Skip to main content
Glama
113,480 servers. Updated

Matching MCP tools:

Matching MCP Connectors:

"Weights & Biases" matching MCP servers:

GET /v1/servers – MCP directory API reference
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables LLM agents to query Weights & Biases experiments, including listing projects, runs, metrics, plotting metrics, and retrieving run details.
    5
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server for chemistry: it computes molecular weights and isotope distributions from chemical formulae and resolves compound name/formula lookups, backed by NIST atomic-weight data and a cached finder over multiple online and offline sources.
    5
    14 PyPI
    1
    GPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for deep CNKI academic search, retrieving multi-dimensional data (abstracts, keywords, references, citations, similar papers, keyword weights) and enabling citation network traversal via Playwright-based API interception.
    16
    32 PyPI
    13
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Exposes tools an assistant can call to compute four-pillar and Zi Wei Dou Shu charts, annual and monthly scores, and two-person synastry comparisons. Also back-tests its own past predictions against a user's reported life events, returning hit rate, correlation, the years it got wrong, and refitted weights.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables users to record probabilistic judgments in an immutable ledger, automatically score them against outcomes, and analyze systematic biases across six classification layers. It supports natural-language interaction for logging predictions, checking randomness, and auditing data integrity while avoiding advice or replacing user judgment.
    Apache 2.0
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables auditing scientific papers for methodological biases such as selection bias and p-hacking, and assessing citation credibility and research consensus.
    8
    -