Skip to main content
Glama

canadian-mortgage-deadlines

Server Details

Last day to make an offer and still fund inside a Canadian rate hold. Needs the expiry date.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.2/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming consistency is inherently maintained.

Tool Count4/5

One tool is on the low side, but for a very specific calculation (rate hold deadlines), it is reasonably scoped.

Completeness3/5

The server covers only rate hold deadlines, leaving out other common mortgage deadlines (e.g., closing deadlines), which are implied by the server name.

Available Tools

1 tool
rate_hold_deadlineAInspect

Canada: the last date an offer can be accepted so a mortgage still funds before a rate hold expires. A rate hold applies to the funding date, not the offer date, so the real deadline is weeks before the printed expiry. Requires the expiry date — it cannot be answered without one.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
amountYesMortgage amount in CAD
expiryYesRate hold expiry date, YYYY-MM-DD
heldRateYesThe rate being held, as a percent, e.g. 4.79
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses key behavioral insight: the real deadline is before the printed expiry due to rate hold applying to the funding date. This adds value beyond schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences deliver purpose, context, and a usage requirement with no wasted words. Information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description implies a date output but does not specify format. For a single-value calculation tool, this is acceptable but could be slightly more explicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 3 parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The description adds minimal additional meaning, only reiterating that expiry is required. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly defines the tool as computing the last acceptance date for a mortgage rate hold in Canada. It uses specific context ('Canada', 'last date an offer can be accepted') and distinguishes the tool's purpose from a simple expiry lookup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states the prerequisite ('Requires the expiry date'), guiding when to use the tool. However, no explicit when-not or alternatives are provided, though no siblings exist to compare.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources