web-scraper
Server Details
Web tools for agents: fetch URL as markdown (free MCP) + x402 scrape, links, AI JSON, snapshot.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- agishub/agishub-mcp
- GitHub Stars
- 1
- Server Listing
- AgisHub MCP Server
Available Tools
1 toolextractAInspect
Fetch any public web page and return its main content as clean, token-efficient Markdown (title, description, headings, links, lists). Set render:true to execute JavaScript first for single-page apps or JS-heavy pages that would otherwise come back empty. Built for RAG and for agents that need to read the contents of a URL.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Full http/https URL of the page to extract. | |
| render | No | Render JavaScript with a headless browser before extracting (default false). Enable for SPAs / JS-heavy pages that return empty content otherwise. Slower. | |
| max_chars | No | Truncate the markdown to at most this many characters (sets truncated:true). | |
| include_links | No | Keep hyperlinks in the markdown output (default true). | |
| include_images | No | Keep images as markdown (default false). |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Mentions Markdown output and render behavior but lacks details on error handling, rate limits, or access restrictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with core purpose, second sentence explains key parameter. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Comprehensive for a web extraction tool with no siblings and no output schema. Covers main behavior and key parameter, though error handling and size limits are omitted.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. Description adds meaning by explaining render's purpose with performance trade-off and that max_chars sets truncated:true, exceeding schema detail.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool fetches any public web page and returns main content as Markdown, listing included elements. Verb+resource is specific and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides guidance on when to use render:true (SPAs/JS-heavy pages) and that it's slower. No sibling tools to differentiate, but context is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Fetch any URL as clean Markdown or metadata, and buy digital goods via x402 — for AI agents.
Read a URL as clean markdown, screenshot a website, url to PDF. Web access for agents, no signup.
MCP tools for AI agents: render URLs to image/PDF, check link health, convert HTML/CSV/JSON.
Web data tools for AI agents: pages as markdown, search, maps, commerce, jobs, AI answers.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to reliably fetch public web URLs and extract clean, agent-ready text, Markdown, links, and metadata, with automatic browser fallback and optional x402 payment support.-

@clawfetch/mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing web intelligence tools for AI agents, including fetching pages as markdown, rendering JS-heavy SPAs, extracting structured data, multi-source research, and domain availability checks, with automatic x402 micropayments.82MIT- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides 27 MCP-native tools for web scraping, crawling, deep research, and autonomous extraction, delivering clean Markdown and structured JSON from any website.293,6992MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for AI agents -- fetch any URL with full JavaScript rendering (Playwright/Chromium) and convert to clean, token-efficient markdown. Works on React, Vue, Angular, and any JS-heavy page. Includes web search, batch fetching, binary file download, LRU cache, SSRF protection, and structured output.25MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility for confusion between tools. The tool 'extract' has a clear and distinct purpose.
The single tool name 'extract' follows a verb pattern, which is consistent and appropriate for its action.
One tool for web scraping is somewhat thin, as a typical scraping workflow might involve multiple steps. However, the tool is comprehensive and covers the core use case, making it borderline appropriate.
The tool covers the primary need of fetching web pages and converting to Markdown, including JS rendering. Minor gaps like authentication or element-specific extraction exist but are workable.