Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

L402 MCP: 5 paid BTC/Lightning tools + fiat credits, 10-25 sats/call.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
Loop-XXI/loop-mcp
GitHub Stars
0

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Discover and pay for APIs and MCP tools per call over Bitcoin Lightning (L402): search the bolthub marketplace, preview prices, and pay from your own wallet (LND, NWC, LNbits) with hard budgets, prepaid credit, scoped sub-agent delegation, and verifiable receipts. Non-custodial and works without a wallet for search and free tools.
    2
    19
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    L402 + x402 client MCP. AI agents discover, pay for, and consume any payment-gated API autonomously. Supports Lightning (NWC), Cashu ecash, stablecoins, and human-in-the-loop payments.
    11
    586
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that gives autonomous agents pay-per-call Bitcoin context (self-custody radar, fee percentiles, price change windows, condition frequencies) paid in sats over Lightning via L402 invoices, with no account or API key required.
    7
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server offering 26 Lightning-paid tools for Bitcoin mempool intelligence and sovereign on-prem AI inference, with no third-party APIs and pay-per-call in sats.
    26
    23
    1
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes. However, btc_send_decision and optimal_send_window both deal with Bitcoin transaction timing, which could cause slight confusion. Other tools are well-separated.

Naming Consistency3/5

The naming convention is mostly snake_case with a noun_verb pattern (e.g., base64_convert, hash_generate), but there are deviations like btc_price (noun_noun), optimal_send_window (adjective_noun_noun), and btc_send_decision (noun_verb_noun). Inconsistency in verb presence and word order.

Tool Count5/5

15 tools is a well-scoped number for a server covering both general utilities and Bitcoin-specific functions. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and the count is neither too sparse nor overwhelming.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers both utility and Bitcoin domains reasonably well. Missing some common utility operations (e.g., encryption/decryption, other data formats) and Bitcoin operations (e.g., fee estimation, transaction creation), but core workflows are supported.