Quellgeist
Quellgeist
First-line incident triage you can trust: ranked root-cause hypotheses where every claim cites a real evidence handle — and the agent abstains rather than guess.
Quellgeist is a model-agnostic AI agent for first-line production-incident triage.
It runs a legible JSON-action ReAct loop over read-only tools (structured logs +
recent deploys + metric time-series), then emits a structured Diagnosis:
confidence-ranked root-cause hypotheses, each backed by a structured evidence
handle (LogRef.id / CommitRef.sha / MetricRef.id) the agent actually saw —
never free text. Two ideas set it apart:
Cite-by-structured-handle. Evidence is a checkable handle, not a sentence, so a fabricated citation is measurable and deterministically rejected by a keyless fabrication check — not a matter of fuzzy string-matching.
Abstain-over-hallucinate. A confidently-stated wrong cause is the worst possible answer, so "insufficient evidence" is a first-class outcome.
Status: Wave 4 complete — the fine-tune works. The DR-0020 QLoRA fine-tune of the local reasoner (Qwen3-4B, served via Ollama) took it from the base's 0/16 holdout to 12/16 — zero fabrication, zero speculative-filtering, and cheaper than the base — while beating a 31B frontier (Gemma-4-31B, 10/16) on the same holdout at $0, fully offline. Non-memorisation is triangulated three ways (fixtures ≈ holdout; core-fresh ≥ core-overlap; structure probe 7/10). Two honest limits: the
resource_exhaustionclass didn't transfer (0/N; the frontier passes it), and adversarial-abstention recall is 6/12 at the system level — a ceiling the 31B frontier shares (also 6/12), not a fine-tune regression. When this agent misses it's incomplete or too cautious, never confidently fabricating. See Status & roadmap · fine-tune case study.
Why it's different
Evidence is a handle | Each hypothesis cites a log row's source-stable |
Abstention is a feature | When signals are weak the agent returns |
Model-agnostic by construction | The loop parses JSON actions from plain chat text, so it's identical on Gemini's free tier and a local 4-bit Qwen — no dependence on any backend's native function-calling. Swap models with one config change. (DR-0008, DR-0010) |
Reliability is gated, not asserted | A keyless, deterministic CI gate (ruff + black + |
What it is / what it's NOT
It is: a first-line triage agent — ranked, evidence-cited root-cause hypotheses (or an honest abstention) from read-only logs/deploys/metrics, over a model-agnostic loop that runs on a hosted frontier model or a local 4B.
It is NOT: an autonomous remediator (it never mutates prod — resolution verification is a deferred, cut-first wave); a production-hardened service (the demo is a deliberate toy); or a general-purpose agent. The holdout it's measured on is out-of-vocabulary but in-structure — not a claim about unseen incident shapes or real production data.
Related MCP server: AIOps MCP
Quickstart (~30 seconds to a broken service + structured logs)
Requires uv and Python 3.12+.
See a real-shaped diagnosis in one keyless command (no model, no API key):
uv sync && uv run quellgeist diagnose --demo # renders the demo incident's cited postmortemThen run the full loop against the live toy service:
uv run uvicorn demo.app.main:app # 1. start the toy service (leave running)
# --- in a second shell, from the repo root ---
uv run python -m demo.chaos.bad_deploy # 2. inject a simulated bad deploy
curl -s localhost:8000/login # 3. trip /login -> 500s + structured error logs
uv run quellgeist diagnose --show-trace # 4. diagnose live (needs a model; see below)
uv run python -m demo.chaos.reset # back to a green slateThe live step needs a reasoner — see Running the model.
Without a key, quellgeist diagnose exits 1 with a one-line error + hint (never a
traceback); --demo always works keyless and renders the same output shape
deterministically from gold.
Architecture
A custom, legible loop is the orchestration layer; the three read-only tools are
the evidence interface; the Diagnosis schema is the contract that the
postmortem renderer and the eval judge both read.
flowchart TD
trigger(["incident trigger - CLI"]) --> loop
model["reasoner via LiteLLM<br/>(Gemini or local Qwen, swappable)"] -. "chat completion" .-> loop
subgraph loopbox["model-agnostic JSON-action ReAct loop"]
loop["run_loop()<br/>decide, call tool, observe, repeat"]
end
loop -- "query_logs" --> logs["logs tool<br/>structured JSONL, stable ids"]
loop -- "get_recent_commits" --> commits["commits tool<br/>deploy_log.json, shas"]
loop -- "query_metrics" --> metrics["metrics tool<br/>time-series, named series"]
logs -- "rows + ids" --> loop
commits -- "commits + shas" --> loop
metrics -- "series + names" --> loop
loop --> diag["Diagnosis (schema.py)<br/>ranked hypotheses citing<br/>LogRef.id / CommitRef.sha / MetricRef.id, or abstains"]
diag --> pm["postmortem renderer<br/>deterministic Markdown"]
diag --> judge["eval judge<br/>fixture scenarios, CI gate"]All three tools are also exposed as MCP servers over stdio
(python -m quellgeist.servers.logs_mcp, …commits_mcp, …metrics_mcp). The
agent currently reuses the same tool functions in-process behind a ToolSpec
registry; a stdio MCP-client path (the agent driving the servers over the
wire) is on the roadmap (DR-0010).
