Skip to main content
Glama
yongjip

io.github.yongjip/mergetrain

by yongjip

mergetrain

CI PyPI Python License: MIT

Safely integrate committed branches from parallel coding agents.

mergetrain is a local merge queue for parallel LLM agents. These coding agents use large language models and work in Git worktrees. mergetrain runs on your machine. A train is a group of queued task branches. A gate is a configured test or check. Each agent commits and enqueues its branch. One runner merges branches in enqueue order and runs gates on the combined result. It updates your Git refs atomically only after explicit approval.

mergetrain is designed for one operator managing local repositories.

There is no mergetrain account, hosted control plane, OAuth app, or product telemetry. Queue and runner state stay on your machine. Only your configured Git remote and trusted gate or verification commands may contact external services.

The problem

Worktrees let several agents edit one repository without sharing a checkout. They do not decide landing order, test the combined result, prevent push races, or tell you what happened if a laptop dies mid-push.

Without a shared integration workflow, the operator chooses branch order and resolves cross-branch failures. The operator also reruns tests and controls pushes. Repeating these actions can slow parallel work.

mergetrain records this workflow in a durable local queue:

agent branches → ordered queue → isolated integration worktree → combined gates
               → explicit approval → one atomic push → post-push verification

Related MCP server: AgentSync MCP Server

Who should use it?

Use mergetrain when:

  • multiple coding agents finish branches in the same repository throughout the day;

  • agents work in Git worktrees and should enqueue rather than push deploy refs;

  • the combined result must pass local tests before it lands;

  • you want unattended processing only for explicitly pre-approved jobs; or

  • one local hub should show queues and runners across several repositories.

It is harness-agnostic: Codex, Claude Code, agy, scripts, and humans all use the same CLI and JSON contract.

Who should not use it?

You probably do not need mergetrain when:

  • one person or agent lands one branch at a time;

  • every change already goes through a PR and your forge-native merge queue;

  • you need a hosted review UI, organization-wide permission system, or remote runner service; or

  • you are looking for a general job queue, CI provider, or deployment platform.

For PR-first teams, use GitHub Merge Queue or GitLab Merge Trains. mergetrain is for local-agent, worktree-first integration, with or before a PR.

Enforcement boundary

Lease tokens fence concurrent and stale mergetrain runners. They do not intercept an arbitrary git push from a task agent that has shell access and an integration-branch credential. To make “one runner owns the push” an enforced property rather than a protocol assumption, use this topology:

task agents: commit + exact-SHA enqueue; no integration push credential
runner:      separate deploy identity
remote:      protected integration branch; runner or reviewed PR path only

Without credential separation and remote protection, mergetrain still provides safe train assembly and recovery semantics, but it cannot prevent a participant from bypassing the queue. See the security boundary.

See it in 60 seconds

uvx mergetrain demo

The demo creates a disposable repository and local bare remote, then runs four real branches through merges in enqueue order, a combined-only gate failure, conflict attribution, and deployment of the compatible train. Use --keep to inspect the result afterward.

Install and first run

# Install the machine-level CLI
uv tool install mergetrain          # or: pipx install mergetrain
# macOS: brew install yongjip/tap/mergetrain

# Codex: add the Git marketplace, then install the native skill + pinned MCP server
codex plugin marketplace add yongjip/mergetrain --ref main
codex plugin add mergetrain@mergetrain

# agy: install the native skill + pinned MCP server
agy plugin install https://github.com/yongjip/mergetrain

Initialize the repository:

cd /path/to/your/repo
mergetrain init --project my-app --write

Add at least one project gate to .mergetrain.yaml. A new configuration has gates: [], so it runs no project tests. For a Python project that uses pytest:

gates:
  - name: tests
    run: python -B -m pytest -q -p no:cacheprovider

Use test commands for your project. Gates must leave the assembled checkout unchanged. init also creates AGENTS.mergetrain.md and CLAUDE.mergetrain.md. Link them from your existing AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md. Commit and land the configuration and instructions through your normal integration path before creating task worktrees.

After the task agent commits a clean branch in its own worktree:

mergetrain status --json
mergetrain enqueue \
  --task "add health check" \
  --branch agent/health

The task agent stops after enqueueing. From the operator checkout, run these commands when validation and deployment are authorized:

mergetrain status
mergetrain deploy

For long-running gates, run mergetrain validate earlier; it never pushes and leaves one exact train Ready for the later deploy confirmation.

deploy names the configured atomic Git ref update; it does not imply an App Store, Kubernetes, or other provider release.

Agents commit and enqueue. One runner owns merge → test → push → verify. Unattended daemons process only jobs that a human explicitly enqueued with --auto. For manual jobs, daemon --validate-only can run merge and gates in the background, but it pauses at the validated-train approval boundary and never pushes.

See the quickstart for configuration, daemon, and multi-repository Hub setup.

Integrating parallel Claude Code sessions and Codex worktrees

Use a Git worktree merge queue when parallel Claude Code sessions or parallel Codex worktrees produce committed branches in the same repository. The plugin install guide connects either client to the queue. Task agents commit, enqueue, and stop. A separately authorized runner tests the combined branches and handles the push.

Why not just worktrees and git merge?

Worktrees solve parallel editing. mergetrain solves serialized integration.

Integration concern

Worktrees + manual merge

mergetrain

Landing order

A person or agent decides repeatedly

Durable queue in enqueue order

Combined validation

Rerun manually after each merge

Gates run over the exact assembled train

Cross-branch failure

Diagnose by hand

Isolation runs identify the conflicting pair

Push ownership

Every session can race the ref

One lease-fenced runner owns the push

Approval

Shell convention

Explicit validate/deploy intent; --auto is opt-in

Crash recovery

Infer from local logs

Reconcile SQLite evidence against remote refs

Agents keep their separate worktrees. One mergetrain runner integrates their committed results.

Why not GitHub or GitLab merge queues?

They solve a related problem for a different operating model.

Forge-native queue

mergetrain

Primary unit

Pull/merge request

Committed local task branch

Validation

Forge merge group + remote CI

Local assembled train + shell gates

Review

Built-in conversation and approvals

No code-review UI

Infrastructure

Forge integration and hosted services

Local SQLite, Git worktrees, any Git remote

Best fit

PR-first teams and distributed review

High-throughput local agent integration

The models can coexist: push a validated train to a review branch and open one PR, or reserve individual PRs for changes that need discussion. The PR workflow guide covers direct, one-PR, split-PR, and validation-only patterns.

Recovering an interrupted Git push

A stopped or timed-out Git push does not prove whether the remote accepted the update. mergetrain records deployment evidence. Its recovery procedure checks remote refs before another attempt. Start with mergetrain status --json and follow the reported recovery action and its approval requirement. See the recovery guide.

Core safety guarantees

  • Exact train identity. Approval names the task HEADs and integration base; changed branches or a moved base cannot silently reuse that approval.

  • Combined gates before push. A green branch is not enough. The assembled train passes the configured gates, or nothing lands.

  • One fenced mergetrain owner. SQLite claims and lease tokens prevent concurrent or stale mergetrain runners from mutating the same train; remote enforcement additionally requires the credential topology above.

  • Atomic remote update. Payload refs and a permanent refs/mergetrain/deploys/<sha> recovery ref update together.

  • Remote-truth recovery. Write-ahead markers and pinned commits let reconcile determine whether a killed push landed, without replaying a successful deploy or calling a missing one shipped.

  • Explicit automation. A bare run never deploys. Daemons touch only pre-approved --auto jobs whose destination and gate/reuse/verify policy still match, and MCP deploy still requires attributable human confirmation.

  • One state entry point. status projects internal detail into Waiting, Running, Ready, Attention, and Done, and returns the next safe command. inspect supplies job-level evidence only when it is needed.

Queue state, locking, train assembly, and gates stay local. Your configured Git remote and post-push verification may still use external services. Gate and verify commands are trusted code; review the security boundary before enabling unattended jobs.

These guarantees are exercised on macOS and Linux across Python 3.10–3.14 and on Windows, including real-Git fault injection around git push --atomic. A dedicated soak repository completed 20 landed trains at a 100% land rate, including planned conflict recovery and a real killed-push reconciliation whose verdict matched the remote. See the soak evidence, then use mergetrain stats --json to inspect evidence from your own queue.

Go deeper

Stable interface

The normal CLI is deliberately limited to six verbs:

init  status  enqueue  validate  deploy  inspect

Version 3 is the long-lived product grammar. There is no planned v4: new capabilities must fit these verbs or stay in advanced operator surfaces, and the v3 JSON and MCP contracts evolve additively apart from the contract bumps recorded in the compatibility policy.

The latest published release is shown by the PyPI badge above. Issues and operating reports are welcome on GitHub.

License

Released under the MIT License.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Exposes a governed, provenance-grounded autonomous delivery pipeline as an MCP server, enabling AI coding assistants like Claude Code or Codex to initiate requirements-to-PR workflows with human approval gates and full audit.
    855 PyPI
    13
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables multiple AI coding agents to collaborate on the same Git repository without conflicts through isolated worktrees, file locking, automated test verification, and a serialized merge queue.
    4 npm
    7
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides a local-first MCP server for AI-native software delivery, enabling structured specifications, human approval gates, controlled repository operations, verification evidence, review, and traceability.
    Apache 2.0