knowledge
Server Details
Knowledge Base von designare.at – Michael Kanda, Web & KI aus Wien. Semantische Suche über RAG.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 100.0% over 78 days
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-03-26
- URL
- Repository
- michael-kanda/designare
- GitHub Stars
- 0
- ChatGPT
- –
- Claude
- –
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
get_services returns a fixed, canonical competence profile, while search_knowledge performs semantic retrieval across the knowledge base. The purposes are mostly distinct, though both can answer overlapping questions about Michael Kanda/designare.at, so an agent might occasionally choose search when the profile tool would be more direct.
Both tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_services and search_knowledge. The legacy name get_services is explicitly explained in the description, so it does not break predictability.
Two tools is thin for a knowledge server, even a narrow one. The surface is coherent, but additional operations such as listing articles or fetching a specific page could reasonably earn a place.
The server covers the core read-only needs: retrieving the canonical profile and searching the knowledge base semantically. Minor gaps exist, such as direct retrieval by page slug or listing all articles/projects, but search largely compensates for these.
Available Tools
2 toolsget_servicesARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Liefert das belegbare Kompetenz- und Projektprofil von Michael Kanda / designare.at: Person, Fachfelder, typische Aufgaben, Ergebnisse, Produkte, Open-Source-Werkzeuge und kanonische Belegseiten. Der technische Tool-Name bleibt aus Kompatibilitätsgründen get_services. Nutze das Tool für Fragen wie "Was macht designare.at?" oder "Welche Projekte und Fachgebiete hat Michael Kanda?".
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| products | Yes | |
| provider | Yes | |
| provenance | Yes | |
| lastUpdated | Yes | |
| schemaVersion | Yes | |
| competenceAreas | Yes | |
| openSourceTools | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already establish that this is a read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world operation, so the description does not need to repeat safety semantics. It adds useful behavioral context by specifying the profile content and canonical evidence pages, though it does not discuss output format or any access constraints.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with what the tool returns, then gives example use cases, with a brief compatibility note about the technical name. It is appropriately sized for a no-parameter tool, though the compatibility sentence is slightly meta and could be trimmed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the empty input schema, rich annotations, and the presence of an output schema, the description is nearly complete: it explains the content and typical questions. The main missing context is sibling routing, since an agent may also consider search_knowledge for related queries.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description correctly does not invent parameter semantics, and the empty schema is consistent with a parameterless profile retrieval tool.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns a specific resource: the verifiable competence and project profile of Michael Kanda / designare.at, including person, fields, tasks, results, products, open-source tools, and evidence pages. It also explains the otherwise misleading technical name, but it does not explicitly distinguish this tool from the sibling search_knowledge.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives concrete example questions that should trigger this tool, such as 'Was macht designare.at?' and 'Welche Projekte und Fachgebiete hat Michael Kanda?'. It does not state when to use search_knowledge instead or provide exclusions, so it is clear but not fully routing-aware.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_knowledgeAInspect
Semantische Suche in der designare.at Knowledge Base. Findet relevante Informationen über Michael Kanda, seine Web- und KI-Kompetenzfelder, Projekte, Blog-Artikel und Expertise. Nutze dieses Tool wenn du Fragen über designare.at, WordPress, SEO, GEO (Generative Engine Optimization), KI-Sichtbarkeit oder Michael Kandas Arbeit beantworten willst.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Die Suchanfrage in natürlicher Sprache (deutsch oder englisch). Beispiele: "Womit beschäftigt sich Michael Kanda?", "Was ist GEO?", "Welche WordPress-Projekte gibt es?" |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden; it does disclose that retrieval is semantic rather than keyword-based, which is genuinely useful context for query phrasing. It says nothing about result volume, ranking behavior, latency, or whether the corpus is read-only, leaving the mutation/return profile to inference.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose before the usage trigger, with essentially no filler. The topic enumeration is slightly listy but each item helps an agent decide whether to route here.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a one-parameter, non-destructive lookup with no output schema, the description covers purpose, corpus scope, and when to invoke it. The remaining gap is the boundary with get_services and any hint about result shape, which is minor at this complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and the single `query` parameter already carries language guidance and three worked examples, so the schema does the heavy lifting. The description adds topical context about what queries will hit but no additional syntax, scope, or format guidance beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description names a specific verb+resource pair ("Semantische Suche in der designare.at Knowledge Base") and enumerates the content domains covered (projects, blog articles, expertise). It does not explicitly distinguish itself from the sibling get_services, so an agent must infer the boundary rather than being told it.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
"Nutze dieses Tool wenn du Fragen über ... beantworten willst" gives a concrete, topic-level trigger list (designare.at, WordPress, SEO, GEO, KI-Sichtbarkeit), which is clear positive guidance. No exclusions or named alternatives are given, so the agent has no stated rule for when to prefer the sibling instead.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
- Changed
get_services7 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / competenceAreasAdded value: +{ + "items": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string" + }, + "evidenceUrls": { + "items": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "outcomes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "problemsSolved": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "relevantFor": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "url": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "name", + "description", + "url", + "relevantFor", + "problemsSolved", + "outcomes", + "evidenceUrls" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" +} - removed
Output schema / properties / provider / properties / areaServedRemoved value: -{ - "items": { - "type": "string" - }, - "type": "array" -} - added
Output schema / properties / provider / properties / geographicContextAdded value: +{ + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" +} - added