Deep dive:
docs/architecture.mdwalks the full pipeline (loop → tools → verifier → postmortem), a sequence diagram, the module map, and the cross-cutting design decisions.
The servers publish to the Official MCP Registry on each tagged release (see
docs/publishing.md); once published each is runnable with
uvx --from quellgeist quellgeist-logs-mcp (or …-commits-mcp / …-metrics-mcp).
Example session
Inject the bad deploy — it drops a marker that flips verify_token into a
NoneType regression and writes a deploy_log.json whose offending commit landed
just before the errors (illustrative stdout — the timestamp reflects when you
run it; paths shown relative to the repo root):
$ uv run python -m demo.chaos.bad_deploy
injected bad deploy a1b2c3d (touched demo/app/auth.py) at 2026-06-24T12:22:43Z
marker: demo/.bad_deploy
deploy log: demo/deploy_log.json
next: hit /login to generate the 500s, then `quellgeist diagnose`With a reasoner configured, quellgeist diagnose reads the logs + deploys and
emits a postmortem. The CI environment has no validated model key (DR-0012), so
the diagnosis below is rendered from gold — built deterministically from the
fixture's labelled cause and evidence handles via render_postmortem, not
live model output:
# Incident Postmortem (rendered from gold)
## Root-cause hypotheses
### 1. Bad deploy a1b2c3d (10:01:50Z) refactored auth.py and introduced a NoneType error in verify_token; /login 500s begin ~20s later at 10:02:12Z. (confidence: 1.00)
Evidence:
- log #2
- commit a1b2c3dReproduce that render yourself (no model needed):
uv run python - <<'PY'
from evals.scenarios.generator import load_scenario
from quellgeist.agent.schema import Diagnosis, Hypothesis
from quellgeist.output.postmortem import render_postmortem
s = load_scenario("evals/scenarios/fixtures/bad_deploy_0001.json")
gold = Diagnosis(hypotheses=[
Hypothesis(cause=s.gold_cause, confidence=1.0, evidence=s.gold_evidence_refs)
])
print(render_postmortem(gold, title="Incident Postmortem (rendered from gold)"))
PYThe point isn't the prose — it's that log #2 and commit a1b2c3d are
exact handles into the real signals, not paraphrases. A live run additionally
fills in a one-line summary and suggested actions, and abstains outright when the
evidence is too weak to name a confident cause.
Write the postmortem to a file with --out postmortem.md, or as a self-contained
HTML page with --out postmortem.html (or --format html) — same deterministic
render, no external assets.
Running the model
The reasoner is any LiteLLM model string, selected by
--model or the QG_MODEL env var (default gemini/gemini-3.5-flash). Provider
keys are read from the environment by LiteLLM; nothing is stored in the repo.
export QG_MODEL="gemini/gemini-3.5-flash"
export GEMINI_API_KEY="…"
uv run quellgeist diagnose --show-traceOr fully local and offline via Ollama — the intended home default (DR-0008; exact artifact pinned in DR-0019), no API key involved:
ollama pull qwen3:4b-instruct-2507-q4_K_M
export QG_MODEL="ollama_chat/qwen3:4b-instruct-2507-q4_K_M"
uv run quellgeist diagnose --show-traceBase vs tuned — important. The
ollama pullabove is the base Qwen3-4B: the honest safe floor — it scores 0/16 on the holdout and abstains on everything, never fabricating (DR-0019). The 12/16 headline is the DR-0020 fine-tune (quellgeist-qwen3-dr0020), which you build + serve viafinetune/README.md(a free-Colab QLoRA run →ollama create). Until that tuned GGUF is published for a one-line pull, the base model is what a plainollama pullgives you — safe, not yet useful. Use a hosted model (above) or the fine-tune to see live diagnoses.
Heads-up (DR-0012): a Gemini key on an unvalidated, no-billing project returns
429 limit: 0 on current models, so the shipped CI gate is deliberately
keyless and model-driven evals are key-gated and run out-of-band
(DR-0015). At home the intended default reasoner is a local Qwen3-4B via
Ollama (DR-0008).
Running the eval (reasoner + verifier + LLM-judge)
The fixture eval scores the reasoner with a deterministic keyword judge + a zero-fabrication check (the keyless gate), and can additionally run two model layers (DR-0016): a verifier that confirms cited evidence supports each hypothesis (forcing abstention otherwise) and an advisory LLM-judge rubric.
export GEMINI_API_KEY="…"
export QG_MODEL="gemini/gemini-3.5-flash"
QG_VERIFY=1 QG_JUDGE_LLM=1 \
QG_MIN_CALL_INTERVAL_S=6 \ # pace calls under the free-tier RPM (avoids 429 bursts)
uv run python -m evals.run_evalsQG_VERIFIER_MODEL / QG_JUDGE_MODEL override the model per layer (default
QG_MODEL). An unreachable backend (quota/503/timeout) or a rejected
credential (missing/invalid/stale key) is reported as a skip, not a failure
(DR-0015/DR-0017), so the out-of-band eval never reddens on a free-tier hiccup.
The LLM-judge's scores are advisory (they never gate). On a human-labelled
gold subset it agreed with human verdicts at Cohen's kappa 0.81 using an
independent judge (groq/llama-3.1-8b-instant ≠ the reasoner) — validated on that
subset (DR-0018); still self-grading whenever QG_JUDGE_MODEL equals the reasoner.
CI's out-of-band eval runs on Groq (
groq/llama-3.3-70b-versatile, gated onGROQ_API_KEY): Gemini's free tier proved unusable from cloud CI (429 → 503 → timeout → invalid-key), so the reasoner was swapped with one env var — the model-agnostic thesis in action (DR-0017). The intended home default remains a local Qwen3-4B (DR-0008).
Status & roadmap
Built in rolling waves — only the current wave is implemented in detail
(see docs/quellgeist-plan-rolling-wave.md).
The full decision history lives in the
ADR log.
Wave | Scope | Status |
0 | De-risk the model bet (4B can orchestrate the loop) | ✅ done — default = Qwen3-4B (DR-0008) |
1 | Bad-deploy slice: demo → break → diagnose → postmortem; eval harness + CI | ✅ done — spine built & unit-tested |
2 | Reliability core: verifier pass, deterministic fabrication check, abstention, LLM-as-judge | ✅ built — keyless deterministic gate + opt-in verifier/judge; first real run passed with zero fabrication (DR-0016/DR-0017). Judge validation + a reliability rate carry into Wave 3 |
3 | Breadth: config/env + resource-exhaustion classes, metrics, ~50 scenarios | ✅ done — 3 classes across a 65-scenario suite; first full run 61/65, 0 fabricated; judge validated (kappa 0.81). See the reliability + judge case studies |
4 | Cost / fine-tune: QLoRA Qwen3-4B vs base vs frontier, with/without verifier | ✅ done — base 0/16 → tuned 12/16 holdout (0 fabricated, 0 speculative-filter, cheaper than base); frontier-competitive vs Gemma-4-31B (beats it 10/16 on capability, ties 6/12 on abstention); |
5 | Polish & ship: HTML render, security pass, MCP registry, launch | 🚧 engineering complete — release-gated (HTML render + security scanners + threat model + registry/OIDC scaffolding done; the release tag + launch are the remaining steps) |
6 | Resolution-verification loop | ⏳ cut-first |
The wave boundary is deliberate, not unfinished: only the current wave is built in detail, and later waves are scoped but intentionally unimplemented.
Reliability gate
The deterministic CI gate is the reliability contract: 196 tests (ruff +
black via pre-commit, then pytest — covering the loop's never-crash /
graceful-abstention behaviour, the deterministic fabrication check and
cite-based judge gate, the verifier and advisory LLM-judge, parameterised
scenario generation, the judge-validation harness, the server filters, the
postmortem renderer, and the fixture-backed eval harness) on Python 3.12 and 3.13.
Out of band, the model-driven eval runs the reasoner over the 65-scenario suite. The latest full run scored 61/65 passed, 0 fabricated evidence (Cerebras Gemma-4-31B) — per-class breakdown + the failure analysis in the reliability case study.
uv run pytest tests/ -q
uv run pre-commit run --all-filesDevelopment & contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the dev setup, conventions, and the wave model; SECURITY.md for reporting and the no-secrets / toy-demo policy; and CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md for community expectations. Bug reports and feature requests use the issue templates; PRs follow the PR template.
License
MIT © Rajeev Shyam Kumar.
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Latest Blog Posts
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Rajeev-Shyam/Quellgeist'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server