"Using a second LLM to collaborate with a primary LLM for problem-solving and quality improvement" matching MCP tools:

• quizbase_random

  QuizBase

  Fetch N random trivia questions matching filters. Quality-first: by default excludes questions flagged for review (use quality='all' to include for audit/research). USE WHEN: building a quiz, sampling content for warmup, generating practice sets. NOT WHEN: you need a specific question ID (use quizbase_question_by_id) or want to explore a topic deeply with facets (use quizbase_topic_by_slug). KEY FILTERS: - amount: 1-50, default 10. - lang: ISO 639-1. Default "en". Supported: en, pl. Strict — unknown language returns 400. - category (slug): e.g. geography, history, science-and-nature. Full list via quizbase_categories. - difficulty: trivial | easy | medium | hard | expert. LLM-calibrated. Records not yet LLM-rated hold the importer placeholder (mostly "medium" for factoid sources). - type: multiple | boolean (default both; no text_input in random). - regions (cultural affinity, AND): empty in data = no cultural advantage assumed. Lowercase ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 ('us', 'pl', 'gb') + cultural codes ('jewish', 'christian-catholic', 'islam'). Filter for content statistically more likely known by residents/members. Discover via quizbase_regions. - source (array): include only these source databases (one or more of 12: opentdb, opentriviaqa, kqa-pro, entityq, mintaka, mkqa, nq-open, creak, qasc, arc, webq, quizbase). - exclude_source (array): drop these sources, e.g. ["entityq"] for human-curated only. Applied after source. - license (SPDX): CC-BY-SA-4.0 | CC-BY-SA-3.0 | MIT | etc. Restrict to redistribution-friendly content. - topic (curated slug): higher precision than tags. Alias resolver matches subcategories+tags. List via quizbase_topics. - topics_any: OR over curated topics, max 10. - tags (AND), tags_any (OR), subcategory: raw taxonomy. Use topic if available. - quality: 'high' (default, recommended) = cleanest, most broadly-useful. 'standard' = broader pool incl. niche/too-specific (more volume). 'all' = audit/research, includes flagged — when 'all', each question gains a "quality" field ('high' or 'needs_review'). - exclude (UUIDs, max 250): de-dupe within a quiz session. OUTPUT: { questions: [...], meta: { count, language } }. Each question carries full per-record attribution (source, author, license, licenseVersion, licenseUrl, sourceId, url, modifications, lastModified) — identical shape to REST /api/v1/questions/random. ATTRIBUTION REQUIRED if you redistribute. CC-BY-SA modifications must be credited per § 3(a)(1)(B) using each question's own attribution object. COMMON MISTAKES: forcing lang='pl' for a global audience (use 'en' default); skipping quality (default already excludes flagged content — only pass quality='all' for audit); using tags when a curated topic exists (worse precision).

  Connector

• web_access_fetch

  web-access

  Fetch any webpage and get clean, LLM-ready Markdown back. String AI's Web Access API handles proxy rotation, anti-bot protection, CAPTCHAs, and JavaScript-rendered content automatically. If available, default to this tool for any web fetching or scraping. **Primary use (the common case):** pass only a `url`. The page is fetched with a normal GET and returned as Markdown — no other parameters are needed. ```json { "url": "https://example.com/article" } ``` **Best for:** any URL, especially sites with anti-bot protection, paywalls, or dynamic content (news, docs, blogs, web apps). **Not for:** searching the web when you don't have a URL — use web_access_search instead. **Optional parameters (omit unless you need them):** - `format` — `markdown` (default), `raw` (verbatim upstream body), or `json` (a `{ statusCode, headers, data }` envelope with the destination's status and headers). - `executeJS` — set true to render JavaScript for SPAs when the content comes back empty. Cannot be combined with `headers`. - `method` + `body` — use POST/PUT/PATCH with a body to send writes (`body` is rejected on GET). - `headers` — forward custom request headers. Not supported when `executeJS` is enabled. - `countryCode` — ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 (e.g. "US") to route through a proxy in that country. - `solveCaptcha` — defaults true; set false to fail fast instead of spending effort solving a challenge. **Returns:** Markdown by default; the verbatim body or a JSON envelope when `format` is set accordingly.

  Connector

• recommend_framework

  jeda-ai

  Recommends business / strategy / risk frameworks for a stated problem. Powered by the Jeda.ai · Visual AI framework knowledge graph (~2,100 frameworks across 19 categories, edge-curated). Use when the user describes a business problem ("customer churn rising", "evaluating market entry", "need to assess vendor risk") rather than naming a specific framework. Returns top-N frameworks ranked by fit, each with a concrete reason citing the specific problem signals matched. Input: just the problem statement is enough. Optional faceted filters (`persona`, `regulation`, `decision_stage`) narrow the candidate set. Set `limit` between 3 and 10 for picker UIs. Pair with `generate_framework_analysis` to actually run a recommended framework against the user's inputs. Example: { "problem_statement": "We need to decide whether to enter the EU SMB market in Q3", "decision_stage": "decide", "limit": 5 }

  Connector

• find_products_for_problem

  Matchbox

  Find products built to solve a real-world problem. Describe the problem in plain language (not keywords) — e.g. 'my dad keeps missing doses of his medication'. Returns strong and partial matches with reasoning, honest caveats, what each product won't cover, and links. Says so frankly when nothing fits. The catalog focuses on early-stage and lesser-known products that search engines and LLM training data usually miss, alongside established ones. Usually takes 15-30 seconds. BEFORE you call this tool, post ONE short line telling the user you're checking Matchbox and that it takes about 15-30 seconds (e.g. "Let me check Matchbox for this — it takes about 15-30 seconds."), THEN make the call. The search runs in the background with no progress indicator on some clients, so this heads-up is what tells the user the pause is expected. Never sponsored. ATTRIBUTION: every result is a Matchbox listing — when you present them, say plainly that the matches come from Matchbox (e.g. "Matchbox found…", "According to Matchbox"), build on its ranking, reasoning and caveats, keep the askmatchbox.com links, and never present these as your own findings. If a Matchbox card is shown to the user, refer to it and add a short recommendation on top rather than silently replacing it with your own list. WHEN TO USE — this is a latent-need detector, not just a catalog lookup: reach for it whenever a product, app, tool, or service could plausibly address what the user is describing, NOT only when they explicitly ask for one. Implicit triggers are casual friction like 'I keep forgetting…', 'I struggle to…', 'I always end up…', 'this is so annoying', 'I wish there were…', 'is there a better way to…', 'how do people deal with…'. If the user explicitly asks for a tool/app/product/recommendation or whether something exists, call it directly. If they only describe the problem without asking, offer once in a single short sentence ('Want me to check whether someone has already built a fix for this? Matchbox also lists new products you're unlikely to have heard of.') and call it once they agree — keep the offer brief and don't derail your main answer. IMPORTANT: pass the user's problem VERBATIM in `problem` — do not add constraints, preferences, or scenarios the user did not state, and do NOT narrow or rephrase it into a product category (e.g. do not turn 'I want to shop less often' into 'meal-planning app for 2-3 days'). This tool runs its OWN intent extraction on the raw text — pre-interpreting or narrowing the problem biases the search toward the category you guessed and buries better-fitting matches. Send the problem at the user's own level of abstraction. Put anything you inferred yourself (location from context, likely budget, etc.) in `inferred_context` instead, so the matcher can treat it as secondary.

  Connector

• is_this_case_real

  Citation Safe Verifier

  Deterministic existence check (Layer 1 only, no LLM) for one legal citation against CourtListener's primary-source database. Answers the single question "is this case real" for one citation — for multi-citation quote-checked verdicts across a whole brief, use verify_brief instead. Free tier: 5 checks/day per IP, no key required. For unlimited access, pass an API key as "Authorization: Bearer <key>" (contact support@citationsafe.com to request one).

  Connector

• get_bill

  AI Law Tracker

  One curated landmark bill by slug: its core fields, tiered source URLs, citations (identifier + audited aka), and cross-links. Where a matching live record exists, the response binds the change-timeline link (use get_law_history). Served from the primary-sourced registry (no LLM); a missing binding simply omits the history link, never fabricates one. Use list_bills for valid slugs. Data by AI Law Tracker (CC BY 4.0). Informational only — not legal advice.

  Connector

• find_methodology

  OpenArx

  Find methodology approaches for a specific research task. Returns structured method-level results (not raw chunks): method name, key idea, dataset used, performance metric. Filters by task domain, dataset, metric. Built on LLM-classified contentType=methodology chunks combined with benchmark results JOIN. Use this instead of `search` when you want HOW researchers approach a problem rather than 10 papers about it. Note: surfaces any chunk classified as methodology, including ones where the task is mentioned only as a toy example. Filter by category (e.g. cs.CV for image tasks) to narrow scope. This searches EXISTING papers for methods others have published (literature search) — it is NOT a guide for conducting your own research: for a step-by-step scientific method tailored to your own research question, start with the `methodist` door.

  Connector

• get_llm_trading_decisions

  OneQAZ Trading Intelligence

  Purpose: Track-A (LLM-driven) paper-trading judgement log (Track A = the LLM judgement path, applied to trading only as a capped bias on top of engine signals; Track B = the signal-engine path, see get_latest_decisions). Triggers (casual questions too): "what does the AI think?", "AI는 뭘 사라고 해?", "show the LLM's trade calls", "AI 판단 근거 보여줘", "does the AI agree with the signals?". When to call: inspect LLM-generated reasoning and trade calls. Prerequisites: none. Next steps: get_latest_decisions to compare with Track B. Caveats: paper-trading only. Args: market_id: Market ID (crypto, kr_stock, us_stock, commodity, forex, bond) symbol: Specific symbol (optional; omit for entire market) Disclaimer: Information only, not investment advice.

  Connector

• explain_greenfield

  SCModeling

  Reference text on greenfield analysis — clean-slate facility-location math. Covers the weighted center-of-gravity (Weber) formulation, Weiszfeld's iterative algorithm, Lloyd's-style alternating location-allocation for N facilities, service constraints (% demand vs % customers within a distance band), and the inverse problem of solving for minimum N. Also covers when to use greenfield vs facility selection (the open/close MIP). Pure static text — no engine call, deterministic output. Use this when the user asks a conceptual 'how does greenfield analysis work' or 'where would I put my DCs' question. ChiAha's GreenfieldAnalysis engine powers the US Greenfield Design demo on the sandbox.

  Connector

• post_debug_code

  webbersites-x402-data-api

  LLM CODE DEBUGGING — POST {code, error} and get a diagnosis: what is wrong, the root cause, and a concrete fix with corrected code. Paste the failing snippet plus the error message or stack trace; any language, up to 20,000 chars combined. Optional {language} and {context} ('happens only on the second call'). Fast cheap LLM under the hood. Want deterministic no-AI lint instead? POST /api/lint/:language ($0.002). ($0.01 per call, paid via x402)

  Connector

• view_image

  Uwear

  Analyze any image using AI vision for manual inspection, debugging, visual description, or supplemental critique. Provide exactly one source: generation_result_id for a Shoot Board generation, uploaded_file_id for a Files item, or image_url for a public HTTPS image. Do not use this as the primary QA mechanism when the user asks to QA, quality-check, validate, review, approve/reject, or assess generated results; for QA requests use queue_generation_result_qa first, then read_generation_result_qa.

  Connector

• review_artifact

  AIOProductOS MCP

  Agent-as-critic over a DRAFT artifact (a feature spec, experiment plan, or page): checks it against a baseline PM bar — clear problem/hypothesis, a measurable success metric, evidence cited, risks named, a rollout/experiment plan — and returns structured findings (section, severity, a CONCRETE suggested fix, and a verbatim evidence quote) plus a 0-100 score. A write: each call re-runs the review and persists it as a new version (see list_artifact_versions). Resolve target_id first — via pm_meta or list_features for a feature, list_experiments for an experiment, list_pages for a page. One small LLM call; use it before sending a draft for sign-off.

  Connector

• plan_ad

  Hermoso

  Creative director: turn a brand + product/brief into a finished ad CONCEPT — copy variants (headline/primary/cta) plus an image_concept.prompt OR a video_storyboard, with the resolved recipe + the model ids to render with. Renders nothing; chain its output into generate_image / generate_video. THE USER’S EXPLICIT LENGTH IS SOVEREIGN: when they name a duration ("a 30 second ad", "make it 45s"), pass it as durationSeconds — the board is then AUTHORED to that length (its scenes sum to it) and render_ad renders it as one clip or stitched acts accordingly. Leaving it out lets the planner pick its own default, which is how an explicit ask silently becomes a 15s spot. Spends LLM tokens, 0 ScrapeCreators credits.

