Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

AI-to-AI petrol station. 56 pay-per-call endpoints covering market signals, crypto/DeFi, geopolitics, earnings, insider trades, SEC filings, sanctions screening, ArXiv research, whale tracking, and more. Micropayments in USDC on Base Mainnet via x402 protocol.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables detection and analysis of pre-public product launches through web search, content extraction, AI-powered scoring, and automated alerting. Provides comprehensive tools for surfacing stealth startup signals before they trend publicly.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Browse IndustryLens's published competitive-intelligence reports and head-to-head competitor comparisons from any AI agent — real, source-backed data.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI chat clients to perform market research and competitive intelligence by gathering company overviews, competitor lists, product portfolios, pricing snapshots, and recent news via live Tavily search.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

The tools cover distinct domains (e.g., AI compliance, market data, crypto), but there is significant overlap in some areas. For example, get_ai_news, get_arxiv_research, and get_github_trending all provide AI intelligence, while multiple tools (get_company_profile, get_b2b_intel, get_github_velocity) analyze company AI activity, which could cause confusion. Descriptions help differentiate, but the sheer number of tools with similar purposes creates ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, using snake_case uniformly. All tools start with 'get_', 'run_', 'check_', or 'screen_', followed by a descriptive noun phrase (e.g., get_ai_patents, run_bundle_macro_global). This predictability makes the set easy to navigate and understand.

Tool Count2/5

With 56 tools, the set is excessively large for a single server, even given its broad 'omni-service' scope. Many tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple AI intelligence tools into fewer endpoints), and the count feels overwhelming for agents to manage effectively. This suggests poor scoping and prioritization.

Completeness4/5

The tool set is remarkably comprehensive across AI, finance, crypto, geopolitics, and compliance, with few obvious gaps. Bundles like run_bundle_sovereign aggregate endpoints effectively. However, some domains (e.g., AI compliance) lack update or delete operations, and the breadth may lead to superficial coverage in niche areas, but overall it provides extensive coverage.

Resources