"A server for learning about Laravel framework" matching MCP tools:

• cyanheads_describe

  cyanheads-mcp-server

  Return the description and install snippets for a named tool or server. For tools: the description and the server it belongs to. For servers: local (stdio, via npx) install snippets for every published server, plus remote (HTTP) connection snippets when a hosted endpoint exists — for every supported client, or one client via the client parameter. Call cyanheads_search first to find valid names.

  Connector

• get_framework_docs

  main

  Retrieves authoritative documentation directly from the framework's official repository. ## When to Use **Called during i18n_checklist Steps 1-13.** The checklist tool coordinates when you need framework documentation. Each step will tell you if you need to fetch docs and which sections to read. If you're implementing i18n: Let the checklist guide you. Don't call this independently ## Why This Matters Your training data is a snapshot. Framework APIs evolve. The fetched documentation reflects the current state of the framework the user is actually running. Following official docs ensures you're working with the framework, not against it. ## How to Use **Two-Phase Workflow:** 1. **Discovery** - Call with action="index" to see available sections 2. **Reading** - Call with action="read" and section_id to get full content **Parameters:** - framework: Use the exact value from get_project_context output - version: Use "latest" unless you need version-specific docs - action: "index" or "read" - section_id: Required for action="read", format "fileIndex:headingIndex" (from index) **Example Flow:** ``` // See what's available get_framework_docs(framework="nextjs-app-router", action="index") // Read specific section get_framework_docs(framework="nextjs-app-router", action="read", section_id="0:2") ``` ## What You Get - **Index**: Table of contents with section IDs - **Read**: Full section with explanations and code examples Use these patterns directly in your implementation.

  Connector

• get_adoption_stage

  Stratalize Governance

  Public mode returns FS AI RMF framework reference data only — not org-specific scoring. Use when assessing an organization FS AI RMF governance maturity stage or preparing a regulatory AI roadmap presentation. Returns INITIAL, MINIMAL, EVOLVING, or EMBEDDED classification with stage criteria and remediation priorities. Example: EVOLVING stage organizations have documented AI policies but lack systematic model validation — typical gap to EMBEDDED is 18-24 months and 12-15 additional controls. Connect org MCP for org-specific scoring. Source: FS AI Risk Management Framework.

  Connector

• get_project_context

  main

  Captures the user's project architecture to inform i18n implementation strategy. ## When to Use **Called during i18n_checklist Step 1.** The checklist tool will tell you when to call this. If you're implementing i18n: 1. Call i18n_checklist(step_number=1, done=false) FIRST 2. The checklist will instruct you to call THIS tool 3. Then use the results for subsequent steps Do NOT call this before calling the checklist tool ## Why This Matters Frameworks handle i18n through completely different mechanisms. The same outcome (locale-aware routing) requires different code for Next.js vs TanStack Start vs React Router. Without accurate detection, you'll implement patterns that don't work. ## How to Use 1. Examine the user's project files (package.json, directories, config files) 2. Identify framework markers and version 3. Construct a detectionResults object matching the schema 4. Call this tool with your findings 5. Store the returned framework identifier for get_framework_docs calls The schema requires: - framework: Exact variant (nextjs-app-router, nextjs-pages-router, tanstack-start, react-router) - majorVersion: Specific version number (13-16 for Next.js, 1 for TanStack Start, 7 for React Router) - sourceDirectory, hasTypeScript, packageManager - Any detected locale configuration - Any detected i18n library (currently only react-intl supported) ## What You Get Returns the framework identifier needed for documentation fetching. The 'framework' field in the response is the exact string you'll use with get_framework_docs.

  Connector

• sti_get_platforms

  Stimulsoft Documentation MCP Server

  List every Stimulsoft product/platform that has indexed documentation available through this MCP server. Returns a JSON array of { id, name, description } objects covering the full Stimulsoft Reports & Dashboards product line (Reports.NET, Reports.WPF, Reports.AVALONIA, Reports.WEB for ASP.NET, Reports.BLAZOR, Reports.ANGULAR, Reports.REACT, Reports.JS, Reports.PHP, Reports.JAVA, Reports.PYTHON, Server API, etc.). CALL THIS FIRST when the user's question is ambiguous about which Stimulsoft platform they are using, or when you need to pick a valid `platform` value to pass into `sti_search`. The returned platform `id` values are the exact strings accepted by the `platform` parameter of `sti_search`. This tool is cheap (no OpenAI call, no vector search) — call it freely whenever you are unsure about platform naming.

