Skip to main content
Glama

BlackVeil DNS & Email Security Scanner

brand_audit_get_report

Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch the result JSON for a completed brand audit. With target set, returns the per-target CheckResult; without, returns the audit-level aggregate. Returns notReady when polling an in-flight audit. When a rendered PDF sidecar exists, metadata includes pdfUrl — an authenticated /reports/ download link (same bearer credential as this call). Completed targets whose PDF is still rendering include pdfPending so callers can poll again.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
formatNoOutput verbosity. Auto-detected if omitted.
targetNoSpecific target domain. Omit for audit-level aggregate.
auditIdYesAudit ID returned by brand_audit_batch_start.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / format
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Output verbosity. Auto-detected if omitted.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "full",
      +    "compact"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "properties": {
      -    "category": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    "checkStatus": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    "findings": {
      -      "items": {
      -        "additionalProperties": {},
      -        "properties": {},
      -        "type": "object"
      -      },
      -      "type": "array"
      -    },
      -    "partial": {
      -      "type": "boolean"
      -    },
      -    "passed": {
      -      "type": "boolean"
      -    },
      -    "score": {
      -      "type": "number"
      -    },
      -    "verdictWithheld": {
      -      "type": "boolean"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "required": [
      -    "category",
      -    "score",
      -    "passed",
      -    "findings"
      -  ],
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / verdictWithheld
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / checkStatus
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / partial
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "properties": {
      +    "category": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "findings": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": {},
      +        "properties": {},
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "passed": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "score": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "category",
      +    "score",
      +    "passed",
      +    "findings"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  6. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. The description adds meaningful contextual behavior: notReady for in-flight audits, pdfUrl authentication requirements, and pdfPending when a PDF is still rendering.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded, and each sentence carries distinct operational information about target behavior, readiness, and PDF sidecar handling. There is no redundant restatement of the tool name or title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description still explains the main return modes, readiness state, and PDF-related metadata. Combined with full parameter schema coverage and annotations, an agent has enough information to invoke and interpret this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds useful semantics for the target parameter by explaining that setting it returns a per-target CheckResult while omitting it returns the aggregate; format behavior is left to the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: fetch the result JSON for a completed brand audit. It also distinguishes target-level output from audit-level aggregate output, so the tool is clearly differentiated from status/start siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description makes clear this is for completed audits and explains the target-vs-aggregate branching. It does not explicitly name brand_audit_status as the alternative for polling an in-flight run, so routing guidance is strong but not fully explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.