BlackVeil DNS & Email Security Scanner

check_authoritative_dns_infra

Read-onlyIdempotent

Measure authoritative DNS infrastructure posture for a hostname over direct DNS-over-TCP/53 from a single vantage: TCP/53 reachability, the authoritative AA flag, recursion exposure, SOA serial consistency across nameservers, DNSKEY/RRSIG presence (not validation), IPv4/IPv6 answer parity, and unsupported-query handling — plus, for authenticated callers, a zone-transfer refusal test (first response only, no zone data retrieved) and CHAOS version.bind/id.server disclosure. Reports UDP/53 reachability, amplification, EDNS large-response/truncation, DNS cookies/RRL, BGP origin, RPKI, route-leak signals, anycast diversity, vantage latency, and RIR/RDAP as inconclusive — none of those are measured. Uses BV_INFRA_PROBE when available.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`domain`	Yes	Domain to check (e.g., example.com)
`format`	No	Output verbosity. Auto-detected if omitted.
`force_refresh`	No	Bypass cache and run a fresh check. Useful after DNS changes.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`score`	Yes
`passed`	Yes
`partial`	No
`category`	Yes
`findings`	Yes
`checkStatus`	No
`verdictWithheld`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedOct 25, 2026
- addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
Changed1 schema field changedOct 5, 2026
- addedOutput schema / properties / verdictWithheld
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```
Changed2 schema fields changedAug 18, 2026
- addedOutput schema / properties / checkStatus
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "string"
+}
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / partial
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```

Changed1 schema field changedJul 2, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / force_refresh

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Bypass cache and run a fresh check. Useful after DNS changes.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}

Changed1 schema field changedMay 26, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": {},
+  "properties": {
+    "category": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "findings": {
+      "items": {
+        "additionalProperties": {},
+        "properties": {},
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "passed": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "score": {
+      "type": "number"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "category",
+    "score",
+    "passed",
+    "findings"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

AddedMay 21, 2026
RemovedMay 20, 2026
AddedMay 20, 2026

TDQS

A4/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, the description discloses important behavioral details: direct DNS-over-TCP/53 from a single vantage, that DNSKEY/RRSIG checks are presence-only and not validation, that zone-transfer testing is authenticated-only and retrieves no zone data, and that many adjacent infrastructure signals are not measured. It also notes the BV_INFRA_PROBE dependency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and remains information-dense, but it is a long run-on sentence with many semicolon-separated checks and non-checks. The negative list is useful for avoiding misinterpretation, though the density makes it less scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity, the annotations, the fully described schema, and the existing output schema, the description provides enough context about what is measured, what is not measured, authentication-dependent behavior, and the probe dependency. Return values and parameter details are appropriately left to the structured fields.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the domain, format, and force_refresh parameters are already documented in the input schema. The description does not add parameter-specific meaning beyond referring to a hostname and authenticated callers, so the baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: measure authoritative DNS infrastructure posture for a hostname over direct DNS-over-TCP/53 from a single vantage. It clearly enumerates the measured checks and distinguishes DNSKEY/RRSIG presence from validation, but it does not explicitly name sibling tools or route the agent between them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the detailed scope: authoritative DNS posture over TCP/53, with an explicit list of adjacent metrics that are not measured and therefore inconclusive. However, there is no direct when-to-use statement or named alternative such as check_dnssec, check_ns, or check_zone_hygiene.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All BlackVeil DNS & Email Security Scanner tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.