"Tools for conducting deep research on a topic" matching MCP tools:

• zaira_get_docsA

  Zaira Labs GuideA

  Retrieve reference documentation for the Zaira Guide API and MCP server on demand. Topics: - getting_started — how to connect via MCP or REST, first queries - endpoints — full REST endpoint reference with parameters - mcp_tools — MCP tool reference with when-to-use guidance and a routing matrix - schema — the tool entry schema - errors — error taxonomy for REST (RFC 9457) and MCP (JSON-RPC) Call with no topic to get an index of available topics. Returns: the requested topic as a Markdown-KV block. With no topic, returns an index listing all available topics with short descriptions; call again with the relevant topic for the full content. Examples (topic selection): - "How do I call the REST API?" → {topic: "getting_started"} - "What parameters does /tools accept?" → {topic: "endpoints"} - "What fields are in a tool entry?" → {topic: "schema"} - "What error shapes do I handle, and what are the recovery steps?" → {topic: "errors"} - "Which MCP tool fits my task?" → {topic: "mcp_tools"} Edge cases: - No topic argument is valid — you get the index. This is the deferred-loading path; don't load every topic at once. - Topic must match the enum exactly (lowercase, underscore). "getting-started" with a hyphen is rejected as an unknown parameter. Risk: read-only, closed-world, idempotent — no state change possible.

  ConnectorNo auth

• searchA

  UseMyContext.aiA

  Search the user's files by filename and return matching documents in the deep-research result shape. ALIAS: this is the SAME search as search_files (same data, same permissions) - use it when your client requires the id/title/url search contract (ChatGPT deep research); otherwise prefer search_files for richer file metadata. Each result's id can be passed to fetch (or get_file) to read that document. Read-only; nothing is written, so it is safe to call.

  ConnectorNo auth

• searchA

  UneedA

  Use this when a deep research run needs to look up digital tools and products on uneed.best. Same catalog and same relevance ordering as search_products, returned as `{id, title, url}` documents; pass a result's id to `fetch` for the full profile. Prefer search_products when you want structured product fields directly.

  ConnectorNo auth

• searchA

  SMI Aware AssistantA

  Open-ended discovery across SMI deep reports, research bundles, and exports when you do not already have a record id — finds candidates by subject name, url, or keyword and returns typed references to pass to fetch. If you already have a record id from the conversation rather than from a search result, call the specific tool instead: smi_get_deep_report or smi_get_export to read one record, smi_check_order_complete for order readiness, smi_list_deep_reports or smi_list_exports for filtered listings, smi_get_report_findings for findings within a report. Deep reports and research bundles are filtered server-side by subject first/last name, broadening to an unfiltered fetch ranked client-side (across id, name, url, summary) when the filtered fetch finds nothing; exports match on url.

  ConnectorOAuth

• researchA

  SuprsonicA

  Multi-step deep research: search, scrape, enrich entities, and synthesize into a cited report. Returns a report (title, summary, sections, key findings, confidence) with numbered sources and the people and companies it found, enriched. Use for a question that needs many sources and a synthesized, cited answer. It takes far longer and costs more than search, which suits a quick fact. Cost: standard 10 credits, deep 20 credits, comprehensive 35 credits, charged only when a call succeeds. Options change it: include_analysis true +5, academic in source_types +2, enrich_entities false -3, synthesis false -5.

  ConnectorNo auth

• awareness_search_knowledgeA

  Awareness — Memory, Knowledge & Agent MarketsA

  Search the PUBLIC Awareness knowledge graph — 1,000+ sourced scientific papers. Use this when the user (especially a researcher or a research agent) asks for peer-reviewed findings: "latest evidence on X", "highly-cited papers about Y", "what does the literature say about Z". This is NOT a memory tool — it does not read the user's private memory, and it needs no per-user API key, so it works even when Awareness memory is not configured (the MCP connection itself still needs its own token). Coverage: condensed-matter, quantum-information, materials, machine-learning, renewable-energy, chemistry, biology, medicine, neuroscience, computer-science (2022-2026, cited >= 50), plus a business supply/demand domain. What comes back (anonymous preview mode): title, snippet (preview), confidence, source_ref (DOI), citation_count, domain/topic, and a detail page URL. Full content is NOT in the preview — tell the user it is paid retrieval via POST /api/v1/public/retrieve with an API key (see https://awareness.market/en/knowledge for the KaaS product). Args: query: Natural-language research question or keywords (2-1000 chars). domain: "science" (default) or "business". topic: Optional sub-topic slug, e.g. "medicine", "condensed-matter", "supply-chain". Empty = search all topics in the domain. top_k: Max results, 1-20 (default 5; anonymous callers are capped at 3). include_graph: When true, also return same-topic related items. Returns: {"results": [{id, title, snippet, confidence, source_ref, citation_count, domain, topic, url}], "related": [...], "total": int, "mode": str} `mode` is "preview" (anonymous) or "full" (authenticated).

  ConnectorNo auth

• searchA

  Evlek — Northern Cyprus Property MCP ServerA

  For research and citation lookups (deep research): free-text search of live Northern Cyprus (KKTC/TRNC) property listings on Evlek, in Turkish, English, Russian, German or Arabic. Returns matching listings as id/title/url, newest first (sale and rent as two groups when the query names neither). The answer language follows the language of the query. OpenAI deep-research compatible format, for research and citation clients. Use when: the caller only has a free-text query ("2+1 apartment in Kyrenia under 150000 pounds", "EVL-100464"). Not for: structured filters, paging or choosing the answer language.

  ConnectorNo auth

• searchA

  Melvea Local Honey DiscoveryA

  Search the Melvea local honey directory by free-text query and return matching producers as a list of results (id, title, url). Designed for ChatGPT Deep Research and Company Knowledge. Use for any local-honey discovery query that names or implies a place; the tool parses place and varietal from the query. Returns an honest empty list when nothing matches — never fabricate. Pair with fetch to retrieve full producer detail.

  ConnectorNo auth

• fetchA

  UseMyContext.aiA

  Fetch one document's full extracted text by id (a file id from search / search_files / list_files), in the deep-research result shape. ALIAS: this is the SAME read as get_file (same data, same permissions, same audit, same size guard - large files are truncated) - use it when your client requires the id/title/text/url fetch contract (ChatGPT deep research); otherwise prefer get_file, which also serves download links and inline images. Read-only; audited.

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_interpretationA

  corpusA

  Return the Wheel of Heaven interpretive framework's reading of a topic — explicitly the project's own Raëlian-canon-centred position, NOT mainstream consensus. Accepts a framework topic (overview, hypothesis, terminology, timeline, sources, method) for the curated narrative documents, or any other term to get the framework reading from the closest wiki entry. Use fact-layer tools (get_passage, compare_traditions) for source-grounded data without this framing.

  ConnectorNo auth

• searchA

  UNESCO UIS Education Statistics MCPA

  Searches the UNESCO UIS statistics (≈5,000 indicators: education — enrolment, completion, literacy, teachers, spending, SDG 4 —, science/R&D (SDG 9.5), culture (SDG 11.4) and demographic context) catalog and returns up to 10 matching documents as { id, title, url }, ordered by relevance (an empty list means nothing matched). This tool exists for the OpenAI Deep Research contract: ChatGPT deep research, company knowledge and research workflows over the Responses API require exactly the tools `search` and `fetch`. Pass one of the returned ids to `fetch` to read the document. For direct questions and for data (values, series, rankings) prefer the `uis_*` tools, which return the actual data with provenance — this is a catalog index, not a data query. Query: natural language or keywords, Portuguese or English; accents and case are ignored. Behavior: read-only and idempotent — the catalog comes from the public source and is cached in memory.

  ConnectorNo auth

• searchA

  Banco Central do Brasil (BCB) — SGS Time Series MCP ServerA

  Searches the Banco Central do Brasil time series (SGS: interest rates, inflation, exchange rates, credit, fiscal and external sector — the curated catalog plus the open data portal index) catalog and returns up to 10 matching documents as { id, title, url }, ordered by relevance (an empty list means nothing matched). This tool exists for the OpenAI Deep Research contract: ChatGPT deep research, company knowledge and research workflows over the Responses API require exactly the tools `search` and `fetch`. Pass one of the returned ids to `fetch` to read the document. For direct questions and for data (values, series, rankings) prefer the `bcb_*` tools, which return the actual data with provenance — this is a catalog index, not a data query. Query: natural language or keywords, Portuguese or English; accents and case are ignored. Behavior: read-only and idempotent — the catalog comes from the public source and is cached in memory.

  ConnectorNo auth

• searchA

  IBGE Brasil MCPA

  Searches the IBGE (Brazilian official statistics: SIDRA tables, municipalities, known indicators) catalog and returns up to 10 matching documents as { id, title, url }, ordered by relevance (an empty list means nothing matched). This tool exists for the OpenAI Deep Research contract: ChatGPT deep research, company knowledge and research workflows over the Responses API require exactly the tools `search` and `fetch`. Pass one of the returned ids to `fetch` to read the document. For direct questions and for data (values, series, rankings) prefer the `ibge_*` tools (`ibge_sidra`, `ibge_cidades`, `ibge_indicadores`, `ibge_comparar`…), which return the actual data with provenance — this is a catalog index, not a data query. Query: natural language or keywords, Portuguese or English; accents and case are ignored. Behavior: read-only and idempotent — the catalog comes from the public source and is cached in memory.

  ConnectorNo auth

• searchA

  Medical Terminologies MCPA

  Searches the medical terminologies (CID-10 categories and chapters, ICD-11, LOINC, RxNorm, MeSH, terminology version records) catalog and returns up to 10 matching documents as { id, title, url }, ordered by relevance (an empty list means nothing matched). This tool exists for the OpenAI Deep Research contract: ChatGPT deep research, company knowledge and research workflows over the Responses API require exactly the tools `search` and `fetch`. Pass one of the returned ids to `fetch` to read the document. For direct questions and for data (values, series, rankings) prefer the terminology tools (`icd11_*`, `cid10_*`, `loinc_*`, `rxnorm_*`, `mesh_*`, `atc_*`, `map_*`, `find_equivalent`, `validate_codes`), which return the actual data with provenance — this is a catalog index, not a data query. Query: natural language or keywords, Portuguese or English; accents and case are ignored. Behavior: read-only and idempotent — the catalog comes from the public source and is cached in memory.

  ConnectorNo auth

• research_networkA

  Seiche — world-markets evidence terminalA

  Discover which published datasets and sibling-product tools can answer a research question. Choose this for catalog discovery and handoff links, not for market observations: use world_markets_context for a market overview or market_workbench for supported FX and China histories. Explore the Palimpsest dataset catalog by topic, with source clocks, rights, freshness and pagination. Includes Seiche's separately completed funding context and explicit research steps into institution filings, exit liquidity and NarcoScope's granular global data. Source metadata and funding interpretations stay distinct. May fetch the published catalog; does not retrieve underlying dataset values or call the suggested sibling tools. No source collection, score changes, causal joins or trading authority.

  ConnectorNo auth

• ask_aduA

  A-du: ADU rentals, plans and rulesA

  Answer any question about Accessory Dwelling Units from A-du's published guides, city rules pages, pricing and marketplace pages, and its per-city statutory research, with citations to a-du.homes. Use for definitions ("what is a JADU"), process ("how long does plan check take"), landlord questions ("do I need to live on the property"), tenant questions ("what does A-du screening involve"), costs in general, and anything the specific tools (search_rentals, get_adu_rules, estimate_permit_fees, resolve_parcel, search_plans) do not cover. Prefer those tools when one fits; they return live data. Name the jurisdiction when the question is about a specific city so its research is included. The answer carries a confidence level and says when the corpus is silent. Example: {"question": "Can a city require parking for an ADU near transit?", "jurisdiction": "Long Beach"}.

  ConnectorNo auth

• deep_researchA

  Ai FeedsA

  ACCOUNT REQUIRED (free — sign in via GitHub at https://pipeworx.io/signup; depth:"thorough" needs a paid plan). If you are not signed in, use ask_pipeworx instead — it works on every tier. Grounded multi-source research across Pipeworx's 1863 STRUCTURED data sources (SEC filings, FRED/BLS economics, FDA, USPTO patents, markets, science, government records, etc.) in ONE call — this is NOT open-web search. Decomposes your question into focused facets, routes each to the right one of 7,176 tools IN PARALLEL, and returns a findings packet: verbatim evidence + confidence + source + fetched_at + a stable pipeworx:// citation per finding, with explicit gaps[] for facets the data couldn't answer (never invented). Best for broad/multi-part questions over structured data ("compare X and Y's regulatory + financial exposure", "research the filings + market picture for ACME"). For a single lookup use ask_pipeworx (one LLM call, not many). For BREAKING or colloquial CURRENT-NEWS / "what's the world saying about X" topics, prefer ask_pipeworx — it routes to live news APIs and the *-news-feeds packs; deep_research returns mostly empty gaps[] when the topic isn't in the structured catalog. Second-hop iteration: depth:"standard" re-angles unanswered gaps (gap recovery); depth:"thorough" additionally chases the best leads from the first pass — so multi-step questions resolve in one call. Every finding carries a `hop` field and a citation_uri — a resolvable pipeworx:// record URI, present only when the source emits one that resources/read can actually serve, so a citation you get back is always fetchable. "standard" and "thorough" also return contradictions[] flagging findings that disagree. Large records are semantically excerpted to the passages relevant to each facet (not head-truncated), so answers deep in a long filing/series aren't missed. Expect 15-60s (thorough with its follow-up + contradiction pass: up to ~90s).

  ConnectorNo auth

• deep_researchA

  Nbu UaA

  ACCOUNT REQUIRED (free — sign in via GitHub at https://pipeworx.io/signup; depth:"thorough" needs a paid plan). If you are not signed in, use ask_pipeworx instead — it works on every tier. Grounded multi-source research across Pipeworx's 1863 STRUCTURED data sources (SEC filings, FRED/BLS economics, FDA, USPTO patents, markets, science, government records, etc.) in ONE call — this is NOT open-web search. Decomposes your question into focused facets, routes each to the right one of 7,176 tools IN PARALLEL, and returns a findings packet: verbatim evidence + confidence + source + fetched_at + a stable pipeworx:// citation per finding, with explicit gaps[] for facets the data couldn't answer (never invented). Best for broad/multi-part questions over structured data ("compare X and Y's regulatory + financial exposure", "research the filings + market picture for ACME"). For a single lookup use ask_pipeworx (one LLM call, not many). For BREAKING or colloquial CURRENT-NEWS / "what's the world saying about X" topics, prefer ask_pipeworx — it routes to live news APIs and the *-news-feeds packs; deep_research returns mostly empty gaps[] when the topic isn't in the structured catalog. Second-hop iteration: depth:"standard" re-angles unanswered gaps (gap recovery); depth:"thorough" additionally chases the best leads from the first pass — so multi-step questions resolve in one call. Every finding carries a `hop` field and a citation_uri — a resolvable pipeworx:// record URI, present only when the source emits one that resources/read can actually serve, so a citation you get back is always fetchable. "standard" and "thorough" also return contradictions[] flagging findings that disagree. Large records are semantically excerpted to the passages relevant to each facet (not head-truncated), so answers deep in a long filing/series aren't missed. Expect 15-60s (thorough with its follow-up + contradiction pass: up to ~90s).

  ConnectorNo auth

• deep_researchA

  Georgia ArchivesA

  ACCOUNT REQUIRED (free — sign in via GitHub at https://pipeworx.io/signup; depth:"thorough" needs a paid plan). If you are not signed in, use ask_pipeworx instead — it works on every tier. Grounded multi-source research across Pipeworx's 1863 STRUCTURED data sources (SEC filings, FRED/BLS economics, FDA, USPTO patents, markets, science, government records, etc.) in ONE call — this is NOT open-web search. Decomposes your question into focused facets, routes each to the right one of 7,176 tools IN PARALLEL, and returns a findings packet: verbatim evidence + confidence + source + fetched_at + a stable pipeworx:// citation per finding, with explicit gaps[] for facets the data couldn't answer (never invented). Best for broad/multi-part questions over structured data ("compare X and Y's regulatory + financial exposure", "research the filings + market picture for ACME"). For a single lookup use ask_pipeworx (one LLM call, not many). For BREAKING or colloquial CURRENT-NEWS / "what's the world saying about X" topics, prefer ask_pipeworx — it routes to live news APIs and the *-news-feeds packs; deep_research returns mostly empty gaps[] when the topic isn't in the structured catalog. Second-hop iteration: depth:"standard" re-angles unanswered gaps (gap recovery); depth:"thorough" additionally chases the best leads from the first pass — so multi-step questions resolve in one call. Every finding carries a `hop` field and a citation_uri — a resolvable pipeworx:// record URI, present only when the source emits one that resources/read can actually serve, so a citation you get back is always fetchable. "standard" and "thorough" also return contradictions[] flagging findings that disagree. Large records are semantically excerpted to the passages relevant to each facet (not head-truncated), so answers deep in a long filing/series aren't missed. Expect 15-60s (thorough with its follow-up + contradiction pass: up to ~90s).

  ConnectorNo auth

• deep_researchA

  Data BostonA

  ACCOUNT REQUIRED (free — sign in via GitHub at https://pipeworx.io/signup; depth:"thorough" needs a paid plan). If you are not signed in, use ask_pipeworx instead — it works on every tier. Grounded multi-source research across Pipeworx's 1863 STRUCTURED data sources (SEC filings, FRED/BLS economics, FDA, USPTO patents, markets, science, government records, etc.) in ONE call — this is NOT open-web search. Decomposes your question into focused facets, routes each to the right one of 7,176 tools IN PARALLEL, and returns a findings packet: verbatim evidence + confidence + source + fetched_at + a stable pipeworx:// citation per finding, with explicit gaps[] for facets the data couldn't answer (never invented). Best for broad/multi-part questions over structured data ("compare X and Y's regulatory + financial exposure", "research the filings + market picture for ACME"). For a single lookup use ask_pipeworx (one LLM call, not many). For BREAKING or colloquial CURRENT-NEWS / "what's the world saying about X" topics, prefer ask_pipeworx — it routes to live news APIs and the *-news-feeds packs; deep_research returns mostly empty gaps[] when the topic isn't in the structured catalog. Second-hop iteration: depth:"standard" re-angles unanswered gaps (gap recovery); depth:"thorough" additionally chases the best leads from the first pass — so multi-step questions resolve in one call. Every finding carries a `hop` field and a citation_uri — a resolvable pipeworx:// record URI, present only when the source emits one that resources/read can actually serve, so a citation you get back is always fetchable. "standard" and "thorough" also return contradictions[] flagging findings that disagree. Large records are semantically excerpted to the passages relevant to each facet (not head-truncated), so answers deep in a long filing/series aren't missed. Expect 15-60s (thorough with its follow-up + contradiction pass: up to ~90s).

  ConnectorNo auth

• deep_researchA

  Nplg CatalogA

  ACCOUNT REQUIRED (free — sign in via GitHub at https://pipeworx.io/signup; depth:"thorough" needs a paid plan). If you are not signed in, use ask_pipeworx instead — it works on every tier. Grounded multi-source research across Pipeworx's 1863 STRUCTURED data sources (SEC filings, FRED/BLS economics, FDA, USPTO patents, markets, science, government records, etc.) in ONE call — this is NOT open-web search. Decomposes your question into focused facets, routes each to the right one of 7,176 tools IN PARALLEL, and returns a findings packet: verbatim evidence + confidence + source + fetched_at + a stable pipeworx:// citation per finding, with explicit gaps[] for facets the data couldn't answer (never invented). Best for broad/multi-part questions over structured data ("compare X and Y's regulatory + financial exposure", "research the filings + market picture for ACME"). For a single lookup use ask_pipeworx (one LLM call, not many). For BREAKING or colloquial CURRENT-NEWS / "what's the world saying about X" topics, prefer ask_pipeworx — it routes to live news APIs and the *-news-feeds packs; deep_research returns mostly empty gaps[] when the topic isn't in the structured catalog. Second-hop iteration: depth:"standard" re-angles unanswered gaps (gap recovery); depth:"thorough" additionally chases the best leads from the first pass — so multi-step questions resolve in one call. Every finding carries a `hop` field and a citation_uri — a resolvable pipeworx:// record URI, present only when the source emits one that resources/read can actually serve, so a citation you get back is always fetchable. "standard" and "thorough" also return contradictions[] flagging findings that disagree. Large records are semantically excerpted to the passages relevant to each facet (not head-truncated), so answers deep in a long filing/series aren't missed. Expect 15-60s (thorough with its follow-up + contradiction pass: up to ~90s).

  ConnectorNo auth