EVIDIQ Sentinel MCP
Integrates with OKX.AI to provide security scanning for AI agents on the OKX platform, enabling them to verify MCP endpoints, manifests, and Agent Skills before interaction.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@EVIDIQ Sentinel MCPscan MCP endpoint https://example.com/mcp"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
An agent can discover an MCP server or Skill in seconds. Determining whether that service contains hidden instructions, dangerous capabilities, credential exposure, or conflicting behavior should happen before the agent connects to it.
EVIDIQ Sentinel is the security and compliance preflight layer for the agent
economy. It scans remote MCP endpoints, supplied MCP manifests, Agent Skills,
and multi-target bundles. Each scan produces a deterministic PASS, REVIEW, or
BLOCK verdict, a score from 0–100, actionable findings, and a signed report.
Sentinel can also request a semantic review from GLM 5.2 through 0G Compute TEE. That review is advisory: deterministic static rules alone determine the score and verdict. Signed reports can be anchored to 0G Storage on a best-effort basis.
What it does
MCP endpoint inspection — safely introspects a public remote MCP service and evaluates its exposed metadata.
Manifest analysis — scans supplied tools, prompts, resources, and capability declarations without executing them.
Agent Skill review — examines Skill markdown or an HTTPS source for unsafe instructions and capability mismatches.
Bundle analysis — evaluates several targets together for shadowing, conflicts, and cross-service risk.
Deterministic decisions — static rules, not model output, produce every score and verdict.
Verifiable reports — EIP-191 signatures protect report integrity and support offline verification.
Optional evidence anchoring — signed report evidence can be recorded on 0G Storage when configured.
Pay per scan — four scan tools cost
0.02 USDT0each; four discovery and verification tools are free.
Related MCP server: meok-mcp-injection-scan-mcp
Use it from any agent
# Read the public Skill document
curl -s https://mcp.evidiq.dev/sentinel/skill.md
# Inspect current x402 requirements
curl -s https://mcp.evidiq.dev/sentinel/x402
# Connect the remote MCP server (Claude Code)
claude mcp add --transport http evidiq-sentinel https://mcp.evidiq.dev/sentinel/mcpPublic endpoints:
Endpoint | Purpose |
| Remote MCP transport |
| Agent-readable usage and safety guide |
| x402 v2 pricing and payment discovery |
| Service health |
| Technical documentation |
MCP tools
Paid scans
Tool | Cost | Description |
|
| Safely introspect and scan a public remote MCP endpoint |
|
| Scan supplied MCP tool, prompt, resource, and capability metadata |
|
| Scan supplied Skill markdown or content retrieved from an HTTPS URL |
|
| Analyze multiple targets together for interactions, shadowing, and conflicts |
Free preflight and verification
Tool | Cost | Description |
| Free | Read service capabilities, supported targets, limits, and pricing |
| Free | Validate a target's format before starting a paid scan |
| Free | Return the exact price for a requested paid tool |
| Free | Verify a Sentinel report's EIP-191 signature and integrity |
How a scan works
Sentinel validates target type, URL scheme, payload size, and structural limits.
A paid tool must pass the configured x402 gate before scan execution.
The target is normalized, sanitized, and analyzed by deterministic security rules.
If enabled, GLM 5.2 reviews the sanitized material through 0G Compute TEE.
Advisory model observations are kept separate from deterministic scoring.
Static findings produce the final
0–100score andPASS,REVIEW, orBLOCKverdict.Sentinel signs the canonical report with EIP-191.
Sentinel attempts a best-effort 0G Storage anchor and returns the report.
Deterministic rules, advisory intelligence
Sentinel deliberately separates decision authority from model-assisted analysis. This prevents nondeterministic output from silently changing a security verdict.
The static rules cover risks including:
prompt injection and instruction override;
hidden instructions and tool poisoning;
tool shadowing and cross-service behavior modification;
credential, secret, and sensitive-data exposure;
exfiltration paths and unexpected network behavior;
dangerous file-system, process, or network capabilities;
obfuscation and encoded payloads;
declared-versus-observed capability mismatches;
insecure transport and unsafe remote references;
x402 metadata and payment-flow inconsistencies.
When semantic review is enabled, GLM 5.2 can add context and surface ambiguous patterns that deserve human attention. It cannot raise or lower the deterministic score and cannot replace the static verdict.
Report contract
Every completed scan returns a Sentinel report containing:
the normalized scan target and report metadata;
a deterministic score on the
0–100scale;one verdict:
PASS,REVIEW, orBLOCK;categorized findings with severity, evidence, and remediation;
an EIP-191 signature over the canonical report;
optional 0G Storage anchor metadata when upload succeeds;
an advisory semantic-analysis trace when enabled and available.
Use the free verify_scan_report tool to verify signature integrity. A valid
signature proves that the signed report has not been altered and identifies the
signing address. It does not guarantee that a target remains unchanged after the
scan or that every future interaction is safe.
The 0G Storage anchor is best effort. A missing anchor does not change the static verdict or invalidate an otherwise valid report signature.
Pricing and x402
Operation | Cost | Token | Network | Atomic amount |
Any of the four scan tools |
| USDT0 | X Layer ( |
|
Capability, validation, estimate, and verification tools | Free | — | — | — |
Sentinel publishes an x402 v2 challenge using the exact scheme. Compatible
clients read the PAYMENT-REQUIRED response, authorize the requested USDT0
amount, and retry with PAYMENT-SIGNATURE.
The live discovery response at
/sentinel/x402 is authoritative for the
active asset, recipient, amount, and network.
Official OKX Payment SDK
Payment verification and settlement run through the official OKX Onchain OS Payment SDK, not a hand-rolled payment stack:
Package | Role |
| |
|
The OKX facilitator verifies each authorization and settles it on X Layer; Sentinel keeps ownership of scan routing, pricing, and report signing. Each price is sent to the SDK as an explicit USD₮0 atomic asset amount rather than a USD string, so the quoted fee token always matches the token registered for the OKX listing.
Settlement completes before any paid scan begins. When the facilitator's own
confirmation wait elapses it answers timeout even though the transaction it
broadcast can still confirm moments later, so Sentinel resolves that state
through the facilitator's settlement-status lookup instead of failing the call.
Success is only ever reported when the facilitator confirms it.
Integration guide: OKX Onchain OS — integrate via SDK.
Architecture
flowchart TB
agent["<b>AI agent</b><br/>MCP client"]
request{"Scan request<br/>free or paid?"}
agent -->|POST /sentinel/mcp| request
free["Free preflight<br/>validate · estimate · verify"]
gate["x402 v2 gate<br/>paid scan authorization"]
xlayer[("X Layer<br/>USDT0 · eip155:196")]
request -->|free helper| free
request -->|paid scan| gate
gate -. payment rail .-> xlayer
subgraph sentinel["EVIDIQ Sentinel trust boundary"]
direction TB
normalize["1. Normalize & sanitize<br/>protocol · size · depth limits"]
rules["2. Deterministic rules engine<br/><b>only score + verdict authority</b>"]
report["3. Canonical SentinelReport<br/>findings · remediation · PASS / REVIEW / BLOCK"]
sign["4. EIP-191 signature<br/>integrity + signer identity"]
normalize --> rules --> report --> sign
end
free --> normalize
gate --> normalize
compute[("0G Compute TEE<br/>GLM 5.2 semantic review")]
storage[("0G Storage<br/>best-effort evidence anchor")]
normalize -. sanitized context .-> compute
compute -. advisory context only .-> report
sign -. best effort .-> storage
response["<b>MCP response</b><br/>signed report + optional anchor metadata"]
sign --> response
classDef client fill:#312e81,stroke:#a78bfa,color:#ffffff,stroke-width:2px;
classDef payment fill:#052e16,stroke:#4ade80,color:#ffffff,stroke-width:2px;
classDef sentinel fill:#241b35,stroke:#8b5cf6,color:#ffffff,stroke-width:2px;
classDef optional fill:#083344,stroke:#2dd4bf,color:#ecfeff,stroke-width:2px;
classDef output fill:#4c1d95,stroke:#c4b5fd,color:#ffffff,stroke-width:2px;
class agent,request client;
class free,gate,xlayer payment;
class normalize,rules,report,sign sentinel;
class compute,storage optional;
class response output;Reading the diagram: solid arrows are required scan-path steps. Dashed arrows
are optional or advisory integrations. Only the deterministic rules engine sets
the score and PASS / REVIEW / BLOCK verdict; GLM 5.2 adds context to the
report but cannot change that decision. An unavailable 0G Storage anchor also
does not block a signed report.
Security boundaries
Sentinel analyzes metadata and supplied content; it does not grant a scanned service trust or execute its advertised tools.
Remote targets and retrieved content remain untrusted input and are subject to protocol, size, and depth limits.
Secret-like values are detected and redacted from report evidence where applicable.
Semantic review receives sanitized scan material and remains advisory.
Deterministic output is canonicalized before signing for consistent integrity checks.
EIP-191 signatures protect report authenticity; they do not certify the target's future behavior.
0G Storage anchoring is optional and best effort, not a prerequisite for a verdict.
Re-scan a target after manifest, Skill, endpoint, ownership, or deployment changes.
Apply human review before granting credentials, funds, write access, or irreversible authority.
Verification status
Sentinel's GLM 5.2 production inference path through 0G Compute has returned
teeVerified: true, and real 0G Storage report anchoring has been exercised.
These checks verify the respective Compute and Storage paths. They do not turn
advisory model output into scoring authority.
Paid call settled on X Layer
A live paid scan against the deployed endpoint completed the full x402 v2 round trip through the official OKX facilitator:
Tool |
|
Amount |
|
Flow | unpaid call → HTTP 402 + |
Settlement tx |
|
Result | signed |
An earlier scan of a payment-gated MCP target settled in
0xf7cac7c6…e22905
and returned a tool error because that target answers 402 to Sentinel's fetch —
the payment path succeeded, the scan target was simply unreachable.
Free tools stay ungated and answer 200 without any payment header.
EVIDIQ Sentinel is registered as OKX.AI Agent #7584. Its public listing is currently under review: view the agent page.
Self-host
Requirements: Node.js 22+ and npm.
# From source
npm install
npm run build
npm startOr run the container:
docker build -t evidiq-sentinel .
docker run -d --name evidiq-sentinel -p 3000:3000 --env-file .env evidiq-sentinelLocal routes: POST /mcp · GET /skill.md · GET /x402 · GET /health
Configuration
Copy .env.example to .env and set only the integrations you use:
# Server
PORT=3000
HOSTNAME=0.0.0.0
# Official OKX Payment SDK — required for the production payment path.
# Create the credentials at https://web3.okx.com/onchainos/dev-portal
# All three must be set together; a partial set is rejected at startup.
OKX_API_KEY=...
OKX_SECRET_KEY=...
OKX_PASSPHRASE=...
OKX_BASE_URL=https://web3.okx.com
# OKX_SYNC_SETTLE=0 # opt out of the facilitator's synchronous confirmation wait
# x402 v2 — X Layer mainnet / USDT0
X402_PRICE=20000
X402_ASSET=0x779ded0c9e1022225f8e0630b35a9b54be713736
X402_CHAIN=eip155:196
X402_PAY_TO=0x...
X402_DOMAIN_NAME=USD₮0
X402_DOMAIN_VERSION=1
X402_RPC_URL=https://rpc.xlayer.tech
X402_SETTLE_KEY=0x... # only used when no OKX credentials are configured
# Report signing
SENTINEL_PRIVATE_KEY=0x...
# Optional GLM 5.2 semantic review through 0G Compute
AI_ENABLED=false
OG_COMPUTE_API_KEY=...
OG_COMPUTE_BASE_URL=https://router-api.0g.ai/v1
OG_COMPUTE_MODEL=glm-5.2
AI_MAX_TOKENS=900
AI_TEMPERATURE=0.1
AI_TIMEOUT_MS=22000
# Optional best-effort 0G Storage anchoring
OG_PRIVATE_KEY=0x...
OG_STORAGE_RPC=https://evmrpc.0g.ai
OG_STORAGE_INDEXER=https://indexer-storage-turbo.0g.aiWith AI_ENABLED=false, Sentinel runs deterministic static analysis only. If
x402 is not configured in a self-hosted deployment, the local discovery endpoint
reports that no payment gate is active.
Never commit .env files, signing keys, settlement keys, API keys, or scanned
private material.
Development
npm install # install dependencies
npm run build # compile TypeScript to dist/
npm test # run the test suite once
npm run dev # start the local watch serverLinks
Website — https://evidiq.dev
Sentinel documentation — https://evidiq.dev/docs/sentinel
Live MCP endpoint — https://mcp.evidiq.dev/sentinel/mcp
Agent Skill — https://mcp.evidiq.dev/sentinel/skill.md
x402 discovery — https://mcp.evidiq.dev/sentinel/x402
Service health — https://mcp.evidiq.dev/sentinel/health
OKX.AI Agent #7584 — https://www.okx.ai/agents/7584
OKX Payment SDK guide — https://web3.okx.com/onchainos/dev-docs/payments/service-seller-sdk
Settlement proof — https://www.oklink.com/xlayer/tx/0x0839c4f2f2dd798e278f3517a88bf2dc7af02150a1c1529b08797db972afb01b
EVIDIQ main repository — https://github.com/evidiq/evidiq
EVIDIQ Notary — https://github.com/evidiq/evidiq-notary-mcp
EVIDIQ Operator — https://github.com/evidiq/evidiq-operator
0G Labs — https://0g.ai
x402 Protocol — https://x402.org
License
MIT © 2026 EVIDIQ — see LICENSE. Part of the EVIDIQ trust and execution layer for the AI agent economy.
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/evidiq/evidiq-sentinel-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server