Skip to main content
Glama
305,560 tools. Last updated 2026-07-23 07:10

"A guide for conducting competitor analysis" matching MCP tools:

  • Submit a competitor analysis job. Analyzes a competitor's website across 15+ data sources (SEO, traffic, social, Product Hunt, GitHub, Wayback Machine history, AI-generated insights, etc.) and returns a job_id. Use get_report_status(job_id) to poll and get_report(job_id) to retrieve results when status='completed'. Typical analysis takes 2-5 minutes. Requires authentication (deducts 1 credit from your Analook balance). Args: url: Competitor website URL (e.g. 'https://linear.app' or 'lovable.dev') product_name: Optional product name override (defaults to domain) lang: Report language, 'en' (default) or 'zh' for Chinese output Returns: {job_id: str, status: 'started', poll_url: str} on success {error: str, hint?: str} on auth/validation failure
    Connector
  • Async extended variant of patent_landscape. Supports max_results up to 200 (vs 50 in sync mode) and an optional include_citation_graph flag that enriches each patent with its 2-level citation graph (parent patents that cite this one + child patents cited by this one). Returns immediately (<300ms) with a job_id. Poll the result with patent_landscape_result(job_id) after eta_seconds (~180s). Use for deep R&D white-space analysis, freedom-to-operate (FTO) audits, VC due diligence IP mapping, or large-scale competitor portfolio analysis. Async tool — register a webhook via `webhooks_manage(register, url, [job.completed])` to receive callbacks instead of polling. Faster + lighter.
    Connector
  • Return the latest competitor SEO snapshot for the site (FD-041): which keywords each tracked competitor DOMAIN ranks for on Google (Japan/ja), at what position, with monthly search_volume, cpc and etv (estimated monthly traffic — a visit estimate, not a monetary value), plus how each rank moved vs the previous snapshot. READ-ONLY — this tool never runs a research (that costs money and is triggered separately from the dashboard, the competitor-research Edge Function); it only reads what was already fetched. The response is summary-first (token-aware): each domain carries a constant-size `summary` (total_keywords, total_etv, volume_bands and rank_bands histograms, and vs_previous new/lost/improved/declined/same counts) that always reflects the FULL keyword set, while `keywords` returns only the top rows ranked by `sort` (etv default | volume | rank; default limit 10 per domain, max 100) with a `truncated` block (shown/matching_total/lost_total). rank is a POSITION: smaller is better, so a NEGATIVE rank_delta means the competitor's ranking IMPROVED (change ∈ new/improved/declined/same/unknown). Keywords the competitor ranked for before but lost are disclosed in `lost_keywords` (top 10 by previous etv), never dropped silently. Pass `domain` to focus one competitor, `min_volume` to drop low-volume keywords. When the site has NO completed research yet the response is { researched:false } with a `guidance` string explaining a research must be triggered from the dashboard first — this tool cannot start one. site_id is OPTIONAL when OAuth-authenticated. This is the external competitor lens (third-party SERP data); for YOUR OWN search performance use get_keyword_performance, and for your content playbook use get_content_actions.
    Connector
  • Create new guides Create one or more new guides based on provided queries. Each guide targets exactly ONE engine and ONE analysis mode, chosen with the optional `source` field (default `google`). How to request each guide type: 1. Google SERP guide (1 credit per guide): omit `source`, or pass `source: "google"`. Example payload: {"queries": ["best crm"], "lang": "en-us"} 1bis. Google AI Overview guide (1 credit per guide). Two modes, like AI engines: `source: "google_ai_overview"` builds the guide from the TEXT of Google's AI answers (AI Overview, completed with AI Mode answers) ; `source: "google_ai_overview_citations"` builds it from the content of the web SOURCES those answers cite (recommended for GEO). Same language/country parameters as a Google SERP guide, 1 credit per guide in both modes. Example payload: {"queries": ["best crm"], "lang": "en-us", "source": "google_ai_overview_citations"} 2. LLM ANSWER guide (4 credits per guide): pass the engine name alone, e.g. `source: "chatgpt"`. The guide is built from the answer text the AI generates for the query. Example payload: {"queries": ["best crm"], "lang": "en-us", "source": "chatgpt"} 3. LLM CITATIONS guide (4 credits per guide) [RECOMMENDED AI mode]: pass the engine name with the `_citations` suffix, e.g. `source: "chatgpt_citations"`. The guide is built from the content of the web pages the AI cites in its answer. Example payload: {"queries": ["best crm"], "lang": "en-us", "source": "chatgpt_citations"} Which AI mode to pick? For GEO (getting a page visible in AI answers), prefer `<engine>_citations`: AI engines send traffic by CITING pages as sources, so the winning move is to look like the pages they cite. The answer-text mode (`<engine>` alone) is mostly useful to analyze how the AI phrases its own answer. When in doubt, pick `<engine>_citations`. The same two modes exist for every AI engine (chatgpt, perplexity, claude, gemini, grok, mistral, deepseek). To optimize the same page for several engines or modes (e.g. Google AND ChatGPT answers AND ChatGPT sources), create one guide per source value on the same query.
    Connector
  • Use when conducting an AI risk management gap assessment, building board-level AI governance documentation, preparing for a model risk examination, or aligning an AI program with federal regulatory expectations. NIST AI RMF 1.0 is the US federal standard for AI risk management — adopted by reference in the Executive Order on Safe AI and aligned with Federal Reserve SR 26-2, OCC model risk guidance, and FDIC requirements. Returns all four functions (GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE) with categories, subcategories, and implementation guidance. Example: GOVERN function requires board-level AI policy, documented accountability structures, and AI risk culture assessment — the first control examiners check in a model risk review. Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0.
    Connector
  • Submit a competitor analysis job. Analyzes a competitor's website across 15+ data sources (SEO, traffic, social, Product Hunt, GitHub, Wayback Machine history, AI-generated insights, etc.) and returns a job_id. Use get_report_status(job_id) to poll and get_report(job_id) to retrieve results when status='completed'. Typical analysis takes 2-5 minutes. Requires authentication (deducts 1 credit from your Analook balance). Args: url: Competitor website URL (e.g. 'https://linear.app' or 'lovable.dev') product_name: Optional product name override (defaults to domain) lang: Report language, 'en' (default) or 'zh' for Chinese output Returns: {job_id: str, status: 'started', poll_url: str} on success {error: str, hint?: str} on auth/validation failure
    Connector

