Maha Context Review

With only one tool there is no cross-tool confusion, and the name plus description clearly target context retention review. However, the tool bundles two distinct operations (budgeted passage selection and evidence-excerpt verification), so its own boundary is somewhat blurred.

review_context_retention is a clear snake_case verb_noun-style name that reads predictably. With a single tool there is no pattern to violate, but also no convention demonstrated across the set.

A single tool for a server whose description implies separate selection and verification workflows feels thin and borderline. The tool is non-trivial, but the scope likely warrants splitting into at least two operations.

The surface covers only passage selection under a token budget plus evidence-excerpt checking; there is no tool for token counting, document/source listing, summarization, or inspecting selection results. Agents will hit dead ends for the surrounding review workflow.