"Tokyo Metro" matching MCP tools:

• analyze_siteA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Use when a user has ONE specific lat/lon (a parcel, a candidate site) and wants the full multi-factor data-center suitability read in one call. Example: "Score this Phoenix parcel for a 100MW build — power, gas, fiber, market & risk." — analyze_site lat=33.45 lon=-112.07 capacity_mw=100 state=AZ. Params: lat (-90 to 90, required unless candidate_id or location), lon (-180 to 180, required unless candidate_id or location), location (a market NAME or metro slug instead of coordinates, e.g. location="ashburn" — resolved to that market's PUBLISHED CENTROID through the DCPI market row, with a resolved_from block naming what it resolved to; a MARKET-level read, NOT the parcel you named, and a trailing state is not stripped so "Ashburn, VA" will not resolve), candidate_id (a cand_… from get_refined_queue — resolves coordinates from the frozen mint and ignores lat/lon), capacity_mw (target load in MW, e.g. 50-500 — returns a `capacity_context` block sizing that load against nearby installed generation; it deliberately does NOT move overall_score, and the block names where the load IS applied), state (2-letter US, optional — improves the tax-incentive/context lookup), include_grid/include_risk/include_fiber (booleans, default true). Returns (full, paid): {overall_score (aka composite_score, 0-100 composite — for the integrity-first version that never imputes a missing factor, use get_composite_site_score), interpretation (verdict string, e.g. "Excellent site"), scores{power_infrastructure, gas_pipeline_access, fiber_connectivity, market_conditions, risk_resilience — each 0-100}, nearby{substations_50km, power_plants_80km, gas_pipelines_50km, facilities_100km, fiber_carriers_in_state, generation_capacity_mw, total_capacity_mw}, power_cost{industrial_cents_kwh, commercial_cents_kwh, period, basis}, fiber{connectivity_score, nearest_carrier_km, near_net_bucket, top_carriers[], single_carrier_risk}, location, citation}. FREE tier returns a REAL, citable HEADLINE — composite_score + verdict + the single top limiting factor (the lowest sub-score) + citation; the full per-factor breakdown, nearby infrastructure, power cost, fiber carriers, and the branded Site Analysis PDF (generate_site_analysis) are Pro. For dedicated water / disaster / climate / tax reads use get_water_risk / get_disaster_risk / get_climate_intel / get_tax_incentives. Do NOT use to compare 2+ sites (use compare_sites) or to find sites that match a target (use find_alternatives).

  ConnectorNo auth

• market_sessionsA

  FXMacroDataA

  Tell the user which FX trading sessions are currently open (Sydney, Tokyo, London, New York) and when the next session opens/closes. Use this when the user asks 'is the market open?', 'when does London open?', or 'which sessions overlap right now?'. Pass an ISO-8601 UTC timestamp via `at` to get the snapshot for a specific moment instead of now. Accounts for weekends and major banking holidays.

  ConnectorNo auth

• check_regionA

  commutescoutA

  Full current-conditions report for a California region. Use this for area-scale questions ("how is the Bay Area?", "what's happening in SoCal?") instead of stitching together point queries. It sweeps every source over the whole region at once: CHP incidents (severity-sorted, worst first), lane closures in place (full closures called out), chain controls, and wildfires inside the region. Regions: Bay Area, Sacramento metro, Tahoe/Sierra, Central Valley, Southern California, San Diego, Central Coast, North State. An unrecognized region name returns the list. Large regions are capped to the most severe items; the counts are always exact and the response says when a list was truncated. Freshness: CHP ~1/min fetched live, everything else 5-minute cache.

  ConnectorNo auth

• station_searchA

  Gachi Data API — Japan Station & Accessibility DataA

  Discover Japanese train stations by describing what you want around them, in English or Japanese — "朝ラーメンが食べられて車椅子トイレがある駅", "terminal station with late-night ramen", "水害リスクが低くてラーメンが多い駅". Semantic search over 9,035 station profiles (lines/terminal size, ramen density & styles, in-station accessible-toilet equipment, official hazard categories, ridership) with hybrid metadata filters — the filters guarantee the constraint, the embedding ranks by fit. Filter intent in the query text (朝ラー/深夜/おむつ/車椅子/水害リスク低…) is auto-applied (filter_source: inferred); explicit params win. Water-hazard intent (水害/洪水/浸水/高潮…リスク低) expands to flood rank AND storm-surge zone; 液状化/地盤 intent filters on the official liquefaction-tendency category; results carry risk_notes when other official hazard categories are high. Inferred facility filters with partial data coverage (おむつ/車椅子 — Tokyo-only data) BOOST confirmed stations instead of excluding unknowns (see soft_filters); explicit params remain strict. Taste/quality words (うまい, "good food", delicious…) are not evaluated (no review data); ramen ranking reflects shop density and style variety only. name_contains gives exact substring matching on station names (日本語/romaji) when the name itself is the requirement. Coverage notes: toilet stats = Tokyo stations only; ridership = Greater Tokyo operators only; hazard = official MLIT categories relayed as-is, NOT a safety judgment. Role split: station_search finds candidate stations — then get_toilet_by_station / search_ramen / get_station_hazard / get_station_context for detail on one station.

  ConnectorNo auth

• station_searchA

  Japan Toilet & AccessibilityA

  Discover Japanese train stations by describing what you want around them, in English or Japanese — "朝ラーメンが食べられて車椅子トイレがある駅", "terminal station with late-night ramen", "水害リスクが低くてラーメンが多い駅". Semantic search over 9,035 station profiles (lines/terminal size, ramen density & styles, in-station accessible-toilet equipment, official hazard categories, ridership) with hybrid metadata filters — the filters guarantee the constraint, the embedding ranks by fit. Filter intent in the query text (朝ラー/深夜/おむつ/車椅子/水害リスク低…) is auto-applied (filter_source: inferred); explicit params win. Water-hazard intent (水害/洪水/浸水/高潮…リスク低) expands to flood rank AND storm-surge zone; 液状化/地盤 intent filters on the official liquefaction-tendency category; results carry risk_notes when other official hazard categories are high. Inferred facility filters with partial data coverage (おむつ/車椅子 — Tokyo-only data) BOOST confirmed stations instead of excluding unknowns (see soft_filters); explicit params remain strict. Taste/quality words (うまい, "good food", delicious…) are not evaluated (no review data); ramen ranking reflects shop density and style variety only. name_contains gives exact substring matching on station names (日本語/romaji) when the name itself is the requirement. Coverage notes: toilet stats = Tokyo stations only; ridership = Greater Tokyo operators only; hazard = official MLIT categories relayed as-is, NOT a safety judgment. Role split: station_search finds candidate stations — then get_toilet_by_station / search_ramen / get_station_hazard / get_station_context for detail on one station.

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_state_denial_statsA

  frc-mcpA

  ANSWERS: "what is the FHA denial rate in <state>", "is it harder to get an FHA loan in <state>", "how does <state> compare with the national rate". PARAM: two-letter USPS code only (OH, TX); full names are rejected. Returns the state 2025 rate and counts against the national 22.1 percent. NOT FOR: metro or city questions (use get_metro_lender_gap) or lender-level questions. Historical observation computed from the public CFPB HMDA 2025 record (actions 1,2,3; loan_type 2). Not a prediction about any individual application. Attribution: FinanceRateCalc, CC BY 4.0.

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_map_snapshotA

  Smarter WeatherA

  Render a weather map image for visual analysis. Simple form: pass `product` (a viz-catalog product_id like "mrms_qpe_01h_pass2_conus", "goes_truecolor_conus", "spc_day1_categorical", "hrrr_precip_hybrid_derived_conus" (future radar), "hrrr_subhourly_conus" (15-min Future Radar), "mrms_radar_nowcast_conus", "rtma_conus", "nbm_daily_temps", or "nexrad_l3:{SITE}:{PRODUCT}" for single-site radar, e.g. "nexrad_l3:TLX:N0B") plus a location and zoom (5=regional, 8=metro, 10=city). Composed form: pass `scene` -- a declarative scene document layering basemap + multiple weather products + active alerts + storm features + inline GeoJSON in one image (layers draw bottom-to-top, under basemap labels). Example scene: {"scene":"1.0","view":{"center":{"lat":43.8,"lon":-91.2},"zoom":8},"layers":[{"type":"weather","product":"goes_truecolor_conus"},{"type":"weather","product":"nexrad_l3:ARX:N0B"},{"type":"alerts","filter":{"events":["Tornado Warning"]},"onError":"skip"}]}. Alert filters (all optional, AND-combined): `ids` (specific alerts), `events`, `severities`, `minSeverity` (Extreme>Severe>Moderate>Minor>Unknown). Single-site radar keys: the address is `nexrad_l3:{SITE}:{KEY}` where KEY is `N{tilt}{measurement}` and tilt 0 is the 0.5 degree sweep -- N0B reflectivity (dBZ, where and how heavy), N0G base velocity (knots toward/away from the radar), N0S storm-relative velocity (storm motion removed, so a couplet is rotation rather than translation -- prefer it for rotation questions), N0C correlation coefficient (0-1, debris and hail), N0X differential reflectivity (dB). Legacy codes (N0V, N0R, N0Q) are accepted as aliases. Not every site produces every key; when a render reports which keys a site has, retry with one of those. Optional `time` (unix seconds): closest frame. Forecast (HRRR/nowcast/NBM) honors future times; analysis (MRMS/NEXRAD/RTMA/GOES) clamps to latest past. Pass `time` for future-radar asks — do not claim that capability is missing. Product ids must be real viz-catalog entries -- shorthand like "radar" or "reflectivity" is not one. Omit `product` for the default hybrid precip still. For Alaska and Hawaii prefer a local site or `mrms_precip_hybrid_derived_alaska` over CONUS mosaics, which do not cover them. Returns the rendered image plus per-layer resolved valid times.

  ConnectorNo auth

• analyze_siteA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Use when a user has ONE specific lat/lon (a parcel, a candidate site) and wants the full multi-factor data-center suitability read in one call. Example: "Score this Phoenix parcel for a 100MW build — power, gas, fiber, market & risk." — analyze_site lat=33.45 lon=-112.07 capacity_mw=100 state=AZ. Params: lat (-90 to 90, required unless candidate_id or location), lon (-180 to 180, required unless candidate_id or location), location (a market NAME or metro slug instead of coordinates, e.g. location="ashburn" — resolved to that market's PUBLISHED CENTROID through the DCPI market row, with a resolved_from block naming what it resolved to; a MARKET-level read, NOT the parcel you named, and a trailing state is not stripped so "Ashburn, VA" will not resolve), candidate_id (a cand_… from get_refined_queue — resolves coordinates from the frozen mint and ignores lat/lon), capacity_mw (target load in MW, e.g. 50-500 — returns a `capacity_context` block sizing that load against nearby installed generation; it deliberately does NOT move overall_score, and the block names where the load IS applied), state (2-letter US, optional — improves the tax-incentive/context lookup), include_grid/include_risk/include_fiber (booleans, default true). Returns (full, paid): {overall_score (aka composite_score, 0-100 composite — for the integrity-first version that never imputes a missing factor, use get_composite_site_score), interpretation (verdict string, e.g. "Excellent site"), scores{power_infrastructure, gas_pipeline_access, fiber_connectivity, market_conditions, risk_resilience — each 0-100}, nearby{substations_50km, power_plants_80km, gas_pipelines_50km, facilities_100km, fiber_carriers_in_state, generation_capacity_mw, total_capacity_mw}, power_cost{industrial_cents_kwh, commercial_cents_kwh, period, basis}, fiber{connectivity_score, nearest_carrier_km, near_net_bucket, top_carriers[], single_carrier_risk}, location, citation}. FREE tier returns a REAL, citable HEADLINE — composite_score + verdict + the single top limiting factor (the lowest sub-score) + citation; the full per-factor breakdown, nearby infrastructure, power cost, fiber carriers, and the branded Site Analysis PDF (generate_site_analysis) are Pro. For dedicated water / disaster / climate / tax reads use get_water_risk / get_disaster_risk / get_climate_intel / get_tax_incentives. Do NOT use to compare 2+ sites (use compare_sites) or to find sites that match a target (use find_alternatives).

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_subsea_cablesA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Subsea (submarine) cable landings near a coordinate, or the global cable catalogue. The physical internet crossing an ocean lands at a finite number of points, and distance to one is a real siting factor for anything latency- or transit-sensitive. Pass lat+lon (+radius_km) for LANDING POINTS near a site — each with name, coordinates and distance_km. Omit coordinates for the CATALOGUE of tracked cables (712 tracked; each with cable_id, name, owners, length_km, rfs_year, is_planned — sparse fields are null, not guessed). ★ READ field_coverage AND connectivity_note BEFORE DRAWING A CONCLUSION: cable_count per landing point is NOT populated — the ingest writes the column but the upstream TeleGeography feed does not supply what it derives from, so every row carries the default 0. That is why connectivity_grade comes back null rather than graded: proximity to a landing point does NOT establish how many cables are reachable from it, and DC Hub will not infer a grade it cannot source. A filter over cable_count returns nothing for the same reason. Treat 0 as UNKNOWN, never as "no cables". Answers "which subsea cables land near this Virginia site" and "how far is the nearest cable landing from my campus". Try: get_subsea_cables lat=36.85 lon=-75.98 radius_km=200 — or get_subsea_cables (no args) for the catalogue. Do NOT use for terrestrial fiber routes (get_fiber_intel), a parcel fiber verdict (get_fiber_readiness), metro fiber depth (get_metro_fiber), or internet-exchange / peering density (get_peering_intel).

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_peering_intelA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Internet-exchange (IX/IXP) and peering density for a site, from PeeringDB. Pass lat+lon for the PEERING PROFILE around that point: facilities_nearby, a 0-100 score with its level, total_ix_presence, total_networks, and top_facilities each with ix_count and net_count — e.g. Ashburn comes back with 61 IX presences and 903 networks across the nearby sites, led by Equinix DC1-DC15 at 516 networks. Omit coordinates for the IXP directory (name, name_long, city, country, net_count, fac_count, media, protocols, policy/tech contacts). This is the layer that answers "can I actually reach networks cheaply from here", which fiber route geometry does not: a site can sit on dense fiber and still be far from any exchange. The score is a DERIVED convenience over PeeringDB counts, not a DC Hub-sourced grade — cite the underlying counts (facilities, IX presence, networks) rather than the score when it is load-bearing. Records are PeeringDB's, refreshed on read. Answers "how good is peering at this Ashburn site" and "which internet exchanges serve the Dallas market". Try: get_peering_intel lat=39.04 lon=-77.48 — or get_peering_intel (no args) for the IXP directory. Do NOT use for fiber route geometry (get_fiber_intel), near-net carrier distance at a parcel (get_fiber_readiness), metro fiber depth (get_metro_fiber), or subsea landings (get_subsea_cables).

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_subsea_cablesA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Subsea (submarine) cable landings near a coordinate, or the global cable catalogue. The physical internet crossing an ocean lands at a finite number of points, and distance to one is a real siting factor for anything latency- or transit-sensitive. Pass lat+lon (+radius_km) for LANDING POINTS near a site — each with name, coordinates and distance_km. Omit coordinates for the CATALOGUE of tracked cables (712 tracked; each with cable_id, name, owners, length_km, rfs_year, is_planned — sparse fields are null, not guessed). ★ READ field_coverage AND connectivity_note BEFORE DRAWING A CONCLUSION: cable_count per landing point is NOT populated — the ingest writes the column but the upstream TeleGeography feed does not supply what it derives from, so every row carries the default 0. That is why connectivity_grade comes back null rather than graded: proximity to a landing point does NOT establish how many cables are reachable from it, and DC Hub will not infer a grade it cannot source. A filter over cable_count returns nothing for the same reason. Treat 0 as UNKNOWN, never as "no cables". Answers "which subsea cables land near this Virginia site" and "how far is the nearest cable landing from my campus". Try: get_subsea_cables lat=36.85 lon=-75.98 radius_km=200 — or get_subsea_cables (no args) for the catalogue. Do NOT use for terrestrial fiber routes (get_fiber_intel), a parcel fiber verdict (get_fiber_readiness), metro fiber depth (get_metro_fiber), or internet-exchange / peering density (get_peering_intel).

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_peering_intelA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Internet-exchange (IX/IXP) and peering density for a site, from PeeringDB. Pass lat+lon for the PEERING PROFILE around that point: facilities_nearby, a 0-100 score with its level, total_ix_presence, total_networks, and top_facilities each with ix_count and net_count — e.g. Ashburn comes back with 61 IX presences and 903 networks across the nearby sites, led by Equinix DC1-DC15 at 516 networks. Omit coordinates for the IXP directory (name, name_long, city, country, net_count, fac_count, media, protocols, policy/tech contacts). This is the layer that answers "can I actually reach networks cheaply from here", which fiber route geometry does not: a site can sit on dense fiber and still be far from any exchange. The score is a DERIVED convenience over PeeringDB counts, not a DC Hub-sourced grade — cite the underlying counts (facilities, IX presence, networks) rather than the score when it is load-bearing. Records are PeeringDB's, refreshed on read. Answers "how good is peering at this Ashburn site" and "which internet exchanges serve the Dallas market". Try: get_peering_intel lat=39.04 lon=-77.48 — or get_peering_intel (no args) for the IXP directory. Do NOT use for fiber route geometry (get_fiber_intel), near-net carrier distance at a parcel (get_fiber_readiness), metro fiber depth (get_metro_fiber), or subsea landings (get_subsea_cables).

  ConnectorNo auth

• vivid_delivery_estimateA

  vivid-ads-commerceA

  Estimate WHEN an order would arrive at an Australian postcode — the question behind 'can I get it by Friday?'. Works the timeline through honestly: production starts only after the customer approves their digital proof (3pm AEST cutoff), then production time for that product, then transit for their postcode (metro/regional/remote bands). Returns an arrival WINDOW plus the assumptions it made. This is an ESTIMATE, never a guarantee — always relay the caveat, and for a hard deadline tell them to call 1300 721 614. Free pickup from Derrimut VIC is usually the fastest option.

  ConnectorNo auth

• predict_market_trajectoryA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Forecast a DCPI market's near-term trajectory (next 1-8 quarters). Projects excess_power_score and constraint_score forward with confidence bands that WIDEN with horizon, from DC Hub's daily DCPI snapshot history — the only source that can, because it owns the time-series. Use to answer "is this market trending toward BUILD or AVOID?" or "will Dallas power stay tight over the next 6 months?". Params: market_slug (required, metro slug e.g. dallas, phoenix, northern-virginia — valid slugs come from rank_markets / get_market_dcpi_rank); horizon_quarters (optional 1-8, default 4; 2 = ~6 months out). Returns {market_slug, method, basis{history_points, history_span_days, slope_per_day, trend}, horizon_quarters, projection[{quarter_out, excess_power_score, excess_power_band, constraint_score, constraint_band}], caveat, snapshot_record}. HONEST: linear trend extrapolation, NOT a guarantee — bands widen with horizon and short history; needs >=3 daily snapshots or it declines. Do NOT use for a single point-in-time verdict (use get_market_dcpi_rank) or to rank many markets (use rank_markets).

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_grid_intelligenceA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Use when a user asks "can I get N MW of power in <ISO> and how long will it take?" — the flagship grid-headroom + interconnection-queue brief for one ISO. Example: "How much excess power does PJM have right now and what is the time-to-power for a 200MW load?" — get_grid_intelligence region_id="PJM". Params: region_id (aliases iso/region accepted) — one of the 7 US ISOs ("PJM" | "ERCOT" | "CAISO" | "MISO" | "SPP" | "NYISO" | "ISO-NE") OR a US EIA balancing authority (40+ now live, e.g. Atlanta/SOCO, Carolinas/DUK, Florida/FPL, Phoenix/AZPS, Las Vegas/NEVP, Portland/PGE, Seattle/SCL, LA/LDWP, Quincy/GCPD, Denver/PSCO, Tennessee/TVA — note: balancing authorities return live generation mix; demand, headroom, interconnection-queue and DCPI scores remain ISO-level for the 7 ISOs). You may instead pass market="Ashburn" (or a metro slug like "northern-virginia") to name a MARKET rather than a grid code: it is resolved to the ISO for that market through the published DCPI market row, and the reply carries a resolved_from block naming what it resolved to — the figures then describe the ISO, which is larger than the market you named. Returns: {iso, iso_name, demand_mw, generation_mix_pct{NG,COL,NUC,WND,SUN,WAT,…}, renewable_share_pct, gas_share_pct, constraint_score (0-100 DCPI), excess_power_score (0-100 DCPI), avg_time_to_power_months, avg_queue_wait_months, curtailment_pct, reserve_margin_pct, retail_price_cents_kwh, queue_depth_gw, data_center_share_pct, stranded_capacity_mw, grid_emergencies_30d, build_rate_pct, last_updated}. ★avg_time_to_power_months and avg_queue_wait_months are DIFFERENT measurements and are not interchangeable: time-to-power is the DCPI per-market estimate averaged over the ISO, while queue-wait is a proxy derived from live interconnection-queue DEPTH (12 + 0.6 months per GW, clipped 12-66) and is the one that saturates on the deepest queues. Quote whichever you mean by name. Do NOT use to compare 2+ ISOs side-by-side (use compare_isos) or for the global greenest-first ranking (use get_grid_scoreboard).

