Skip to main content
Glama

Compare savings accounts

compare_savings_accounts
Read-only

List savings account options from the SecureLend catalog. This tool takes no inputs.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / amount
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Requested amount.",
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / creditScore
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Credit score used to filter options.",
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / homePrice
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Property value for a mortgage comparison.",
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / loanAmount
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Requested amount.",
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / principal
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Principal when loanAmount is omitted.",
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / purpose
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "What the amount is for.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / state
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "US state.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -trueNew value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties
      Added value: +{
      +  "amount": {
      +    "description": "Requested amount.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "creditScore": {
      +    "description": "Credit score used to filter options.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "homePrice": {
      +    "description": "Property value for a mortgage comparison.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "loanAmount": {
      +    "description": "Requested amount.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "principal": {
      +    "description": "Principal when loanAmount is omitted.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "purpose": {
      +    "description": "What the amount is for.",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "state": {
      +    "description": "US state.",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  }
      +}
  3. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +true
    • removedInput schema / properties
      Removed value: -{
      -  "initialDeposit": {
      -    "description": "The initial deposit amount in USD.",
      -    "type": "number"
      -  }
      -}
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      -  "additionalProperties": false,
      -  "properties": {
      -    "metadata": {
      -      "additionalProperties": false,
      -      "properties": {
      -        "queryId": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "sessionId": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "timestamp": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        }
      -      },
      -      "required": [
      -        "queryId",
      -        "timestamp"
      -      ],
      -      "type": "object"
      -    },
      -    "offers": {
      -      "items": {
      -        "additionalProperties": false,
      -        "properties": {
      -          "accountId": {
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          "apy": {
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          "imageUrl": {
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          "interestRate": {
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          "issuer": {
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          "minBalanceForApy": {
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          "monthlyFee": {
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          "name": {
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          "rating": {
      -            "maximum": 5,
      -            "minimum": 0,
      -            "type": "number"
      -          }
      -        },
      -        "required": [
      -          "accountId",
      -          "name",
      -          "issuer",
      -          "imageUrl",
      -          "rating",
      -          "apy",
      -          "minBalanceForApy",
      -          "monthlyFee"
      -        ],
      -        "type": "object"
      -      },
      -      "type": "array"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "required": [
      -    "offers",
      -    "metadata"
      -  ],
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  4. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false; the description's one contributing fact is that results come from the internal SecureLend catalog, which reinforces the closed-world hint. It does not say what a result record contains (rates, fees, terms) or whether all accounts are returned in one call, which matters since there is no output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, purpose front-loaded, zero filler. Nothing could be removed without losing information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries the burden of describing return values, yet it only says 'list options' — no indication of the fields (interest rate, minimum balance, fees) or result count. For a simple no-arg tool this is workable but leaves the agent guessing what comes back.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The sentence 'This tool takes no inputs' is redundant with the empty schema but confirms the agent cannot filter or page, which is mildly useful.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('List') and resource ('savings account options from the SecureLend catalog'), and the product noun implicitly separates it from the many other compare_* siblings covering loans, mortgages and credit cards. It does not explicitly name an alternative, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the product name; there is no statement of when to pick this over compare_personal_banking or compare_business_banking, and no prerequisites or exclusions. Adequate for an obvious zero-input catalog lookup, but nothing routes the agent explicitly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources