domain-age-pro
Server Details
Domain Age PRO: Check the domain age using fastest api response. On the JoJ API marketplace.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 99.9% over 37 days
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-06-18
- URL
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion with other tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly described as retrieving domain age.
The tool name 'get_getAge' is redundant (double 'get') and mixes verb-with-noun awkwardly. It lacks any consistent pattern and is confusing despite a clear description.
Having only one tool for a domain-age service is too few to be robust. Users might expect additional operations like domain validation or WHOIS details, but the surface is minimal.
The tool fulfills its stated purpose of fetching domain age completely. While additional domain-related operations could be imagined, for a focused age-lookup service, the coverage is adequate.
Available Tools
1 toolget_getAge/getAge/CInspect
Get domain age Billing per call: 1 Credits.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description lacks explicit behavioral disclosures beyond the basic 'get' operation. While it mentions a cost per call (1 Credit), it does not elaborate on side effects, permissions, rate limits, or error handling, which are critical for a tool without annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise, consisting of only one sentence, but it awkwardly merges the core functionality with billing information, which could be better separated. The structure lacks clear segmentation, making it less readable than it could be.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description fails to provide essential context such as the expected return value, potential limitations, or how the tool fits into a larger workflow. With no output schema and minimal details, it is insufficient for a user to understand the tool's full behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema lists a single parameter 'domain' without any description, and the tool description does not clarify its meaning, format, or constraints. The example 'google.com' is present in the schema but not explained, so parameter semantics are virtually undefined.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the primary function as 'Get domain age', which is a specific verb and resource. However, the inclusion of 'Billing per call: 1 Credits' is somewhat tangential and could be confused with the core purpose, slightly reducing clarity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention any prerequisites or conditions for its usage. It simply states the action without contextualizing its appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
- First observed
get_getAge
Related MCP Connectors
SERP data scraper: Scrape Search Results and get all the data you need. On the JoJ API marketplace.
Search the JoJ API marketplace, read endpoint docs, and call any API with one key via one gateway.
Domain DA-PA Checker: Domain authority score & page authority score, spam score, backlink count.
Domain search, registration, DNS, marketplace, and checkout with your AI agent.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAuthoritative Verisign registry socket lookup, domain age calculation, and lifecycle analysis for AI agents2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables domain intelligence lookups including current and historical WHOIS, reverse WHOIS by registrant info, and DNS record retrieval through the WhoisXML API.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to check whether a domain name is available for registration via the RapidAPI Domain Status API.114 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query domain expiration data from domain-monitor.io, with tools for listing domains, checking expiry, and adding new domains.1-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.