CSV Import Rehearsal
Server Details
Simulate a CSV import against a supplied typed column contract and return exact accepted rows, re...
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolrehearse_csv_importARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Simulate a CSV import against a supplied typed column contract and return exact accepted rows, rejected rows, proposed normalizations and formula-risk cells. The rehearsal never writes an import destination. Price: 0.03 USDC per completed bounded job on Base.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| csv | Yes | ||
| columns | Yes | ||
| delimiter | No | ||
| allow_extra_columns | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already mark this as read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, and the description adds valuable context: it never writes an import destination, costs 0.03 USDC per completed bounded job, and returns specific result categories. This goes beyond the annotation hints without contradicting them.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences with no filler. The primary action is front-loaded, the result payload is summarized efficiently, and the cost/side-effect guarantee are useful additions placed at the end.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no output schema, the description usefully names the exact categories of returned results and states the non-persistent behavior. It still leaves some ambiguity around what 'bounded job' means and how malformed CSV is handled, but the core selection and invocation context is clear.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter meaning. It only broadly references 'csv' and a 'typed column contract' (columns), but does not explain delimiter, allow_extra_columns, or the precise format expectations for csv. The schema provides structure, but the description adds limited parameter-level value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states a specific verb and resource: simulate a CSV import against a typed column contract. It enumerates exact outputs—accepted rows, rejected rows, proposed normalizations, and formula-risk cells—and explicitly distinguishes this from a real import by noting it never writes to an import destination.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The usage context is implied by the name and wording: use this as a safe rehearsal before a real import, since it never writes. However, there are no explicit when-to-use/when-not-to-use instructions and no alternatives are mentioned, so the guidance is only implicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
rehearse_csv_import
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Replay supplied records against old and new bounded JSON Schema draft-07 contracts. Receive exact...
11Deterministic acceptance report for a supplied product catalog: validates price/currency/availabi...
1Check a product CSV, handles, variant matrices and metafield keys. 4 of 6 free.
Deterministic bank-statement parsing: messy CSV/OFX to clean categorized rows. In-memory only.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceValidates Excel (.xlsx) workbooks against reviewed, lockable acceptance contracts, catching errors and outputting structured issues that agents can repair.1MIT
- FlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceA stdio MCP server for safely reading, analyzing, validating, and transforming CSV/TSV files, with sandboxed file system access and configurable parsing options.14-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceValidates AI-generated artifacts (JSON, API responses, SQL) against a contract and returns a verdict.1591MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables an AI assistant to preview, query, aggregate, and convert CSV/TSV data safely with no API key.3MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or misselection. The tool's purpose is clearly described as simulating a CSV import against a typed contract.
The single tool name follows a clean verb_noun pattern (rehearse_csv_import) and is descriptive. With one tool, there is no mixed convention to flag.
The server has exactly one tool for a very narrow purpose. While the scope does not demand more, one tool feels thin and is only borderline appropriate for an MCP server.
The tool fully addresses the stated purpose of rehearsing CSV imports. It returns all necessary outputs—accepted rows, rejected rows, normalizations, and formula-risk cells—leaving no obvious dead ends.