Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

iDos Games

by com.idosgames
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Save Reward settings

save_reward
Destructive

PARTIAL SAVE: writes ONLY the 'Reward' field of TitlePublicConfigurationModel; all other v1/v2 fields stay untouched. Reward templates — reusable bundles of currency + items + buffs that can be granted to a player. Referenced by Quest, TimedEvent, CoopEvent, Season, DailyLogin, Referral, etc. Define a reward once here, then reference it everywhere instead of inlining payouts.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
valueYesRoot config for universal, system-agnostic rewards. Umbrella over four independent subsystems: DailyCalendars, IdleAccruals, Comebacks, Claims.
title_idYesTitleID, для которого сохраняются данные.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / definitions / ResourceEntryType / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "Item",
-  "VirtualCurrency",
-  "CryptoCurrency",
-  "Purchase",
-  "RewardedVideoCredit",
-  "PlatformCoin"
-]New value: +[
+  "Item",
+  "VirtualCurrency",
+  "CryptoCurrency",
+  "Purchase",
+  "RewardedVideoCredit",
+  "PlatformCredits"
+]
    • changedInput schema / definitions / ResourceEntryType / x-enum-descriptions
      Previous value: -[
-  "Catalog item. Requires CatalogID, ItemID and Amount.",
-  "In-game (off-chain) virtual currency. Requires CurrencyID and Amount. Looked up in cfg.Currency.VirtualCurrencies.",
-  "On-chain cryptocurrency. Requires CurrencyID and Amount. Looked up in cfg.Currency.CryptoCurrencies.",
-  "Real-money payment in a store. Requires only ProductID (a product from cfg.Purchase.Products); the amount and currency are decided by the store from the SKU price tier. NOT a storable resource and never passes through ResourceService — the money is paid outside before the server learns about it, so the entry is consumed by the receipt check (ExternalPaymentGate) and stripped before the resource operation. Allowed only in Consume and only for Consumable products.",
-  "Rewarded-video credit. One credit equals one verified ad view that can be spent in systems requiring rewarded video (lootbox open, reward double, re-roll, booster). Granted +1 per server-verified view, or as N from milestones/quests/premium perks; spent -1 per gated action.",
-  "Payment in Coin, the PLATFORM currency on the player's iDos Games account. Requires only Amount — the price in whole Coin. Like Purchase it is NOT a player resource and never enters ResourceService: it is settled by PlatformCoinPayment in the same transaction as the grant (buyer charged, author credited). Accepted only by the store (Store.Purchase) for now; allowed only in Consume."
-]New value: +[
+  "Catalog item. Requires CatalogID, ItemID and Amount.",
+  "In-game (off-chain) virtual currency. Requires CurrencyID and Amount. Looked up in cfg.Currency.VirtualCurrencies.",
+  "On-chain cryptocurrency. Requires CurrencyID and Amount. Looked up in cfg.Currency.CryptoCurrencies.",
+  "Real-money payment in a store. Requires only ProductID (a product from cfg.Purchase.Products); the amount and currency are decided by the store from the SKU price tier. NOT a storable resource and never passes through ResourceService — the money is paid outside before the server learns about it, so the entry is consumed by the receipt check (ExternalPaymentGate) and stripped before the resource operation. Allowed only in Consume and only for Consumable products.",
+  "Rewarded-video credit. One credit equals one verified ad view that can be spent in systems requiring rewarded video (lootbox open, reward double, re-roll, booster). Granted +1 per server-verified view, or as N from milestones/quests/premium perks; spent -1 per gated action.",
+  "Payment in Credits, the PLATFORM currency on the player's iDos Games account (players see it as \"Aspis\" — write Aspis in player-facing text). Requires only Amount — the price in whole Credits. Like Purchase it is NOT a player resource and never enters ResourceService: it is settled by PlatformCreditsPayment in the same transaction as the grant (buyer charged, author credited). Accepted only by the store (Store.Purchase) for now; allowed only in Consume."
+]
    • changedInput schema / definitions / ResourceEntryType / x-enumNames
      Previous value: -[
-  "Item",
-  "VirtualCurrency",
-  "CryptoCurrency",
-  "Purchase",
-  "RewardedVideoCredit",
-  "PlatformCoin"
-]New value: +[
+  "Item",
+  "VirtualCurrency",
+  "CryptoCurrency",
+  "Purchase",
+  "RewardedVideoCredit",
+  "PlatformCredits"
+]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / definitions / ResourceEntryType / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "Item",
-  "VirtualCurrency",
-  "CryptoCurrency",
-  "Purchase",
-  "RewardedVideoCredit"
-]New value: +[
+  "Item",
+  "VirtualCurrency",
+  "CryptoCurrency",
+  "Purchase",
+  "RewardedVideoCredit",
+  "PlatformCoin"
+]
    • changedInput schema / definitions / ResourceEntryType / x-enum-descriptions
      Previous value: -[
-  "Catalog item. Requires CatalogID, ItemID and Amount.",
-  "In-game (off-chain) virtual currency. Requires CurrencyID and Amount. Looked up in cfg.Currency.VirtualCurrencies.",
-  "On-chain cryptocurrency. Requires CurrencyID and Amount. Looked up in cfg.Currency.CryptoCurrencies.",
-  "Real-money payment in a store. Requires only ProductID (a product from cfg.Purchase.Products); the amount and currency are decided by the store from the SKU price tier. NOT a storable resource and never passes through ResourceService — the money is paid outside before the server learns about it, so the entry is consumed by the receipt check (ExternalPaymentGate) and stripped before the resource operation. Allowed only in Consume and only for Consumable products.",
-  "Rewarded-video credit. One credit equals one verified ad view that can be spent in systems requiring rewarded video (lootbox open, reward double, re-roll, booster). Granted +1 per server-verified view, or as N from milestones/quests/premium perks; spent -1 per gated action."
-]New value: +[
+  "Catalog item. Requires CatalogID, ItemID and Amount.",
+  "In-game (off-chain) virtual currency. Requires CurrencyID and Amount. Looked up in cfg.Currency.VirtualCurrencies.",
+  "On-chain cryptocurrency. Requires CurrencyID and Amount. Looked up in cfg.Currency.CryptoCurrencies.",
+  "Real-money payment in a store. Requires only ProductID (a product from cfg.Purchase.Products); the amount and currency are decided by the store from the SKU price tier. NOT a storable resource and never passes through ResourceService — the money is paid outside before the server learns about it, so the entry is consumed by the receipt check (ExternalPaymentGate) and stripped before the resource operation. Allowed only in Consume and only for Consumable products.",
+  "Rewarded-video credit. One credit equals one verified ad view that can be spent in systems requiring rewarded video (lootbox open, reward double, re-roll, booster). Granted +1 per server-verified view, or as N from milestones/quests/premium perks; spent -1 per gated action.",
+  "Payment in Coin, the PLATFORM currency on the player's iDos Games account. Requires only Amount — the price in whole Coin. Like Purchase it is NOT a player resource and never enters ResourceService: it is settled by PlatformCoinPayment in the same transaction as the grant (buyer charged, author credited). Accepted only by the store (Store.Purchase) for now; allowed only in Consume."
+]
    • changedInput schema / definitions / ResourceEntryType / x-enumNames
      Previous value: -[
-  "Item",
-  "VirtualCurrency",
-  "CryptoCurrency",
-  "Purchase",
-  "RewardedVideoCredit"
-]New value: +[
+  "Item",
+  "VirtualCurrency",
+  "CryptoCurrency",
+  "Purchase",
+  "RewardedVideoCredit",
+  "PlatformCoin"
+]
  3. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is known. The description earns credit for the non-obvious 'PARTIAL SAVE' scope — only the Reward field is touched, all other v1/v2 fields survive — but it never says whether the whole Reward object is replaced (i.e. omitted subsections like Claims or DailyCalendars get wiped), which is exactly the risk a destructive write carries.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences, correctly front-loaded with the PARTIAL SAVE constraint that a caller most needs to see. The final clause restates the 'define once, reference everywhere' idea already implied by the template sentence, and the currency/items/buffs framing is imprecise against the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a very large nested payload, a destructive write annotation and no output schema, the description covers the operation's scope but omits the highest-value facts: whether the save replaces the entire Reward block (data-loss risk), and any prerequisite such as reading existing state first. Adequate for a config-save tool, but not complete enough for a destructive overwrite of a complex document.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the deep nested payload is already self-documenting and a baseline 3 applies. The description adds only a loose characterization, 'bundles of currency + items + buffs', which does not match the schema's actual scope (Claims, Presets, Comebacks, TierRewards, IdleAccruals, DailyCalendars, MilestoneRewardMultiplier) and adds nothing about title_id or how the value object is structured.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb plus the exact target field ('writes ONLY the Reward field of TitlePublicConfigurationModel'), then explains what that field holds (reward templates referenced by Quest, TimedEvent, CoopEvent, etc.). An agent can immediately tell this apart from siblings like save_quest or save_currency without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives real design guidance — 'Define a reward once here, then reference it everywhere instead of inlining payouts' — which tells the agent when this tool is the right one rather than embedding payouts in a quest or event config. It stops short of explicit exclusions (e.g. use get_reward first to avoid clobbering existing sections), so it is clear context rather than a full when/when-not matrix.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All iDos Games toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources