Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Permission boundary receipts for ChatGPT agents.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
clauxel/agent-data-boundary-mcp
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
AgentData Boundary MCP

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 4 tool updates
    • First observedexport_remediation_plan
    • First observedflag_sensitive_fields
    • First observedmap_permissions
    • First observedsummarize_boundary

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Post-quantum, tamper-evident receipts for consequential agent actions. Provides tools for auditing, gating decisions, and egress classification with quantum-hardened security.
    7
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Local zero-trust permission gateway for AI agents. Enforces policy-based tool authorization, human approvals, scoped permissions, and cryptographically verifiable audit logs.
    4
    5
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Provides permission gates and tamper-evident audit logging for AI agent tool executions, with declarative policies, consent ladders, and hash-chained verification.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

C2.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct aspect of data boundary management: exporting plans, flagging fields, mapping permissions, and summarizing boundaries. No overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lowercase snake_case (export_remediation_plan, flag_sensitive_fields, map_permissions, summarize_boundary), making them predictable and easy to distinguish.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is well-scoped for a focused domain like data boundary management. Each tool serves a clear purpose without excess or deficiency.

Completeness4/5

The set covers key operations: exporting plans, flagging sensitive fields, mapping permissions, and summarizing boundaries. Minor gaps like updating or deleting might exist, but for a specialized server the coverage is strong.