triageshield
Server Details
Verify a vuln report's file/line/function claims against a real GitHub repo.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 100.0% over the last 24 hours
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-03-26
- URL
- ChatGPT
- –
- Claude
- –
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of overlap or misselection, and the tool's purpose is stated with unusual precision (it checks concrete cited claims, explicitly not vulnerability validity). An agent cannot confuse it with anything else in this surface.
The single name, check_vuln_report, follows a clean snake_case verb_noun convention and reads clearly. It is consistent by construction, though a one-tool set cannot demonstrate a repeatable pattern across the surface.
A single tool is thin even for a narrow purpose, and the server name 'triageshield' implies broader triage activity than one check operation. It is borderline rather than mismatched, since claim verification is genuinely a single focused check.
For the narrow claim-verification task the surface is reasonably covered, but the 'triage' framing suggests missing operations: no severity/exploitability assessment, no summarization of which claims failed, and no repo-inspection helper. Agents hitting those needs will dead-end.
Available Tools
1 toolcheck_vuln_reportAInspect
Verify a vulnerability report's concrete, checkable claims (file paths, file.py:123 line citations, function names) against a real GitHub repo's current default-branch state. Does NOT judge whether the described vulnerability is real or exploitable -- it only checks whether the files/lines/functions cited actually exist, which is the exact 'AI slop' failure mode (hallucinated specifics) that makes up a real share of auto-generated vuln reports. A PLAUSIBLE verdict means the claims check out, not that the vulnerability is confirmed real.
Inputs: repo (required), report (required).
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
Related MCP Connectors
Verify a vuln report's file/line/function claims against a real GitHub repo.
Scan a public GitHub repo, explain risks, get fix prompts and rescan to confirm fixes.
Scan a GitHub repository for vulnerabilities, with proof for every finding, from your coding agent.
Independent static verification for exact immutable public GitHub commits.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceScans GitHub repositories for security vulnerabilities by cloning, performing static analysis, secret detection, build verification, and AI-powered OWASP-aligned code review, producing a scored SECURITY.md report.-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceClones and inspects public GitHub repositories to extract evidence like manifests, dependencies, and version hints, and can run allow-listed repos in isolated Docker containers for reproducible verification.4-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables read-only, evidence-led security audits of GitHub-hosted source code through explicit workflow primitives: repository reconnaissance, coverage-ledger planning, heuristic candidate leads, structured findings validation, independent verification gates, and JSON/Markdown report generation. It never clones, executes, or probes the target code, and marks runs incomplete until coverage and reviewer-verification gates pass.14AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes repository reconnaissance tools — file listing and verbatim reading, regex search, dependency-tree parsing across Python/Node/Rust/Go, and test-coverage ingestion — so agents can gather line-numbered evidence from real source files. This lets an audit pipeline physically re-verify every claim and drop findings that cannot be located in the code.MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.