MindMap
Server Details
Turn outlines and hierarchical notes into interactive mind maps through a hosted remote MCP server.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 4.5/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined.
The single tool name 'render_mindmap' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, consistent with best practices.
A single tool is borderline for a server; while the narrow purpose (rendering mind maps) justifies it, it feels thin compared to typical servers. The calibration suggests 1-2 tools is 'thin'.
The tool fully covers its stated purpose (rendering a mind map from markdown input). No other operations are needed for this specific function, so there are no obvious gaps.
Available Tools
1 toolrender_mindmapMind MapARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Render an interactive MCP app mind map when the user needs hierarchical structure shown visually instead of as prose. Use it for breaking down ideas, plans, study material, or systems into a root topic with nested branches; do not use it for tables, flowcharts, Mermaid/Graphviz diagrams, or plain text lists. Input mindmap_markdown must be a clean markdown tree with one # root heading and 2-space-indented bullet nesting. If the user gives prose, first reshape it into that hierarchy, then call this tool.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | No | Optional short title for the mind map | |
| mindmap_markdown | Yes | Markdown tree for a mind map. Preferred structure: one top-level heading for the root topic, then nested bullet points for branches and leaves using consistent 2-space indentation. Example: `# Product Launch Strategy - Marketing - Social Media - Twitter - LinkedIn - Email Campaign - Newsletter - Promo Codes - Engineering - QA Testing - Server Scaling - Final Deployment - Customer Support - Help Docs Updated - Support Training`. When the topic is suitable for emojis (e.g., marketing, events, social media, holidays, categories like food/travel), use relevant emojis in node names to make the diagram more appealing — like 📱 for Social Media or 🚀 for Launch. Avoid prose paragraphs, tables, fenced code blocks, and mixed list styles. |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive. Description adds behavioral context: renders interactive mind map, specific input format, and emoji usage. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Description is efficiently structured but contains a long example; could be slightly more concise while retaining value. Front-loaded with purpose and usage, then format details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Input side is thoroughly covered, but output is not described (e.g., what the interactive mind map looks like or how it is returned). Given no output schema, this is a gap for completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%. Description adds substantial meaning beyond schema: detailed structure rules, example, emoji guidance for mindmap_markdown parameter. Title is clearly described as optional short title.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool renders an interactive mind map for hierarchical structures, using specific verb 'Render' and resource 'MCP app mind map'. It distinguishes from siblings and other visualizations like tables, flowcharts, and lists.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly states when to use (breaking down ideas, plans, etc.) and when not to use (tables, flowcharts, Mermaid diagrams, plain lists). Provides alternative approach: reshape prose into hierarchy before calling.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!