Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Kotlin compile-time SQL library. Docs, code validation, and SQLite execution tools.

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.1/5 across 6 of 6 tools scored. Lowest: 3.2/5.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation2/5

There is significant overlap between tools, particularly getExoQueryDocs and getExoQueryDocsMulti which both retrieve documentation with only a single vs. multiple files distinction, and validateAndRunExoquery and validateExoquery which appear to be identical duplicates. This creates confusion about which tool to use for documentation retrieval and query validation, as their purposes are not clearly distinct.

Naming Consistency3/5

The naming is mixed with no clear pattern: getExoQueryDocs and getExoQueryDocsMulti use camelCase, listExoQueryDocs uses camelCase but starts with 'list', runRawSql uses camelCase, and validateAndRunExoquery and validateExoquery use camelCase but are nearly identical. While all are camelCase, the verb choices (get, list, run, validate) are inconsistent in style and some names are overly long or redundant.

Tool Count4/5

With 6 tools, the count is reasonable for a server focused on ExoQuery documentation and SQL validation. However, the presence of duplicate or highly overlapping tools (e.g., two documentation retrieval tools and two validation tools) suggests the count could be optimized by merging or removing redundancies, slightly reducing appropriateness.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers key areas for ExoQuery: documentation access (single and multi-file), listing documentation, raw SQL execution, and ExoQuery code validation/execution. However, there are minor gaps such as no tool for schema management or direct database connection handling, and the duplication in validation tools creates redundancy rather than extending coverage.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources