A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceAssess your business's AI automation readiness across 20 industries. Get a personalized score, specific recommendations, and time/revenue impact estimates
2
13 npm
1
MIT
AI Rollout Framework
Server Details
90-day AI adoption framework for managers: overview, pricing, FAQ and an AI readiness assessment.
Ownership verified
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 99.9% over 21 days
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-06-18
- URL
- Repository
- airolloutframework/ai-rollout-framework-data
- GitHub Stars
- 0
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Tools have distinct primary purposes (assessment, course info, FAQ, overview, pricing, KB search), but get_faq and get_pricing overlap on pricing topics, and search_knowledge_base could overlap with FAQ/overview retrieval. Descriptions clarify boundaries, so misselection is unlikely but not impossible.
Naming Consistency5/5
All names use snake_case with a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, assess_, search_), and the purpose is clear from the name. No deviations.
Tool Count5/5
6 tools is well-scoped for an informational server covering assessment, pricing, course, FAQ, overview, and search; each tool earns its place.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers the main informational areas and read-only assessment, but lacks a direct way to retrieve the 16 assessment questions (agent must infer or search) and offers no detailed scoring breakdown by design. Minor gaps that can be worked around.
Available Tools
9 toolsassess_ai_readinessAI Readiness AssessmentRead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Runs the 16-question AI Readiness Score on the user's behalf (rate each statement 1-5, where 1 = Strongly Disagree and 5 = Strongly Agree) and returns their readiness stage, a recommended next step, and a link to the free full assessment on the site, which includes a personalized PDF. It returns no numeric score or breakdown. Ask the user the questions; do not guess answers.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| q1 | Yes | Leadership has discussed how AI may affect workflows, productivity, or service quality in our environment. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q2 | Yes | There is at least a basic understanding of why AI would be used here beyond general curiosity. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q3 | Yes | Someone is clearly responsible for evaluating AI opportunities or next steps. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q4 | Yes | AI discussion here is tied to outcomes, workflows, or risks rather than hype. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q5 | Yes | People generally understand what data should never be entered into public AI tools. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q6 | Yes | AI use is discussed with at least some awareness of policy, compliance, or reputational risk. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q7 | Yes | Important AI outputs would be reviewed before they are acted on or shared broadly. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q8 | Yes | There is at least a basic sense of what "safe experimentation" with AI looks like here. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q9 | Yes | We can identify at least one low-risk workflow where AI could improve speed, quality, or consistency. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q10 | Yes | People here could describe at least one current task that AI could meaningfully assist without major risk. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q11 | Yes | There is at least some awareness of how AI tool outputs should be reviewed before they affect real work. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q12 | Yes | If we piloted AI in one area today, we could define what success looks like in practical terms. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q13 | Yes | Most people here could use a basic AI tool with at least some practical confidence. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q14 | Yes | There is some shared understanding of what AI is - and is not - good at in a workplace context. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q15 | Yes | People here feel comfortable asking questions about AI without fear of looking uninformed. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) | |
| q16 | Yes | If a structured AI skill development path existed for our team, there would be genuine interest in using it. (Rate 1-5: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree.) |
email_me_the_kitEmail Me the KitIdempotentInspect
Emails the free Briefing Kit to an address the user gives you. Call only when the user has explicitly asked to receive it by email and agreed to be emailed. Never call it on your own and never invent or guess an address. It adds the address to a mailing list and sends the kit by email.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | The email address the user asked to receive the kit at. | ||
| consent | Yes | Must be true. Set it only if the user has explicitly asked to receive the kit by email and agreed to be emailed at this address. The user can unsubscribe from the first email. |
get_ai_at_work_courseAI at Work CourseRead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Returns the public outline of AI at Work, the employee AI training course: modules, what is included, seat tiers and the guarantee. Use it for questions about employee training. It does not return transcripts or quiz content. To check readiness, use assess_ai_readiness.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
get_faqFAQRead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Returns published questions and answers, optionally filtered by topic. Use it for specific questions about pricing, governance, implementation or the products. It does not search the long-form guides; use search_knowledge_base for that. To check readiness, use assess_ai_readiness.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| topic | No | Optional filter. Use a category for reliable results: "assessment", "implementation", "governance", "measurement", "concepts", "pricing", or "products". Any other value falls back to a free-text search over the questions and answers (e.g. "shadow AI", "refund"), which may return nothing. Omit to get all items. |
get_framework_overviewFramework OverviewRead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Returns the AI Capability Rollout Framework's three phases, four capability pillars, positioning, the recommended offer and the Discord community. Use it to explain what the framework is. It does not return prices or the FAQ. To check readiness, use assess_ai_readiness.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
get_pricingPricingRead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Returns current one-time prices and checkout links for the Framework + Executive Suite, the Framework alone, and AI at Work seats, including the seat tiers, co-branding and the Rollout Pack. Use it for the full price list, or get_seat_quote for a specific number of seats. It does not take payment. To check readiness, use assess_ai_readiness.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
get_seat_quoteSeat QuoteRead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Calculates the AI at Work cost for a given number of seats (1-500), with optional co-branding. It flags when a higher tier is cheaper in total and shows the Executive Suite and Rollout Pack alternatives. It does not take an order. To check readiness, use assess_ai_readiness.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| seats | Yes | Number of seats to quote, as a whole number. | |
| coBranding | No | Optional. True to include the company co-branding fee (free at higher seat counts). Defaults to false. |
get_starter_kitStarter Kit InfoRead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Describes the free AI Capability Briefing Kit, a 10-page internal briefing document, and how to get it. Use it when the user wants a free starting resource. It does not deliver the file; use email_me_the_kit when the user asks for it by email. To check readiness, use assess_ai_readiness.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
search_knowledge_baseKnowledge Base SearchRead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Searches the framework's methodology, definitions, positioning and changelog for a phrase and returns matching sections with links to the source documents. Use it for a concept the other tools do not cover. It returns excerpts, not full documents. To check readiness, use assess_ai_readiness.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Keyword or phrase to search for. |
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
- Added
email_me_the_kit - Added
get_seat_quote - Added
get_starter_kit
1 tool update
- Added
get_ai_at_work_course
5 tool updates
- First observed
assess_ai_readiness - First observed
get_faq - First observed
get_framework_overview - First observed
get_pricing - First observed
search_knowledge_base
Publisher details
- Operator
- AI Rollout Framework · Publisher source
- Operator website
- https://airolloutframework.com · Publisher source
- Vendor relationship
- First-party · Publisher source
- Trust center
- Not applicable
- Restrictions
- Not available
Related MCP Connectors
AI strategy, workflow automation, and process-improvement assessment for small businesses.
AI agent for business strategy and business design — run strategy missions and 15 analyses.
Can AI confidently recommend your business? The AI Recommendation Readiness Audit shows whether your
Scan any website for AI readiness — 100-point score across 6 AEO categories in seconds.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceHelps founders and teams review business workflows, identify AI opportunities, assess trust/control risks, and recommend a safe first AI-human workflow.970 npmCryptographic Autonomy 1.0 (Combined Work Exception)
AIReady MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to assess AI-readiness and improve AI leverage through analysis tools, resources, and prompts for project scanning and remediation.20 npmMIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to assess a small business's AI readiness (0–100 score), suggest tailored AI use cases, describe Essetech's services, and book a free consultation.411 npmMIT
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.