Receipt Extraction
Server Details
AU GST/ABN receipt extraction — assigns entertainment/ITC tax codes per line, not just OCR.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- ACJLabs/receipt-extraction
- GitHub Stars
- 2
- Server Listing
- receipt-extraction
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 4/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
Only one tool exists, so no ambiguity between tools.
With a single tool, naming consistency is trivially perfect.
One tool is borderline; it covers the core extraction task but lacks any supporting functionality like listing or managing extractions.
The tool performs extraction well, but there are no tools for validation, retrieval, or batch operations, leaving significant gaps for a receipt extraction service.
Available Tools
1 toolextract_receiptExtract ReceiptARead-onlyInspect
Extracts a structured Receipt (vendor, ABN-checked, GST-aware line items and totals) from a base64-encoded receipt or invoice image/PDF.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mime_type | Yes | ||
| document_base64 | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | |
| totals | Yes | |
| vendor | Yes | |
| line_items | Yes | |
| schema_version | Yes |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=true, so the tool is safe for reading. The description adds behavioral context such as ABN-checking and GST-awareness, which are not in annotations. It does not cover rate limits or authentication, but given annotations provide a baseline, this is sufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, direct sentence of 17 words with no fluff. It is front-loaded with the core action and efficient in conveying the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given only two parameters, no siblings, and an output schema (not shown), the description covers the essential inputs and outputs. Missing details like allowed MIME types are minor. The description is generally complete for the tool's complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It implicitly explains that document_base64 is the base64-encoded content and mime_type is its type, but it does not list allowed MIME types or describe the base64 format. The description adds some meaning but not full clarity.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool extracts a structured Receipt with vendor, ABN-checked, and GST-aware details from base64-encoded images or PDFs. It provides specific verb and resource, and since there are no sibling tools, differentiation is not needed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when a receipt or invoice image is available but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (none exist) or when not to use it. No prerequisites or failure scenarios are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Servers
- Alicense-qualityCmaintenanceTurn any receipt into structured, accounting-ready JSON or clean Markdown with one API call. AI-powered vision extracts merchant, date, line items, tax, totals, and suggests GL accounts for instant bookkeeping. 50 free credits on signup.MIT

DocumentPro MCPofficial
Alicense-qualityCmaintenanceExtract structured, schema-typed data from invoices, purchase orders, receipts, and tax forms, and classify documents into custom label sets — via a hosted MCP server. Free tier included.MIT- Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to extract structured JSON from invoices and receipts in PDF and image formats using Claude Vision. Supports full document parsing, line item extraction, validation, and batch CSV export with API key or cryptocurrency payment options.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAccounting automation MCP server for Japanese tax firms. Two-stage classifier (keyword + Claude AI) with TaxRuleEngine for consumption tax, withholding, invoice system, and confidence-based routing.122MIT
Your Connectors
Sign in to create a connector for this server.