Output schema / properties / provider / properties / scopeNoteAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / provider / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "type", - "name", - "profileType", - "professionalRole", - "tagline", - "profileUrl", - "brand", - "location", - "areaServed", - "languages", - "contactUrl", - "sameAs" -]New value: +[ + "type", + "name", + "profileType", + "scopeNote", + "professionalRole", + "tagline", + "profileUrl", + "brand", + "location", + "geographicContext", + "languages", + "contactUrl", + "sameAs" +] - removed
Output schema / properties / servicesRemoved value: -{ - "items": { - "additionalProperties": false, - "properties": { - "description": { - "type": "string" - }, - "evidenceUrls": { - "items": { - "format": "uri", - "type": "string" - }, - "type": "array" - }, - "id": { - "type": "string" - }, - "name": { - "type": "string" - }, - "outcomes": { - "items": { - "type": "string" - }, - "type": "array" - }, - "problemsSolved": { - "items": { - "type": "string" - }, - "type": "array" - }, - "targetAudience": { - "items": { - "type": "string" - }, - "type": "array" - }, - "url": { - "format": "uri", - "type": "string" - } - }, - "required": [ - "id", - "name", - "description", - "url", - "targetAudience", - "problemsSolved", - "outcomes", - "evidenceUrls" - ], - "type": "object" - }, - "type": "array" -} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "schemaVersion", - "lastUpdated", - "provider", - "services", - "products", - "openSourceTools", - "provenance" -]New value: +[ + "schemaVersion", + "lastUpdated", + "provider", + "competenceAreas", + "products", + "openSourceTools", + "provenance" +]
2 tool updates
- Changed
get_services2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / provider / properties / profileTypeAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / provider / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "type", - "name", - "professionalRole", - "tagline", - "profileUrl", - "brand", - "location", - "areaServed", - "languages", - "contactUrl", - "sameAs" -]New value: +[ + "type", + "name", + "profileType", + "professionalRole", + "tagline", + "profileUrl", + "brand", + "location", + "areaServed", + "languages", + "contactUrl", + "sameAs" +]
- Changed
search_knowledge1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / query / descriptionPrevious value: -"Die Suchanfrage in natürlicher Sprache (deutsch oder englisch). Beispiele: \"Welche SEO-Leistungen bietet designare.at?\", \"Was ist GEO?\", \"Webdesign Wien\""New value: +"Die Suchanfrage in natürlicher Sprache (deutsch oder englisch). Beispiele: \"Womit beschäftigt sich Michael Kanda?\", \"Was ist GEO?\", \"Welche WordPress-Projekte gibt es?\""
1 tool update
- Changed
get_services2 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "lastUpdated": { + "format": "date", + "type": "string" + }, + "openSourceTools": { + "items": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string" + }, + "evidenceUrl": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + }, + "id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "repositoryUrl": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "name", + "description", + "repositoryUrl", + "evidenceUrl" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "products": { + "items": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "category": { + "type": "string" + }, + "description": { + "type": "string" + }, + "id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "status": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "name", + "category", + "description", + "url", + "status" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "provenance": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "canonicalProfile": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + }, + "note": { + "type": "string" + }, + "source": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "source", + "canonicalProfile", + "note" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "provider": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "areaServed": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "brand": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "name", + "url" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "contactUrl": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + }, + "languages": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "location": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "city": { + "type": "string" + }, + "country": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "city", + "country" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "professionalRole": { + "type": "string" + }, + "profileUrl": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + }, + "sameAs": { + "items": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "tagline": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "type", + "name", + "professionalRole", + "tagline", + "profileUrl", + "brand", + "location", + "areaServed", + "languages", + "contactUrl", + "sameAs" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "schemaVersion": { + "type": "string" + }, + "services": { + "items": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string" + }, + "evidenceUrls": { + "items": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "outcomes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "problemsSolved": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "targetAudience": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "url": { + "format": "uri", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "name", + "description", + "url", + "targetAudience", + "problemsSolved", + "outcomes", + "evidenceUrls" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "schemaVersion", + "lastUpdated", + "provider", + "services", + "products", + "openSourceTools", + "provenance" + ], + "type": "object" +}
2 tool updates
- First observed
get_services - First observed
search_knowledge
Related MCP Connectors
Search and read bitspire.ch: .NET development, AI agents, trainings and blog by BitSpire GmbH
Recall (recall.it) — your AI knowledge base / 'second brain'. Via the official API: semantic search
blicht.com knowledge platform: full-text search + Markdown articles (e-commerce, AI, lifestyle)
AI 與科技名詞白話解釋、概念比較與入門教學(繁體中文)。
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered access to authoritative design systems knowledge, including W3C standards, WCAG guidelines, and best practices from 188+ curated entries via semantic vector search.6 npm224MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides AI agents with instant access to official Apple developer documentation, Swift docs, design guidelines, and Apple Developer YouTube content through advanced semantic and hybrid search capabilities. Features AI-powered reranking for accurate retrieval of Apple platform knowledge including iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and visionOS development resources.5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve information from your knowledge base using RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) with hybrid search, document indexing, and ChromaDB vector storage.29 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides semantic search and knowledge base management for the micro-app micro-frontend framework by ingesting its source code and documentation.18MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.