Status

The two evaluate_* tools are the closest pair, but the descriptions clearly separate audience-level permission (evaluate_audience) from exact-wording approval (evaluate_customer_update). The list_approved_causes / list_approved_statements / list_statement_limits trio and the corresponding save_* tools each target a distinct artifact type. get_status_context vs search_incident_states overlap somewhat (both surface incident states), but one is context retrieval and the other is paged search.

All 13 tools use a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern: create_status_board, list_status_boards, get_status_context, save_approved_cause, evaluate_customer_update, search_incident_states, etc. The verb prefixes (create/list/get/save/evaluate/search) map predictably onto action types. No camelCase or mixed-convention deviations.

13 tools sit comfortably in the well-scoped band and match the domain's distinct entity types (boards, causes, statements, limits, incident states) plus evaluation and read paths. There is mild redundancy—get_status_context already returns approved causes/timelines/workarounds that the three list_* tools expose separately—but nothing feels padded.

The core governance lifecycle is covered: create/list boards, save and read approved causes, statements, limits, and incident states, plus audience and wording evaluation. Gaps are revocation-oriented—there is no delete/update for boards and no way to retract or expire a previously approved cause/statement/limit, which matters for a governance surface. Agents can work around this by writing a superseding approval, so it is a minor rather than blocking gap.