "description": "Show this markdown to the user word for word after presenting the results, keeping its formatting and line breaks.", + "type": "string" + } +} - added
Output schema / properties / ai_usage_notice / requiredAdded value: +[ + "text", + "credits_used" +] - changed
Output schema / properties / ai_usage_notice / typePrevious value: -"string"New value: +"object"
1 tool update
- Changed
search_screens1 field changed- added
Output schema / properties / ai_usage_noticeAdded value: +{ + "description": "Present only when the user's AI usage is high. Show this markdown to the user word for word after presenting the results, keeping its formatting and line breaks.", + "type": "string" +}
3 tool updates
- Changed
search_flows2 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / output_destinationAdded value: +{ + "description": "What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task.", + "enum": [ + "code", + "design_tool", + "doc", + "reference_library", + "chat", + "other" + ], + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / output_toolAdded value: +{ + "description": "The product the results go into next, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task.", + "type": "string" +}
- Changed
search_screens2 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / output_destinationAdded value: +{ + "description": "What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task.", + "enum": [ + "code", + "design_tool", + "doc", + "reference_library", + "chat", + "other" + ], + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / output_toolAdded value: +{ + "description": "The product the results go into next, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task.", + "type": "string" +}
- Changed
search_sections2 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / output_destinationAdded value: +{ + "description": "What you will do with the results after this call. Choose by what gets made with the results, not by the search itself. When the request does not say, go by where you are running: a coding agent in a repository means `code`, a design tool means `design_tool`, a plain chat host means `chat`. Helps return results in the form the workflow needs. `code`: implement or change UI in a codebase or coded prototype, e.g. React, Swift, HTML/CSS, v0, Lovable. `design_tool`: recreate or put results on a design canvas, e.g. Figma, Paper, Pen.dev, MagicPath. `doc`: write a report, PRD, spec, audit or slides, e.g. in Notion, Google Docs or Slides. `reference_library`: only when saving is the ask: the user wants the results kept for later in a folder, notes or a Mobbin collection. Looking things up to build, design or write from is NOT this. `chat`: only answer in the conversation; the user has not asked you to build, design, write or save anything. `other`: an unlisted destination, none of the above, e.g. posting the results to Slack or email. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task.", + "enum": [ + "code", + "design_tool", + "doc", + "reference_library", + "chat", + "other" + ], + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / output_toolAdded value: +{ + "description": "The product the results go into next, if known, e.g. Figma, Paper, Notion. Product name only. When the results go into more than one product, name the one the user asked for first. Not the search source: Mobbin only when the results go back to Mobbin. Omit when unknown. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task.", + "type": "string" +}
3 tool updates
- Changed
search_flows1 field changed- changed
Output schema / properties / flows / items / properties / screens / items / properties / image_url / descriptionPrevious value: -"Image URL for the screen. Expires after 30 days."New value: +"High-resolution image URL (up to 1920px wide). Download from it whenever the user wants to save, export, embed, or paste the image. Expires after 30 days."
- Changed
search_screens1 field changed- changed
Output schema / properties / screens / items / properties / image_url / descriptionPrevious value: -"Image URL for the screen. Expires after 30 days."New value: +"High-resolution image URL (up to 1920px wide). Download from it whenever the user wants to save, export, embed, or paste the image. Expires after 30 days."
- Changed
search_sections1 field changed- changed
Output schema / properties / sections / items / properties / image_url / descriptionPrevious value: -"Image URL for the section. Expires after 30 days."New value: +"High-resolution image URL (up to 1920px wide). Download from it whenever the user wants to save, export, embed, or paste the image. Expires after 30 days."
3 tool updates
- Changed
search_flows1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / task_intent / descriptionPrevious value: -"One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data."New value: +"One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. Write it in English even when the conversation is in another language. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data."
- Changed
search_screens1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / task_intent / descriptionPrevious value: -"One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data."New value: +"One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. Write it in English even when the conversation is in another language. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data."
- Changed
search_sections1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / task_intent / descriptionPrevious value: -"One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data."New value: +"One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. Write it in English even when the conversation is in another language. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data."
3 tool updates
- Changed
search_flows1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / task_intentAdded value: +{ + "description": "One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data.", + "type": "string" +}
- Changed
search_screens1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / task_intentAdded value: +{ + "description": "One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data.", + "type": "string" +}
- Changed
search_sections1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / task_intentAdded value: +{ + "description": "One short sentence summarizing the user's overall task. Helps return more relevant results. MUST be the same across all calls for the same task. Do NOT include verbatim user messages, conversation history, file contents, or personal data.", + "type": "string" +}
3 tool updates
- First observed
search_flows - First observed
search_screens - First observed
search_sections
Publisher details
- Operator
- Mobbin · Publisher source
- Operator website
- https://mobbin.com
- Vendor relationship
- First-party
- Documentation
- https://docs.mobbin.com
- Trust center
- https://trust.mobbin.com/
- Restrictions
- Unknown
Related MCP Connectors
- mcpOAuthcom.gummble
Search 300k+ real app screens, flows, and UX microcopy from 1,500+ shipped products.
Mobile UI/UX design research: real app screens, user flows and UI patterns with cited evidence.
Search curated design styles, real product screens, and user flows for evidence-based design work.
UI design that stands out. Full-screen UI references and design materials for coding agents.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceStructured design references from 1,000+ curated websites for AI-powered web design. Retrieve real CSS values, typography specs, color palettes, and design rationale via MCP.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables users to search and browse Mobbin's extensive library of mobile app designs, screenshots, and user flows directly from Claude. It allows for detailed exploration of UI patterns, elements, and personal collections using reverse-engineered API access.140 npm46ISC
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenance🎨 AI-powered UI/UX design intelligence - 1519+ curated design resources through MCP | React, Vue, Next.js, Flutter & more7310 npm36MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides curated real website design references with structured JSON data on type, spacing, palette, and layout. Enables AI agents to search, browse, and analyze over 1,000 sites and their sections.1MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.