Skip to main content
Glama

Persnickety Try-On Index

Server Details

Find source-checked US boutiques with plus-size bridal samples physically available to try on.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.2/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming consistency is trivial; the name follows a clear verb_noun pattern.

Tool Count2/5

Having only one tool for what seems like a broader domain (bridal boutiques) is too few; additional tools for listing, details, or updates would be expected.

Completeness2/5

The server only provides a search tool; missing essential operations like listing boutiques or retrieving specific details, leaving significant gaps.

Available Tools

1 tool
find_bridal_samplesFind Plus-Size Bridal SamplesA
Read-onlyIdempotent
Inspect

Find source-checked US bridal boutiques where a requested plus-size wedding dress sample is published as physically available to try on. Results are not real-time; confirm before traveling.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNoBoutique, city, or state search text
sizeNoUS bridal sample size
stateNoTwo-letter US state code

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
dataYes
metaYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint. The description adds value beyond annotations by warning that results are not real-time and recommending confirmation, which informs agent behavior without contradicting structured data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: one for core functionality, one for critical caveat. Every sentence earns its place with no redundancy. Information is front-loaded and clearly structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three optional parameters, full schema coverage, output schema present, and annotations covering safety, the description provides adequate context. It defines scope and a caveat, though it omits details on result format or pagination (covered by output schema).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with all parameter descriptions present. The description does not add significant meaning beyond the schema; it only contextualizes 'q' as 'Boutique, city, or state search text' which matches the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the action (find), resource (source-checked US bridal boutiques), and constraints (plus-size wedding dress sample physically available). This is a specific verb+resource combination with no sibling ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit guidance on when to use (to find physically available samples) and a critical usage note ('Results are not real-time; confirm before traveling'). No exclusions or alternatives needed as there are no sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources