Nano Banana MCP Server
The Nano Banana MCP Server provides AI agents with access to the Nano Banana image generation model line on RunAPI, enabling image creation, editing, task management, and pricing lookups.
text_to_image– Generate images usingnano-banana,nano-banana-2, ornano-banana-pro, with control over aspect ratio (including ultra-wide formats like1:4,8:1), output format (png,jpeg,jpg), and output resolution (1k,2k,4k).edit_image– Submit image editing tasks using thenano-banana-editmodel, with options for aspect ratio and output format.get_task– Fetch the current status and result payload (including output URLs) for an existing task by providing its task ID and action type.check_pricing– Look up the current pricing snapshot for any Nano Banana model and endpoint — no API key required.Flexible execution: Both creation tools support a
waitparameter to either poll until completion or return immediately with a task ID for later retrieval, with configurabletimeout_msandpoll_interval_ms. Creating and polling tasks requires aRUNAPI_API_KEY.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Nano Banana MCP Servergenerate a text-to-image of a dragon"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Why This Package?
@runapi.ai/nano-banana-mcp is a focused Model Context Protocol server for the Nano Banana model line on RunAPI.
It gives MCP-compatible assistants direct access to 2 endpoints and 5 model variants without loading the full RunAPI catalog.
Use this per-model server when an agent should stay scoped to Nano Banana. Use @runapi.ai/mcp when one assistant should discover every RunAPI model line.
Related MCP server: GPT Image MCP Server
Install
Add it to Claude Code:
claude mcp add nano-banana -s user -- npx -y @runapi.ai/nano-banana-mcpUse project scope when the server should be shared with a repository:
claude mcp add nano-banana -s project -- npx -y @runapi.ai/nano-banana-mcpCodex, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Roo Code, and other MCP hosts can use the same stdio command:
{
"mcpServers": {
"nano-banana": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@runapi.ai/nano-banana-mcp"]
}
}
}check_pricing works before sign-in. For task creation and status polling, ask your assistant to call the login tool. It opens a browser login and saves credentials to ~/.config/runapi/config.json, the same file used by runapi login.
Headless and CI hosts can still set RUNAPI_API_KEY before starting the MCP host.
Ready-made examples are in examples/ for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, and Roo Code.
Tools
Tool | Auth | Purpose |
| Yes | Create a Nano Banana edit image task and optionally wait for a terminal status. Returns the task id, status, and output URLs. |
| Yes | Create a Nano Banana text to image task and optionally wait for a terminal status. Returns the task id, status, and output URLs. |
| Yes | Fetch the current status and latest payload for an existing task. |
| No | Look up current pricing for a Nano Banana model and endpoint. |
Models
Nano Banana covers 5 model variants across 2 endpoints. Each tool accepts the models listed for it:
Tool | Models |
|
|
|
|
Model availability can change between releases. Use check_pricing or the Nano Banana model page for the current catalog view.
Agent Prompts
Ask your assistant in natural language; it can inspect pricing, create the task, and return the task id plus output URLs.
Create a task
Run a Nano Banana edit image task with RunAPI.The assistant can call check_pricing, then edit_image, and return the task id, status, and output URLs.
Submit without waiting
Create the task but don't wait for it to finish.The assistant calls the create tool with wait: false and returns the task id. Check on it later with get_task.
Check pricing before creating
Check current Nano Banana pricing, then create the task if it matches my request.The assistant calls check_pricing and can link to the Nano Banana model page for the canonical catalog entry.
Configuration
The server resolves auth in this order:
RUNAPI_API_KEYenvironment variable, useful for headless and CI hosts~/.config/runapi/config.json, created by the MCPlogintool orrunapi loginNo key, which still allows
check_pricing
The config file is normally managed by login. A pre-provisioned headless config can use:
{
"apiKey": "your_runapi_key"
}Do not commit real API keys.
Links
Resource | URL |
Nano Banana model page | |
npm package | |
GitHub repository | |
RunAPI MCP overview | |
RunAPI docs |
License
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.
Available Tools
5 toolscheck_pricingB
Look up RunAPI pricing for the nano-banana model line.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | No | Model slug. Defaults to the line's primary model. | |
| action | No | Endpoint name. Defaults to the endpoint that offers the model. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. 'Look up' implies a non-mutating read, which is helpful, but the description does not confirm read-only behavior, describe the shape of the pricing result, or mention any caching/rate-limit behavior. For a simple lookup this is acceptable but thin.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single front-loaded sentence with no filler. The resource and scope are stated immediately with zero redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a two-optional-parameter read tool this is close, but with no output schema the description should say what pricing information is returned (per-endpoint cost, units, currency). That gap leaves the agent unsure what to expect from the call.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and both parameters are documented in the schema, including the defaults and the endpoint enum. The description adds no syntax, format, or defaulting detail beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb ('look up'), resource ('pricing'), and scope ('nano-banana model line'), which is enough for an agent to distinguish it from the sibling tools (login, edit_image, text_to_image, get_task), none of which concern pricing. It is clear but does not explicitly contrast itself with an alternative.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no statement of when to call this versus alternatives, no preconditions, and no exclusions. Usage is only implied by the tool's name and the resource it targets.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
edit_imageC
Create a Nano Banana task on RunAPI (edit image). Returns a task id, status, and output URLs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| wait | No | Poll until the task reaches a terminal status. | |
| model | No | RunAPI model slug for this model line. | |
| prompt | No | Declared type: string. | |
| timeout_ms | No | ||
| aspect_ratio | No | Declared type: string. Known values: "1:1", "1:4", "1:8", "2:3", "3:2", "3:4", "4:1", "4:3", "4:5", "5:4", "8:1", "9:16", "16:9", "21:9", "auto". | |
| callback_url | No | Declared type: string. | |
| output_format | No | Declared type: string. Known values: "png", "jpeg". | |
| poll_interval_ms | No | ||
| source_image_urls | Yes | Declared type: array. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it discloses only the return shape (task id, status, output URLs). It never explains the asynchronous task model, what the wait/poll_interval_ms/timeout_ms parameters do to execution, whether callback_url is needed, or any cost/auth implications.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences with no filler, and the core action plus return contract are front-loaded. It is efficient, though the brevity is part of the reason behavioral context is thin.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a 9-parameter asynchronous mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It names the return fields but omits polling/timeout semantics, callback behavior, and how source_image_urls drives the edit, leaving the agent under-informed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 78%, so most fields are documented in the schema, and the description adds nothing beyond them. Notably prompt, source_image_urls, timeout_ms and poll_interval_ms carry no meaningful schema description either, leaving several of the 9 parameters opaque in both places.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a concrete verb and resource ("Create a ... task") and names the operation (edit image), which separates it from text_to_image by implying source-image input. The model name "Nano Banana" and platform "RunAPI" are niche identifiers, but the action is unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no when-to-use guidance and no mention of the sibling text_to_image, which is the obvious alternative for image generation without a source image. An agent must infer the choice from the parenthetical "(edit image)" alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_taskA
Fetch the current status and latest result payload for a nano-banana task.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | Yes | Asynchronous endpoint the task was created on. | |
| task_id | Yes | Task id returned when the task was created. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full disclosure burden. It implies a repeatable read ('current status') and indicates a result payload is returned, which is useful, but it omits what happens for pending/failed tasks, whether results are retained or expire, and whether polling is required.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single front-loaded sentence with zero waste; the verb and the returned data are both stated immediately.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
There is no output schema, so the description correctly names what is returned ('current status and latest result payload'). For a simple two-parameter poll tool this is nearly sufficient, with only task-state and failure behavior left unstated.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so both task_id and the action enum are already documented in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning about how task_id or action correlate with task creation, so the baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource: 'Fetch the current status and latest result payload for a nano-banana task.' This clearly distinguishes it from the async creation siblings (edit_image, text_to_image), though it never explicitly names itself as their polling counterpart.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is only implied: fetching 'current status' suggests polling a task created via edit_image/text_to_image, but the description never states when to call it, how often, or what to do instead. No alternatives or exclusions are named.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
loginA
Authenticate RunAPI by opening a browser PKCE login flow and saving the API key to ~/.config/runapi/config.json.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| force | No | Re-run browser login when the current credential comes from the local config file. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden. It discloses the interactive browser flow and the file write side effect (config.json). However, it does not mention that it may overwrite existing credentials or that it could block waiting for user input, though these are implied.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the action ('Authenticate RunAPI') and provides necessary details without extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple login tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description covers the core purpose and side effect. It lacks an explicit statement that this is a prerequisite for other tools, but that is implied.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (the only parameter 'force' has a description). The tool description adds no additional meaning about parameters beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb ('Authenticate'), target resource ('RunAPI'), method ('browser PKCE login flow'), and side effect (saving to config.json). It is distinct from sibling tools, none of which relate to authentication.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage (to authenticate RunAPI) but does not explicitly say when to run it (e.g., before other RunAPI tools) or when to use the 'force' parameter. Since there are no alternative auth tools among siblings, 'vs alternatives' is not applicable.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
text_to_imageC
Create a Nano Banana task on RunAPI (text to image). Returns a task id, status, and output URLs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| wait | No | Poll until the task reaches a terminal status. | |
| model | No | RunAPI model slug for this model line. | |
| prompt | No | Declared type: string. | |
| timeout_ms | No | ||
| aspect_ratio | No | Declared type: string. Known values: "1:1", "9:16", "16:9", "3:4", "4:3", "3:2", "2:3", "5:4", "4:5", "21:9", "auto", "1:4", "1:8", "4:1", "8:1". | |
| callback_url | No | Declared type: string. | |
| output_format | No | Declared type: string. Known values: "png", "jpeg", "jpg". | |