  ConnectorNo auth

• macro_jobsA

  US Economic, SEC EDGAR & On-Chain Data (x402)A

  Latest U.S. labour-market data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, with the headline changes computed. Returns the unemployment rate, labour force participation rate, total nonfarm payrolls, the month-over-month change in payrolls (the "jobs added" number that leads the Employment Situation report), average hourly earnings, and year-over-year wage growth. All series are seasonally adjusted. BLS publishes levels; the month-over-month and year-over-year changes are computed here. When to use: reading the state of the labour market, wage-inflation context, or Fed-policy reasoning. When NOT to use: you need state or metro level detail, industry breakdowns, or JOLTS openings and quits. Args: none. Returns structuredContent: { "asOf": "2026-07", "periodName": "July 2026", "unemploymentRate": 4.1, "participationRate": 62.4, "nonfarmPayrolls": 158858, "payrollsChange": 73, "avgHourlyEarnings": 37.62, "earningsYoyPercent": 3.8, "source": "https://www.bls.gov/ces/" } Payrolls are in thousands of jobs, so payrollsChange 73 means +73,000 jobs on the month.

  ConnectorNo auth

• predict_market_trajectoryA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Forecast a DCPI market's near-term trajectory (next 1-8 quarters). Projects excess_power_score and constraint_score forward with confidence bands that WIDEN with horizon, from DC Hub's daily DCPI snapshot history — the only source that can, because it owns the time-series. Use to answer "is this market trending toward BUILD or AVOID?" or "will Dallas power stay tight over the next 6 months?". Params: market_slug (required, metro slug e.g. dallas, phoenix, northern-virginia — valid slugs come from rank_markets / get_market_dcpi_rank); horizon_quarters (optional 1-8, default 4; 2 = ~6 months out). Returns {market_slug, method, basis{history_points, history_span_days, slope_per_day, trend}, horizon_quarters, projection[{quarter_out, excess_power_score, excess_power_band, constraint_score, constraint_band}], caveat, snapshot_record}. HONEST: linear trend extrapolation, NOT a guarantee — bands widen with horizon and short history; needs >=3 daily snapshots or it declines. Do NOT use for a single point-in-time verdict (use get_market_dcpi_rank) or to rank many markets (use rank_markets).

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_grid_intelligenceA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Use when a user asks "can I get N MW of power in <ISO> and how long will it take?" — the flagship grid-headroom + interconnection-queue brief for one ISO. Example: "How much excess power does PJM have right now and what is the time-to-power for a 200MW load?" — get_grid_intelligence region_id="PJM". Params: region_id (aliases iso/region accepted) — one of the 7 US ISOs ("PJM" | "ERCOT" | "CAISO" | "MISO" | "SPP" | "NYISO" | "ISO-NE") OR a US EIA balancing authority (40+ now live, e.g. Atlanta/SOCO, Carolinas/DUK, Florida/FPL, Phoenix/AZPS, Las Vegas/NEVP, Portland/PGE, Seattle/SCL, LA/LDWP, Quincy/GCPD, Denver/PSCO, Tennessee/TVA — note: balancing authorities return live generation mix; demand, headroom, interconnection-queue and DCPI scores remain ISO-level for the 7 ISOs). You may instead pass market="Ashburn" (or a metro slug like "northern-virginia") to name a MARKET rather than a grid code: it is resolved to the ISO for that market through the published DCPI market row, and the reply carries a resolved_from block naming what it resolved to — the figures then describe the ISO, which is larger than the market you named. Returns: {iso, iso_name, demand_mw, generation_mix_pct{NG,COL,NUC,WND,SUN,WAT,…}, renewable_share_pct, gas_share_pct, constraint_score (0-100 DCPI), excess_power_score (0-100 DCPI), avg_time_to_power_months, avg_queue_wait_months, curtailment_pct, reserve_margin_pct, retail_price_cents_kwh, queue_depth_gw, data_center_share_pct, stranded_capacity_mw, grid_emergencies_30d, build_rate_pct, last_updated}. ★avg_time_to_power_months and avg_queue_wait_months are DIFFERENT measurements and are not interchangeable: time-to-power is the DCPI per-market estimate averaged over the ISO, while queue-wait is a proxy derived from live interconnection-queue DEPTH (12 + 0.6 months per GW, clipped 12-66) and is the one that saturates on the deepest queues. Quote whichever you mean by name. Do NOT use to compare 2+ ISOs side-by-side (use compare_isos) or for the global greenest-first ranking (use get_grid_scoreboard).

  ConnectorNo auth

• generate_site_analysisA

  DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, FiberA

  Use when a user wants a SHAREABLE, branded multi-page Site Analysis PDF for ONE lat/lon (a powered-land parcel, a candidate campus) — the polished client deliverable, not just a score. Example: "Make the Site Analysis PDF for this Carrier Mills parcel, 150 MW, for TON Infrastructure." — generate_site_analysis lat=37.694 lon=-88.65 capacity_mw=150 prepared_for="TON Infrastructure" prepared_by="Martone Advisors". Params: lat (-90 to 90, required), lon (-180 to 180, required), capacity_mw (target load MW, e.g. 50-500), prepared_for (client name on the cover), prepared_by (your firm — brands the report; defaults to DC Hub), latency_target (optional metro override; default = nearest real carrier hotel). Returns: {survey:{verdict, power/transmission, gas, water, air-permitting, fiber carriers, latency-to-nearest-carrier-hotel, market, tax}, pdf_report_url}. pdf_report_url is a ready-to-open link to download the branded 5-page PDF — no login needed, valid ~7 days; hand it to your human. For just the numeric suitability score (no PDF), use analyze_site instead.

  ConnectorNo auth

• scrutica_get_scenarioA

  ScruticaA

  Fetch geopolitical compute risk scenarios. Available: 'taiwan-strait' (4 TSMC disruption scenarios), 'iran-threat' (IRGC missile range vs Gulf compute), 'tokyo-earthquake' (Japan memory-fab exposure), 'south-china-sea' (submarine cable severing), 'abqaiq-2' (Saudi grid). Returns the scenario's summary plus its substrate serialized from the interactive page's own data modules — assumption scenarios / threat systems / affected assets with per-item sources and authority tiers, capped lists shipping their true totals. The propagation SIMULATION itself remains interactive-only at the returned URL.

  ConnectorNo auth

• get_city_summaryA

  cityparity — Cost-of-Living & Quality-of-Life ComparisonA

  Concise profile of one city: currency, tax shape (bracket count + top rate + payroll/national insurance), headline costs (rent / groceries / transit / childcare), safety-net values (parental leave, vacation, universal healthcare), and data freshness. Lighter than compare_cities; use when the user is asking about one place rather than a comparison. On parental leave, quote safety_net.parental_leave_summary rather than building your own sentence: some countries (Ireland, Australia, the UK, Czechia, part of Sweden) pay a flat weekly cash sum instead of a share of salary, so parental_leave_paid_pct is 0 or partial for them and stating it alone would wrongly call their leave unpaid. safety_net.avg_commute_minutes is a ONE-WAY commute, a single leg rather than a daily round trip: report it as "about N minutes each way", and double it yourself if the user asked what they spend commuting per day. It is door to door, averaged over every commuter regardless of mode, for the metro area, and excludes people who work from home. Read-only, no side effects; returns a text summary plus structured JSON.

  ConnectorNo auth