Loomaly

Most tools target a clearly distinct action (add_site vs rescan_site, mark_fixed vs ignore_finding, set_brief vs set_focus_page). However, the findings-resolution cluster (findings_list, fix_first, fix_prompt, mark_fixed, verify, verify_status) has overlapping boundaries — an agent could confuse manually claiming a fix vs re-crawling to verify, or the raw findings list vs the prioritized queue. Detailed descriptions mitigate this but the overlap is real.

All names use snake_case consistently, which is a strong baseline. There is minor inconsistency in ordering: most are verb_noun (add_site, rescan_site, mark_fixed) but list tools are noun-first (findings_list, sites_list), and several are bare noun phrases (focus_page, link_suggestions, search_performance). Still readable and predictable overall.

17 tools is on the heavier side but each maps to a genuine capability (site management, scanning, findings, fix workflow, search data, settings, verification). Nothing is obviously redundant, so the count is justified by the domain's breadth, though it sits near the upper comfortable bound.

Covers the full audit lifecycle: onboarding sites, scanning, listing/prioritizing findings, fixing, verifying, plus link suggestions, change logging, brief/focus settings, and search performance. A notable gap is site removal/deletion, and reopening ignored findings is pushed to the dashboard, but core workflows have no dead ends.