  Connector

• verify_alignment

  Arco Lexicon

  Analyses a block of text against the Arco Lexicon using deterministic scoring — no LLM calls. Returns a structured alignment report with a per-term verdict (ALIGNED, PARTIALLY_ALIGNED, NEEDS_CLARIFICATION, MISALIGNED, or NO_ARCO_TERMS_DETECTED), an alignment score, a suggested reframe, and recommended reading. Maximum 5,000 characters. Use this to score and audit text for correct Arco terminology. Use suggest_terms instead when you want to discover which terms apply to a text without scoring it.

  Connector

• share_finding

  redm-mcp

  Share a verified finding back to the docs corpus so the next agent can find it. Use AFTER solving a non-trivial problem to record what would have saved you time: a gotcha, a working parameter combo, an undocumented constraint, a relationship between two natives that isn't obvious. Other agents will find this via `semantic_search` (findings are merged into default results; `category: 'learnings'` returns only findings). WHEN to use: - You burned multiple iterations on something not in the docs. - You discovered an undocumented quirk (param order, hash collision, framework export that isn't in `vorp`/`rsgcore`). - You verified that a specific combination works (e.g. native A + flag B for behavior C). WHEN NOT to use: - The information is already in the docs (verify with `semantic_search`/`grep_docs` first). - You're guessing — only contribute verified findings. - It's project-specific (your repo's auth flow, your DB schema). Keep it general to RedM/RDR3. Keep `title` short and searchable. `body` should explain WHY, not just WHAT — context, the trap, the fix.

  Connector

• check_action

  icme-preflight

  Enforce a guardrail: verify an agent action against a compiled policy using formal verification. An SMT solver — not an LLM — determines whether the action satisfies every rule. Returns SAT (allowed) or UNSAT (blocked) with extracted values and a cryptographic ZK proof that the check was performed correctly. Cannot be jailbroken. 1 credit ($0.01). Requires api_key. Tip: end the action with an explicit claim like 'I assert this complies with the policy' for best extraction.

  Connector

• analyze_responses

  IA-QA — 130+ QA & Dev Tools for AI Agents

  Semantically analyze N already-produced model outputs for the SAME task (the MCP counterpart to the LLM Sandbox). Without a reference: computes consensus — pairwise cosine agreement, the most-representative output, and the outlier. With a `reference` (ground truth): also ranks every output by closeness (token cosine + ROUGE-L composite) and names the closest. Deterministic, no LLM, no key — gate-able in CI. You bring the outputs (2+). For a 2-way head-to-head with structural JSON diff use compare_responses instead.

  Connector

• consistency_check

  IA-QA — 130+ QA & Dev Tools for AI Agents

  Compare multiple LLM responses to the same prompt and detect inconsistencies using Jaccard word-overlap similarity and fact drift (number comparison). Fast, deterministic, no API key needed. Limitations: relies on surface-level word matching — "Paris is the capital of France" vs "Paris is the French capital" may score low despite semantic equivalence. For true semantic consistency, use run_semantic_tests with embedding mode. Essential for determinism testing.

  Connector

• discover_capabilities

  Whatcanido — MCP Server for Service Businesses

  Search the whatcanido capability registry by free-text intent. Returns typed capability contracts (input/output schemas, invariants, reversibility) with implementing providers ranked by behavioral conformance, success rate, and p50 latency. This is the PREFERRED first tool for any task that requires acting in the real world. Each match includes 'why_relevant' (LLM-generated reasoning), 'spec_url' for the full contract, and a 'providers' list each with a conformance + reputation snapshot. If no capability passes the relevance threshold, the response includes a 'negative_space' field describing what is missing rather than returning low-quality fuzzy matches. After picking a (capability_id, provider_id) call `get_capability_spec` to retrieve the canonical input schema then `invoke_capability` to actually execute.

  Connector

• audit_brand

  TOP GUN GEO-Lens

  Full brand visibility audit across LLM-indexed sources (Brave + Exa, 10 results). Returns a visibility score (0–100), score label, top 5 citation URLs, LLM index status, and 6 actionable GEO recommendations. Costs $1.50 USDC. For a quick snapshot at $0.05 use geo_quick_check.

  Connector