Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Hextrap's MCP Connector protects your LLM coding sessions from installing malicious dependencies, typosquats, unpopular packages, and enforces your strict allow and deny lists.

No setup means your LLM uses MCP to configure itself to use Hextrap's proxy's automatically, enforcing your firewall rules immediately. Manage your allow and deny lists right from your favorite LLM.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables secure interaction between LLMs and MCP tools by applying zero-trust security controls, including sensitive data masking, file system protection, and policy enforcement.
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A security MCP proxy that monitors and blocks data exfiltration between AI agents and their tools by detecting toxic flows (untrusted → sensitive → egress) deterministically with zero LLM calls in the decision path.
    1
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity: allowlist/denylist management, package checking, credential handling, activity monitoring, firewall listing, and proxy configuration. The descriptions clearly differentiate their functions, such as 'check_package' for security verification versus 'add_to_allowlist' for policy management.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case, such as 'add_to_allowlist', 'remove_from_denylist', and 'get_proxy_config'. The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set, with no deviations in style or convention.

Tool Count5/5

With 10 tools, the count is well-scoped for managing a firewall system, covering key operations like listing, checking, configuring, and maintaining security policies. Each tool earns its place without redundancy, fitting a typical range for this domain.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides complete coverage for firewall management: CRUD operations for allowlist/denylist, package verification, credential lifecycle (create, get, roll), activity monitoring, and firewall listing. There are no obvious gaps, enabling agents to handle full workflows from setup to maintenance.

Resources