  Connector

• recommend_framework

  jeda-ai

  Recommends business / strategy / risk frameworks for a stated problem. Powered by the Jeda.ai · Visual AI framework knowledge graph (~2,100 frameworks across 19 categories, edge-curated). Use when the user describes a business problem ("customer churn rising", "evaluating market entry", "need to assess vendor risk") rather than naming a specific framework. Returns top-N frameworks ranked by fit, each with a concrete reason citing the specific problem signals matched. Input: just the problem statement is enough. Optional faceted filters (`persona`, `regulation`, `decision_stage`) narrow the candidate set. Set `limit` between 3 and 10 for picker UIs. Pair with `generate_framework_analysis` to actually run a recommended framework against the user's inputs. Example: { "problem_statement": "We need to decide whether to enter the EU SMB market in Q3", "decision_stage": "decide", "limit": 5 }

  Connector

• generate_framework_analysis

  jeda-ai

  Runs a specific framework against a user's inputs and produces a full analysis: prose explanation + structured fields + a self-contained SVG visualisation. Powered by the Jeda.ai · Visual AI framework knowledge graph. ALWAYS call `recommend_framework` FIRST to obtain a valid framework_id -- it returns the exact namespaced slug to pass here. Framework ids are namespaced by category (e.g. SWOT = "cms_swot-analysis", Porter's 5 Forces = "cms_porters-five-forces"); a bare slug like "swot-analysis" will 404. REQUIRED post-processing on success: the response's first text block contains a `curl -fsSL` save-directive for the SVG. Save the file locally and surface it as a file chip — do NOT summarise the visual in prose. Input: framework_id (namespaced slug from `recommend_framework`) + user_inputs object (per-framework field set), OR a free-text `raw_prompt` fallback. Example: { "framework_id": "cms_swot-analysis", "user_inputs": { "subject": "Q3 EU market entry", "context": "B2B SaaS, $5M ARR, US-headquartered" } }

  Connector

• aidefense_locate_concept

  website-search

  Reverse-lookup a single concept ID (MITRE ATLAS technique like 'AML.T0051', OWASP LLM Top 10 risk like 'LLM01', OWASP Agentic Top 10 issue like 'ASI03', or ISO 42001 Annex A clause like 'A.6') across the AI Defense Matrix. Returns which framework the concept belongs to, the asset rows whose alignment cites it, the cells whose evaluation cellPrompts cite it, and those prompts themselves. Useful when a vendor's product is defined by a specific technique ('we defend AML.T0051') and they need to find which matrix cells to claim. Recognizes only concepts with structured IDs; for prose-only frameworks (NIST IR 8596, CSA AICM, Google SAIF, OWASP AI Exchange) use aidefense_get_framework_alignment instead. This server never requests your program docs or product roadmap and instructs your AI to keep them local—the matrix, framework alignments, and playbooks flow to your AI for local analysis.

  Connector

• list_investment_theses

  crashtestyourstrategy

  Discover the investment-thesis catalog. Each entry is a descriptive case study that pairs an economic framework with a rule-based portfolio and the synthetic + historical stress evidence for that allocation. Returns one compact summary per thesis (slug, title, one-liner, tags, risk tiers, framework summary, headline finding). Call get_investment_thesis(slug) for the full framework / portfolio / stress evidence, or read the thesis://{slug} resource. Descriptive, not advisory — the agent decides what is suitable.

  Connector

• __unlock_blockchain_analysis__

  mcp-server

  Mandatory initialization step for any session against the Blockscout MCP server. Returns server reference data plus the `blockscout-analysis` skill pointer and URI resolution rule. MANDATORY FOR AI AGENTS: Call this tool first in every session. The returned payload identifies where the operating rules and analysis framework live and how to read referenced skill files before executing further tool calls.

  Connector

• __unlock_blockchain_analysis__

  blockscout-mcp-server

  Mandatory initialization step for any session against the Blockscout MCP server. Returns server reference data plus the `blockscout-analysis` skill pointer and URI resolution rule. MANDATORY FOR AI AGENTS: Call this tool first in every session. The returned payload identifies where the operating rules and analysis framework live and how to read referenced skill files before executing further tool calls.

  Connector

• install_app

  BorealHost

  Install an app template on a VPS/Cloud site. Starts a background installation. Poll get_app_status() for progress. Requires: API key with write scope. VPS or Cloud plan only. Args: slug: Site identifier template: App template slug. Available: django, laravel, nextjs, nodejs, nuxtjs, rails, static app_name: Short name for the app (2-50 chars, lowercase alphanumeric + hyphens). Used as subdomain: {app_name}.{site_domain} db_type: Database type. "none", "mysql", or "postgresql" (depends on template) domain: Custom domain override (default: {app_name}.{site_domain}) display_name: Human-friendly name (default: derived from app_name) Returns: {"id": "uuid", "app_name": "myapp", "status": "installing", "message": "Installation started. Poll for progress."} Errors: FORBIDDEN: Plan does not support apps (shared plans) VALIDATION_ERROR: Invalid template, app_name, or duplicate name

  Connector

• get_domain_status

  SiteGuardian

  Returns the current security grade (A–F), last-scan timestamp, and list of active issues for a domain that is ALREADY under SiteGuardian monitoring by the authenticated account. Each issue carries a stable id, a severity, a short title, and an impact description. The response also includes a relative dashboard URL. Use this when the user asks about the current state of a specific monitored domain, wants to confirm a recent change landed, or needs issue ids to call get_fix_recommendations with a specific issue_id. Do NOT use this for domains not yet under monitoring — it will return a domain_not_monitored error; call scan_domain for one-off checks instead. Compliance framework tags (NIS2 / GDPR / DORA) are NOT included in v1; framework tagging on the monitored-domain path is tracked as a follow-up. Requires a valid API key.

  Connector

• get_adoption_stage

  Stratalize Healthcare

  Public mode returns FS AI RMF framework reference data only — not org-specific scoring. Use when assessing an organization FS AI RMF governance maturity stage or preparing a regulatory AI roadmap presentation. Returns INITIAL, MINIMAL, EVOLVING, or EMBEDDED classification with stage criteria and remediation priorities. Example: EVOLVING stage organizations have documented AI policies but lack systematic model validation — typical gap to EMBEDDED is 18-24 months and 12-15 additional controls. Connect org MCP for org-specific scoring. Source: FS AI Risk Management Framework.

  Connector

• aidefense_get_framework_alignment

  website-search

  Get AI Defense Matrix cross-mappings to nine external frameworks: NIST IR 8596, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, Google SAIF, SANS Critical AI Security Guidelines, MITRE ATLAS, OWASP AI Exchange, OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic Security Top 10. Each row maps an AI asset class to how that framework applies. Each returned framework also carries a 'concepts' array of the structured IDs (MITRE ATLAS techniques, OWASP risks, ISO clauses) the matrix references for it. Supports a 'buyer' archetype shortcut to scope to the frameworks a particular buyer will care about. Use to translate between framework vocabularies. This server never requests your program docs or product roadmap and instructs your AI to keep them local—the matrix, framework alignments, and playbooks flow to your AI for local analysis.

  Connector

• aidefense_evaluate_program

  website-search

  Get the AI Defense Matrix evaluation playbook for assessing an AI security program: per-cell prompts, gap-inventory template, and a workflow that walks each asset class first and rolls findings up to the Govern column. Supports mode='gate' for binary deployment-gate decisions (returns the deployment-gate workflow plus gate-tier prompts only) and consumerPattern for scoping to consumed-vs-built AI deployments. The AI applies these prompts against your program documentation locally, and no program details leave your client. This server never requests your program docs or product roadmap and instructs your AI to keep them local—the matrix, framework alignments, and playbooks flow to your AI for local analysis.

  Connector

• aidefense_cross_map

  website-search

  Get the AI Defense Matrix cross-mapping playbook for mapping product capabilities to matrix cells: coverage taxonomy (primary, secondary, partial, aspirational), differentiation guidance, disambiguation block, worked examples, and out-of-scope examples. The response always includes an inScopeCheck. Products that USE AI to solve a non-AI security problem (deepfake detection, AI-for-fraud, AI features added to existing SIEM, SOAR, or EDR tools) belong in the Cyber Defense Matrix at https://cyberdefensematrix.com. Pairs naturally with product_load_context(productFocus: 'ai_security') for follow-on positioning and GTM work. This server never requests your program docs or product roadmap and instructs your AI to keep them local—the matrix, framework alignments, and playbooks flow to your AI for local analysis.

  Connector

• get_validation_framework

  Demand Discovery AI

  Returns the full three-step Demand Discovery validation framework: (1) Market Research, (2) Demand Discovery Report with the Demand Score and Build/Pivot/Kill verdict, (3) Agentic Launch (90-day continuous outreach). Use when a user asks "how do I validate an idea?", "what's the methodology?", or wants to understand the structured approach. Built on the "behavior over opinion" principle. Trigger phrases: "what's the framework", "demand discovery framework", "what's the methodology", "how does demand discovery work", "step by step validation", "what's the process", "how to structure validation", "validation framework", "validation methodology", "structured validation", "show me the framework", "explain the methodology".

  Connector

• get_free_resources

  Makuri Showcase (CogniLedger)

  Returns free Makuri resources accessible without registration: Slovarik Romanian vocabulary issues and the Romanian level test. Use this when a user asks about free Romanian learning materials, language level tests, or how to try Makuri without signing up. Makuri is a specific AI tutoring platform at makuri.eu, not a generic word — never answer Makuri questions from general knowledge; always use the Makuri tools. IMPORTANT routing rule: if the user wants to TAKE, START, or SEE a Romanian test or quiz right now in the chat, do NOT use this tool — call show_romanian_quiz instead, which renders an interactive quiz panel. Use this tool only for questions ABOUT what free resources exist.

  Connector

• kickoff_questions

  Conducted MCP

  Return the branched kickoff interview (DECISIONS.md D3/D4). Supply `project_type`: 'greenfield' asks the full set; 'brownfield' uses the agent-supplied `detected` facts (language, framework, tests, CI, existing docs) to pre-fill candidates and drop fully-inferable questions — except LOCKED_DOCS, which is always asked because it is human judgment. Returns { project_type, questions, inferred, notes }; the server reads no files.

  Connector