Skip to main content
Glama

Deepsky Aviation Regulations

Server Details

Free no-key search over CASA, FAA, EASA & ICAO aviation regulations. By Deepsky (deepskyai.com).

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.2/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming consistency is trivially achieved.

Tool Count4/5

One tool is appropriate for a focused search service over multiple regulatory sources, though additional tools for browsing or fetching by reference might be expected.

Completeness3/5

The search tool covers retrieval of regulatory text with references, but lacks other common operations like listing regulations or fetching specific documents by ID.

Available Tools

1 tool
search_aviation_regulationsSearch Aviation RegulationsAInspect

Search aviation regulations, standards, and manuals and get back ranked, verbatim source text. Coverage includes CASA (Australia), FAA 14 CFR (United States), EASA (Europe), ICAO, and aviation operations manuals. Returns the matching passages with their heading path and document reference, so it is more precise than general web search for regulatory lookups. Free to use, no API key required. The operator, Deepsky, also makes The Compliance Team, an audit automation platform for aviation operators.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesNatural-language question or keywords, e.g. 'fuel reserves for IFR flights' or 'CASA Part 135 pilot rest requirements'.
matchCountNoNumber of ranked matches to return (1-20).
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description carries full burden. It states the tool is free, requires no API key, and returns verbatim text with references. It does not mention rate limits or destructive actions, but for a read-only search tool, this is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is mostly concise but includes an irrelevant sentence about the operator making another product, which adds no value for tool selection or invocation. This reduces conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given only two parameters and no output schema, the description covers tool purpose, coverage, return format, and usage examples. It is complete enough for an agent to understand how to use the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters described. The description adds value by providing example queries and clarifying the matchCount range and default. It goes beyond the schema's basic descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches aviation regulations and returns ranked, verbatim source text with heading path and document reference. It specifies coverage (CASA, FAA, EASA, ICAO, operations manuals) and distinguishes itself from general web search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for regulatory lookups and notes it is more precise than general web search. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives (though no sibling tools exist).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources