title-check
Server Details
VIN/HIN pre-purchase report: open NHTSA recalls, complaints, investigations, title-brand & liens.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolvehicle_reportAInspect
Generate a pre-purchase report for a titled asset by VIN (cars, trucks, RVs, trailers, heavy equipment) or HIN (recreational boats). Returns open federal NHTSA recalls (severity-ranked), consumer-complaint crash/fire/injury/death counts, open investigations, VIN check-digit + factory decode, and the exact next-step sources for lien & title-brand. Public NHTSA/USCG data — not an official title record; lien/salvage need a state/NMVTIS check, which the report links.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| hin | No | 12-character Hull Identification Number (recreational boats). | |
| vin | No | 17-character VIN (cars/trucks/RVs/trailers/equipment). |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations present, so description carries full burden. It discloses data sources (public NHTSA/USCG), limitations (not official title), and return items (recalls, complaints, investigations, decode, next-step sources). No hidden behaviors remain.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single paragraph but well-structured: main action first, then scope, then detailed contents, then caveats. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite no output schema, the description enumerates all return elements (recalls with severity ranking, complaint counts, investigations, VIN check-digit, decode, next-step sources), making the tool's output fully predictable.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for 'vin' and 'hin' parameters. The description adds context on when to use each (VIN for land vehicles, HIN for boats) and the character lengths, enhancing understanding beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description specifies the tool generates a pre-purchase report for titled assets by VIN or HIN, lists vehicle types (cars, trucks, RVs, trailers, heavy equipment, recreational boats), and details the return data. The verb 'generate' and resource 'pre-purchase report' are clear.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly states when to use the tool (pre-purchase check), what data it covers (public NHTSA/USCG), and importantly distinguishes it from official title records, advising a state/NMVTIS check for lien/salvage. It provides clear alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Decode VINs, search recalls, complaints, crash ratings, and investigations.
Decode any VIN and check open NHTSA safety recalls. Free official US government data, no auth.
Decodes US VINs and looks up open NHTSA safety recall campaigns for a vehicle.
Vehicle safety recalls, complaints, and crash data from NHTSA
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides comprehensive vehicle reports by aggregating data from multiple public sources to decode VINs, check recalls, and view safety ratings. It enables users to validate VINs locally and retrieve technical specifications, fuel economy, and vehicle photos without requiring API keys.18MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying U.S. vehicle safety and specification data, including VIN decoding, recalls, complaints, investigations, and crash test ratings.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables instant U.S. vehicle recall lookup by make, model, and year using official NHTSA data.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceDecode VINs, look up specs, history, recalls, market value, and OBD codes. Recognize license plates and VINs from images. Access comprehensive vehicle data by year, make, and model to power automotive workflows.12MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of ambiguity or confusion between tools.
With a single tool, naming consistency is not applicable; no inconsistency can arise.
A single tool is slightly minimal but reasonable for a focused service like title checking, as the tool consolidates multiple data sources into one comprehensive report.
The tool covers VIN/HIN decoding, recalls, complaints, and provides sources for further title checks, but explicitly omits official title records, leaving minor gaps for users needing state/NMVTIS data.