Catalogue Homeoceutics / Homeoceutics Catalog
Server Details
Catalogue public anonyme en lecture seule. Anonymous, read-only public catalog.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 99.9% over 24 days
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
- URL
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are clearly distinct by content type: one searches information-card titles, the other searches infoceutic titles. No overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tool names follow the same 'search_' + plural noun pattern, making the naming scheme predictable and consistent.
With only 2 tools, the set feels thin, even though each tool covers one of the two catalog categories. It is borderline but not excessively under-scoped.
The catalog domain would naturally benefit from retrieval of full details for individual items, not just title search. The tools cover only title-level browsing, leaving notable gaps for agents needing complete catalog information.
Available Tools
2 toolssearch_fiches_informationCatalogue des fiches d'information / Information cards catalogBRead-onlyIdempotentInspect
FR : Rechercher ou parcourir les titres des fiches d’information du catalogue public. EN: Search or browse information-card titles in the public catalog.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | FR : Taille de page. EN: Page size. | |
| query | No | FR : Texte recherché dans l’index complet ; omettre pour parcourir par titre. EN: Text searched in the full index; omit to browse by title. | |
| locale | No | FR : Langue demandée ; les titres indisponibles sont repliés vers le français. EN: Requested language; unavailable titles fall back to French. | fr |
| offset | No | FR : Décalage de page, à reprendre depuis pagination.next_offset. EN: Page offset, continued from pagination.next_offset. | |
| statut | No | FR : Statut de visibilité anonyme à filtrer. EN: Anonymous visibility status to filter by. | |
| categorie | No | FR : Identifiant exact d’une catégorie, réutilisable depuis categories[].id. EN: Exact category identifier, reusable from categories[].id. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| items | Yes | FR : Titres et métadonnées uniquement. EN: Titles and metadata only. |
| locale | Yes | FR : Langue demandée pour cette page. EN: Locale requested for this page. |
| pagination | Yes | FR : Pagination déterministe par offset. EN: Deterministic offset pagination. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only the public-catalog and title-level scope, and does not disclose additional behaviors such as result ordering, pagination behavior, or locale fallback beyond what the schema already documents.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise and front-loaded, using two short bilingual sentences with no filler. The FR/EN duplication is justified by the bilingual context, though it leaves behavioral and selection detail to the schema and annotations.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read-only catalog search tool, the schema and annotations carry most of the burden and are quite complete. However, the description does not differentiate this tool from its only sibling, search_infoceutiques, and does not clarify whether results contain only titles or fuller card content, leaving a meaningful selection gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents every parameter, including enums, defaults, and cross-references like pagination.next_offset and categories[].id. The tool description itself contributes no parameter-level meaning, so the baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'Rechercher ou parcourir' the 'titres des fiches d’information du catalogue public'. It clearly identifies what the tool acts on and that it covers public information-card titles, though it does not explicitly contrast with the sibling tool search_infoceutiques.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies a search-versus-browse distinction, reinforced by the query parameter's note to 'omit to browse by title'. However, it does not state when to prefer this tool over search_infoceutiques or provide exclusion criteria, so usage guidance is mostly implicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_infoceutiquesCatalogue des infoceutiques / Infoceutics catalogARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
FR : Rechercher ou parcourir les titres des infoceutiques du catalogue public. EN: Search or browse infoceutic titles in the public catalog.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | FR : Taille de page. EN: Page size. | |
| query | No | FR : Texte recherché dans l’index complet ; omettre pour parcourir par titre. EN: Text searched in the full index; omit to browse by title. | |
| locale | No | FR : Langue demandée ; les titres indisponibles sont repliés vers le français. EN: Requested language; unavailable titles fall back to French. | fr |
| offset | No | FR : Décalage de page, à reprendre depuis pagination.next_offset. EN: Page offset, continued from pagination.next_offset. | |
| statut | No | FR : Statut de visibilité anonyme à filtrer. EN: Anonymous visibility status to filter by. | |
| categorie | No | FR : Identifiant exact d’une catégorie, réutilisable depuis categories[].id. EN: Exact category identifier, reusable from categories[].id. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| items | Yes | FR : Titres et métadonnées uniquement. EN: Titles and metadata only. |
| locale | Yes | FR : Langue demandée pour cette page. EN: Locale requested for this page. |
| pagination | Yes | FR : Pagination déterministe par offset. EN: Deterministic offset pagination. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond that, mainly the 'public catalog' scope, but does not describe any extra behavior such as result handling or fallbacks.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is compact, bilingual, and front-loaded with the action and resource. Every sentence earns its place, and the FR/EN duplication is intentional for the target audience.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the rich schema, the output schema, and the annotations, the description is nearly complete for safe invocation. It could more explicitly steer between this tool and search_fiches_information, but the public-catalog and titles context is enough for an agent to proceed correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all six parameters, including pagination offsets, locale fallback, and category filtering. The description itself adds no parameter-level detail, which is acceptable per the baseline for full schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb pair ('search or browse') and a specific resource ('infoceutic titles in the public catalog'), making the tool's purpose clear. It does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling search_fiches_information, but the public-catalog/titles scope is distinct enough to avoid major ambiguity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description clearly states the tool is for searching or browsing infoceutic titles in the public catalog, giving the agent a concrete usage context. It does not mention when not to use it or point to alternatives, but the public-catalog and title scope is sufficient guidance for basic selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
- First observed
search_fiches_information - First observed
search_infoceutiques
Related MCP Connectors
Anonymous read-only access to source-backed public SHAR Production knowledge.
Read-only Bicycle Guide registry: published guides, homes, taxonomy, capability spine. No auth.
Read-only Bicycle Guide registry: published guides, homes, taxonomy, capability spine. No auth.
Read-only Bicycle Guide registry: published guides, homes, taxonomy, capability spine. No auth.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only search and retrieval of the public Reknihy.cz book catalog, including filtering, sorting, ISBN lookup, category browsing, and access to product details such as price, availability, and images.4ISC

geolens-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRead-only access to a self-hosted GeoLens geospatial catalog: dataset search, schemas, GeoJSON features, saved maps, and sandboxed read-only SQL over PostGIS.6257Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides read-only access to the Lumenco product catalog, enabling retrieval of products, specifications, listings, and recommendation candidates without browsing the site.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only access to Pocket Agent's product information, public persona templates, and app catalog. No authentication required.25 npm1MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.