Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

AI-to-AI petrol station. 56 pay-per-call endpoints covering market signals, crypto/DeFi, geopolitics, earnings, insider trades, SEC filings, sanctions screening, ArXiv research, whale tracking, and more. Micropayments in USDC on Base Mainnet via x402 protocol.

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.5/5 across 56 of 56 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation3/5

The tools cover distinct domains (e.g., AI compliance, market data, crypto), but there is significant overlap in some areas. For example, get_ai_news, get_arxiv_research, and get_github_trending all provide AI intelligence, while multiple tools (get_company_profile, get_b2b_intel, get_github_velocity) analyze company AI activity, which could cause confusion. Descriptions help differentiate, but the sheer number of tools with similar purposes creates ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, using snake_case uniformly. All tools start with 'get_', 'run_', 'check_', or 'screen_', followed by a descriptive noun phrase (e.g., get_ai_patents, run_bundle_macro_global). This predictability makes the set easy to navigate and understand.

Tool Count2/5

With 56 tools, the set is excessively large for a single server, even given its broad 'omni-service' scope. Many tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple AI intelligence tools into fewer endpoints), and the count feels overwhelming for agents to manage effectively. This suggests poor scoping and prioritization.

Completeness4/5

The tool set is remarkably comprehensive across AI, finance, crypto, geopolitics, and compliance, with few obvious gaps. Bundles like run_bundle_sovereign aggregate endpoints effectively. However, some domains (e.g., AI compliance) lack update or delete operations, and the breadth may lead to superficial coverage in niche areas, but overall it provides extensive coverage.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources