leanscreen
leanscreen is an MCP server that screens informal↔Lean 4 statement pairs for faithfulness defects, helping you catch mismatches between natural-language claims and their formalizations. It provides two tools:
check_fast– Fast, deterministic checks (lints, vacuity/triviality, Lean elaboration) requiring no API key, ~0.1s per statement, ideal for constant use while drafting. Lint checks include unused binders, trivially satisfiable existentials, pinned∃!witnesses, suspicious ℕ-arithmetic, and more; vacuity/triviality checks catch reflexive goals,Truegoals, withheld declarations; Lean 4 elaboration against your own mathlib environment when a REPL is configured.check_deep– Full screen encompassing allcheck_fastchecks plus two independent LLM judges (back-translation and clause-by-clause checklist on separate models) under strict consensus, and an adversarial counterexample probe. Requires an Anthropic API key; costs ~$0.17–0.27 per statement; takes 30–60 seconds. Reports actual API spend. Intended for deliberate use before formalizations ship.
Both tools accept informal (natural language) and lean (Lean 4) inputs, with an optional kind (theorem or definition). Output includes a screening verdict: passed_screening (no defect found, not a certification) or REJECTED with flags. Evidence is ranked: counterexample > deterministic > two-judge-consensus > single-judge.
The server can only reject, not certify faithfulness. Human-rejected pairs pass ~17% (theorems) / 35.6% (definitions) of the time; human-certified pairs are flagged 15–18%. Every flag is a candidate for human confirmation.
Configure via environment variables (Lean project path, REPL path, Anthropic model, timeout, etc.). Use as a command-line tool, MCP server (for Claude Code/Desktop), or Claude Code plugin. Supports .lean files, command-line pairs, or JSONL input, and integrates with Lean+mathlib projects for real elaboration.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@leanscreenCheck if this Lean statement faithfully represents the informal text."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
leanscreen
A calibrated faithfulness screen for informal↔Lean 4 statement pairs, on the command line and over MCP, so you or Claude (Code, Desktop, or any MCP client) can check statements while they are being drafted.
$ leanscreen check Demo.lean
exists_perfect_number: REJECTED lean=valid_in_our_env flags=deterministic-vacuous:reflexive-goal [deterministic]
even_add_even: no defect found lean=valid_in_our_env
screened 2 pair(s): 1 rejected, 0 needs human review, 1 passed screening (no defect found, not a certification)That first theorem compiles and is even provable. Its docstring says "there
exists a natural number equal to the sum of its proper divisors"; its
statement says ∃ n : ℕ, n = n. The compiler has no objection. That gap is
what this tool screens for.
The one thing to understand before using it: this screen may only reject.
passed_screening means "no defect found by this harness". It is not a
certification of faithfulness. Measured against 886 frozen human verdicts,
statements a human reviewer had rejected still passed the full screen 17.0%
of the time for theorems and 35.6% for definitions; statements a human had
certified faithful were flagged 15–18% of the time. Every response carries
this calibration verbatim.
Two tools
check_fast is deterministic only: lints (unused binders, trivially
satisfiable existentials, pinned ∃! witnesses, suspicious ℕ-arithmetic,
and so on), vacuity checks (reflexive goals, True goals, withheld
declarations), and Lean 4 elaboration against your own mathlib environment.
Zero API calls, no key needed, about 0.1s per statement once the REPL is
warm. Call it constantly while drafting.
check_deep runs everything in check_fast, plus two independent LLM
judges under strict consensus (a back-translation judge and a
clause-by-clause checklist judge on separate models) and an adversarial
counterexample probe. It uses your own ANTHROPIC_API_KEY. Measured cost is
roughly $0.17–0.27 per statement, taking 30–60 seconds, and the response
reports actual spend as actual_cost_usd. Call it deliberately, before
something ships.
Both take informal (the natural-language statement), lean (the Lean 4
statement), and an optional kind (theorem | definition, inferred from
the declaration head when omitted). Responses rank their evidence:
counterexample > deterministic > two-judge-consensus > single-judge.
A single-judge flag is explicitly labeled as below the reporting bar.
Related MCP server: Chiasmus
Install
pip install leanscreenRequires Python ≥3.12. Runtime dependencies are httpx, pydantic,
pydantic-settings, and mcp. Nothing else.
Command line
leanscreen check screens once and exits; the bare leanscreen command
still runs the MCP server. Three input shapes:
leanscreen check --informal "The sum of two even integers is even." --lean "theorem t (a b : Int) (ha : Even a) (hb : Even b) : Even (a + b)"leanscreen check pairs.jsonlleanscreen check MyFile.leanThe .lean form pairs each theorem/lemma/def with the /-- ... -/
doc comment above it and screens every documented declaration in the file;
undocumented declarations are skipped with a note. The default is the free
fast screen. --deep adds the judges and probe on your own
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, with --budget USD as a hard stop. --json writes
one full payload object per line to stdout, everything else to stderr.
Exit codes are a CI contract: 0 means nothing was rejected (no defect
found, which is not a certification), 1 means at least one pair was
rejected on reject-tier evidence, 2 means a usage or configuration
error. A formalization repo can run leanscreen check src/*.lean in CI
and fail the build on unscreened defects.
Claude Code plugin
This repo is also a Claude Code plugin, and its own marketplace. Beyond
registering the MCP server for you, the plugin ships a skill that makes
Claude screen habitually: check_fast after drafting any Lean statement,
check_deep offered (with its cost stated) before formalizations ship, and
results always reported as screening rather than certification.
pip install leanscreenthen inside Claude Code:
/plugin marketplace add ibrahimmian36/leanscreen
/plugin install leanscreen@millennium-research/leanscreen:screen <file> runs a fast pass over every pair in a file
(--deep opts into the paid judges after a cost confirmation). Uninstall
with /plugin uninstall leanscreen. The pip install still matters, since
the plugin launches the leanscreen command from your PATH.
Lean setup (optional but recommended)
Without a Lean project the server still runs; check_fast does lints +
vacuity and says plainly that elaboration was skipped. With one, statements
are elaborated for real:
A Lean 4 project with mathlib, built:
lake buildinside it.The community REPL, built against the same toolchain:
lake buildinside the repl repo gives you.lake/build/bin/repl.lakeon the server's PATH.
mathlib imports once at server startup, taking about 100 seconds in the background. Calls arriving mid-warm-up answer immediately with a "still warming" note, then each check takes ~0.1s.
Configuration
Environment variables (or a .env in the working directory), all
LEANSCREEN_-prefixed:
Variable | Default | Meaning |
| unset | Lean 4 + mathlib project (elaboration off when unset) |
| unset | community REPL binary; without it every check pays a full |
|
| per-statement Lean budget |
|
| judge A + probe |
|
| checklist judge (calibrated default; locked-surface models get a 32k token budget automatically) |
|
| judge A response budget |
| unset | needed for |
Claude Code (.mcp.json in your project) or Claude Desktop
(claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"lean-faithfulness-screen": {
"command": "leanscreen",
"env": {
"LEANSCREEN_LEAN_PROJECT_PATH": "/path/to/your/lean-mathlib-project",
"LEANSCREEN_LEAN_REPL_PATH": "/path/to/repl/.lake/build/bin/repl",
"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "sk-ant-…"
}
}
}
}What this does not guarantee
The judge configuration was calibrated 2026-07-15 against 886 frozen human verdicts (595 faithful / 291 unfaithful) from a production research-math corpus. Under strict two-judge consensus, human-rejected pairs still passed 17.0% (theorems) / 35.6% (definitions) of the time, and human-certified pairs were flagged 15–18% of the time. Both judges are Anthropic-family models, so correlated blind spots cannot be ruled out. The counterexample probe confabulates: on one PutnamBench sample its counterexamples were wrong 4 times out of 5. That calibration ran judge A on claude-opus-4-8; the shipped default is now claude-opus-5, and the recalibration against the frozen verdicts has not been run yet. Treat every flag as a candidate for human confirmation and every pass as "nothing found", never "faithful."
Human certification, meaning an expert reviewer confirming that the Lean means the informal statement, is what this screen deliberately does not automate. We offer it as a service: contact ibrahimnmian@gmail.com.
License
FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0 (the Functional Source License): free to use, copy, modify, and redistribute, including internal commercial use, non-commercial education and research, and professional services, but not to offer as a competing commercial product or service. Each version automatically becomes Apache 2.0 two years after its release, the same license as mathlib. It is not OSI-approved until the conversion, so read it before building on it commercially.
Provenance
Extracted from Millennium Research's private formalization platform (2026-07-28); the detector stack, judge prompts, and calibration figures are the ones behind our benchmark audits. The miniF2F and ProofNet# filings are public, and the PutnamBench, ProofNetVerif, and CLEVER audits have been shared with their maintainers. The calibration data is not included.
Project page: millenniumresearch.ai/leanscreen
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Tools
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives small LLMs verified symbolic-math & logic tools.Last updated62Apache 2.0
- Alicense-qualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives LLMs access to formal verification via Z3 and SWI-Prolog, plus tree-sitter-based source code analysis. Translates natural language problems into formal logic using a template-based pipeline, verifies results with mathematical certainty, and analyzes call graphs for reachability, dead code, and impact analysis.Last updated82202Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes the Prova reasoning verifier, enabling AI agents to verify their own reasoning and kernel-check Lean 4 proofs before outputting answers.Last updated5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAirtight math tools an AI uses over MCP — 3.7M-theorem search, PSLQ constant ID, OEIS, real Lean kernel checks, applicability checklists. No LLM inside, no API key.Last updated129Apache 2.0
Related MCP Connectors
Read-only MCP over an agentic SLR workspace with per-claim citation verification
Read-only MCP over an agentic SLR workspace with per-claim citation verification
MCP server for the Fail Modes taxonomy — a knowledge base of AI system failure modes
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ibrahimmian36/leanscreen'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server