Skip to main content
Glama

UK Petitions MCP Server from MCPBundles

Server Details

Search UK Parliament petitions, view signatures, government responses, and debate outcomes

Ownership verified
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
thinkchainai/mcpbundles
GitHub Stars
0

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides access to live UK Parliament data including bills, votes, MP profiles, and financial interests without requiring an API key. It enables users to track parliamentary rebellions, search petitions, and cross-reference voting records with declared financial interests.
    5
    12
    9
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Query current and historical UK official figures (tax bands, minimum wage, benefits, energy price cap and 100+ more) with effective dates and links to official government sources. Data refreshed whenever the official sources change.
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves detailed information for a specific petition by ID, while the other searches petitions by keyword and state. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the right tool.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent 'petitions-verb-afc' naming pattern, using snake_case with a clear verb-noun structure. This predictability aids in tool identification and usage.

Tool Count2/5

With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for handling UK Parliament petitions. Key operations like creating, updating, or deleting petitions are missing, limiting the server's utility for a complete workflow.

Completeness2/5

The server covers retrieval and search but lacks essential CRUD operations (e.g., create, update, delete) and other lifecycle actions (e.g., signing petitions, tracking changes). This creates significant gaps for agent-driven interactions with the petition system.