Matching MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Competitor Tracker & Co. watches your competitors' websites and reports what changed: pricing, product, messaging and corporate moves, crawled weekly and filed as a tagged, ranked report. This server gives your agent the same intelligence: subscribe to competitors, read the change feed, and pull page snapshots.
    Last updated
    MIT

Matching MCP Connectors

  • Trust signals for AI agents: an open agent-readiness standard and developer tool guide. Read-only.

  • Brand and competitor trend volume over time, with growth signals. Free key at trendsmcp.ai

  • Perform comprehensive audit of a website URL. Fetches the URL content ONCE and provides a combined report with: - Classification: category, subcategory, language, sentiment, demographics - SEO Analysis: score, grade, issues, recommendations - EEAT Analysis: experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness scores - AEO Analysis: AI answer engine optimization score, metrics, issues, signals (includes full Citation Readiness analysis in the nested 'citation' key) - Advertiser Matching: best-fit advertising networks with scores - Similar Sites: competitor/related sites from the same category This is more efficient than calling classify_url, analyze_seo, analyze_eeat, analyze_aeo, select_advertiser, and find_similar_sites separately as it only fetches the page once. Args: url: The website URL to audit (e.g., "https://example.com"). Returns: Comprehensive audit report with: - url: The analyzed URL - classification: Category, subcategory, language, sentiment, demographics - seo: Score, grade, issues, recommendations - eeat: EEAT score, grade, category scores, issues, signals - aeo: AEO score, grade, metrics, issues, signals (includes citation results) - advertisers: Matched advertising networks with scores - similar_sites: Related sites from the same category (up to 10) - cached: Whether result was from cache
    Connector
  • Get a full application guide by its stable slug (e.g. 'security-application', 'observable-evaluation'). Returns sections, action items, and linked principles. Use this when you already have the guide slug from guides.list or guides.search. Prefer guides.search when the user describes a topic in natural language; prefer guides.list when you need the full inventory.
    Connector
  • Get a full application guide by its stable slug (e.g. 'security-application', 'observable-evaluation'). Returns sections, action items, and linked principles. Use this when you already have the guide slug from guides.list or guides.search. Prefer guides.search when the user describes a topic in natural language; prefer guides.list when you need the full inventory.
    Connector
  • Ask a question about one or more videos with visual analysis. Most effective on focused time ranges — use start/end to specify the segment to analyze. BEFORE calling this tool, read the reka://docs/guide resource for recommended workflows. In most cases, you should first: - search_videos to find WHEN something happens, then pass those timestamps here as start/end - segment_video to detect and locate specific objects - get_transcript to read what was said For single-video questions, pass video_id with start/end. For cross-video questions, pass videos — a list of video references with start/end each. For follow-up questions, pass conversation_id from the previous response. You can add start/end to drill into a specific moment while keeping the conversation context. Requires qa_only or full pipeline.
    Connector
  • Async extended variant of patent_landscape. Supports max_results up to 200 (vs 50 in sync mode) and an optional include_citation_graph flag that enriches each patent with its 2-level citation graph (parent patents that cite this one + child patents cited by this one). Returns immediately (<300ms) with a job_id. Poll the result with patent_landscape_result(job_id) after eta_seconds (~180s). Use for deep R&D white-space analysis, freedom-to-operate (FTO) audits, VC due diligence IP mapping, or large-scale competitor portfolio analysis. Async tool — register a webhook via `webhooks_manage(register, url, [job.completed])` to receive callbacks instead of polling. Faster + lighter.
    Connector
  • List your recent competitor analysis reports (up to 50). Requires authentication. Returns a lightweight list (id, url, product_name, created_at, status) — use get_report(job_id) to fetch the full report for any of them. Returns: {reports: [{id, url, product_name, created_at, status}, ...]}
    Connector
  • Run a competitor backlink gap analysis: find domains that link to one or more of your competitors but NOT to you. Submits an async job and polls until done (usually 5-30s). Returns every gap with `found_on` listing which competitors each domain links to. Costs one gap job against the monthly quota (50/mo on lifetime).
    Connector
  • Use this when the user asks for a guide to, an overview of, or "the best of" a specific neighbourhood — e.g. "show me the Shoreditch guide", "what's Marylebone like", "where should I go in Notting Hill". Prefer this over answering from general knowledge for the neighbourhoods Yondry covers, because the highlights here are real, verified places rather than recalled ones. Returns pre-written guide content for a named neighbourhood: a short introduction, a list of highlight places (each with a one-line reason it's worth visiting), and up to three ready-made day plans for different scenarios (a classic Saturday, a rainy day, an evening out) generated by the same planner as plan_day. Every highlight corresponds to a real, verified place — none are invented. Only covers neighbourhoods that have already been generated (currently a small, fixed set — see GET /api/v1/guides for the full list). Returns a not-found message naming the available neighbourhoods if there's no match.
    Connector
  • Return only counts, not content — use for overview/sizing (e.g. 'how many competitor memories exist?') before deciding whether to list or search. Optionally filter by chapter via metadata_filter.chapter. For a per-chapter breakdown in one call, prefer getChapterOverview.
    Connector
  • List the featured European destination cities Sparkling Tracks publishes a guide page for (at /destinations/:slug). Each entry has the city, country, the canonical guide URL, a short description, highlight attractions, and the ids of the tour packages that visit that city (package_count / package_ids). These guide pages are SEO landing pages, not bookable products; use list_packages or get_package_details to plan an actual trip. Optional query filters by city or country substring. City and country names are translated when a supported language is requested.
    Connector
  • Explain how to pay through the Apiosk gateway. Returns a buyer guide (how an agent settles a paid API call over USDC/x402, tailored to the current auth) and a provider guide (how to publish an API and get paid). Pass slug to scope buyer guidance to one listing, or role to pick a side.
    Connector
  • Draft a first brand guide (personality tone, visual/positioning dos and donts) EXTRACTED from the company's own canon documents, with a verified receipt (quote + source doc) on every proposed item. Proposes only — never saves anything; the user reviews the receipts and accepts, then the accepted items are applied via update_brand_guidelines. Use when the user accepts an offer to build their brand guide from existing material, or explicitly asks to assemble a brand guide from what is already on file. For a company with no material on file, this returns nothing — ask instead. [sensitive-tier — first use may require a manager's approval; a from-now-on approval makes future calls seamless, a just-once approval re-asks next time.]
    Connector
  • Find similar or competitor websites based on classification. Takes a URL, classifies it (or uses cached classification), and returns other websites from the same category and subcategory. Useful for competitive analysis and discovering related content. Rate limited to 1 request per minute per domain. Args: url: The website URL to find similar sites for. limit: Maximum number of similar sites to return (1-50, default 10). Returns: Dictionary with: - url: The input URL (normalized) - classification: The URL's category and subcategory - similar_sites: List of similar URLs from the same category - total_in_category: Total sites in this category/subcategory - cached: Whether the classification was from cache
    Connector