| poll_interval_ms | No | ||
| output_resolution | No | Declared type: string. | |
| reference_image_urls | No | Declared type: array. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses return values (task id, status, output URLs), which is useful, but says nothing about cost/credits (despite a check_pricing sibling), auth requirements, or what the wait/poll behavior means in practice.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action and returning the output contract. Nothing is wasted, though the vendor jargon costs a little clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a 10-parameter generation tool with zero required params, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is thin. It omits cost implications, the meaning of wait/timeout/poll_interval, and callback_url semantics that an agent needs to invoke it well.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 80%, so the schema already documents most parameters; the description adds no syntax or format detail. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb+resource ("Create a Nano Banana task") and disambiguates with "(text to image)", which separates it from the sibling edit_image. The jargon "Nano Banana task on RunAPI" is vendor-specific but the parenthetical makes the intent clear.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use guidance and no routing to alternatives: it never says to use edit_image for modifying an existing image or get_task to poll results. With a close sibling (edit_image) present, the absence of any differentiation is a real gap.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
4 tool updates
v0.2.0- Changed
check_pricing2 fields changed- removed
Input schema / additionalPropertiesRemoved value: -false - removed
Input schema / properties / model / enumRemoved value: -[ - "nano-banana-2-lite", - "nano-banana-edit", - "nano-banana", - "nano-banana-2", - "nano-banana-pro" -]
- Changed
edit_image13 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +{} - removed
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / anyOfRemoved value: -[ - { - "const": "1:1", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "1:4", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "1:8", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "2:3", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "3:2", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "3:4", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "4:1", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "4:3", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "4:5", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "5:4", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "8:1", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "9:16", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "16:9", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "21:9", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "auto", - "type": "string" - } -] - added
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: string. Known values: \"1:1\", \"1:4\", \"1:8\", \"2:3\", \"3:2\", \"3:4\", \"4:1\", \"4:3\", \"4:5\", \"5:4\", \"8:1\", \"9:16\", \"16:9\", \"21:9\", \"auto\"." - added
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / typeAdded value: +"string" - added
Input schema / properties / callback_url / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: string." - removed
Input schema / properties / model / enumRemoved value: -[ - "nano-banana-2-lite", - "nano-banana-edit" -] - removed
Input schema / properties / output_format / anyOfRemoved value: -[ - { - "const": "png", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "jpeg", - "type": "string" - } -] - added
Input schema / properties / output_format / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: string. Known values: \"png\", \"jpeg\"." - added
Input schema / properties / output_format / typeAdded value: +"string" - added
Input schema / properties / prompt / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: string." - removed
Input schema / properties / prompt / maxLengthRemoved value: -20000 - removed
Input schema / properties / prompt / minLengthRemoved value: -1 - added
Input schema / properties / source_image_urls / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: array."
- Changed
get_task1 field changed- removed
Input schema / additionalPropertiesRemoved value: -false
- Changed
text_to_image13 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +{} - removed
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / anyOfRemoved value: -[ - { - "const": "1:1", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "9:16", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "16:9", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "3:4", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "4:3", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "3:2", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "2:3", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "5:4", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "4:5", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "21:9", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "auto", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "1:4", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "1:8", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "4:1", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "8:1", - "type": "string" - } -] - added
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: string. Known values: \"1:1\", \"9:16\", \"16:9\", \"3:4\", \"4:3\", \"3:2\", \"2:3\", \"5:4\", \"4:5\", \"21:9\", \"auto\", \"1:4\", \"1:8\", \"4:1\", \"8:1\"." - added
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / typeAdded value: +"string" - added
Input schema / properties / callback_url / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: string." - removed
Input schema / properties / model / enumRemoved value: -[ - "nano-banana", - "nano-banana-2", - "nano-banana-2-lite", - "nano-banana-pro" -] - removed
Input schema / properties / output_format / anyOfRemoved value: -[ - { - "const": "png", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "jpeg", - "type": "string" - }, - { - "const": "jpg", - "type": "string" - } -] - added
Input schema / properties / output_format / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: string. Known values: \"png\", \"jpeg\", \"jpg\"." - added
Input schema / properties / output_format / typeAdded value: +"string" - added
Input schema / properties / output_resolution / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: string." - added
Input schema / properties / prompt / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: string." - added
Input schema / properties / reference_image_urls / descriptionAdded value: +"Declared type: array." - added
Input schema / requiredAdded value: +[]
5 tool updates
v0.1.12- Changed
check_pricing1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / model / enumPrevious value: -[ - "nano-banana-edit", - "nano-banana", - "nano-banana-2", - "nano-banana-pro" -]New value: +[ + "nano-banana-2-lite", + "nano-banana-edit", + "nano-banana", + "nano-banana-2", + "nano-banana-pro" +]
- Changed
edit_image14 fields changed- removed
Input schema / additionalPropertiesRemoved value: -false - added
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "const": "1:1", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "1:4", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "1:8", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "2:3", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "3:2", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "3:4", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "4:1", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "4:3", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "4:5", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "5:4", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "8:1", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "9:16", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "16:9", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "21:9", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "auto", + "type": "string" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / enumRemoved value: -[ - "1:1", - "9:16", - "16:9", - "3:4", - "4:3", - "3:2", - "2:3", - "5:4", - "4:5", - "21:9", - "auto" -] - removed
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / callback_urlAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / model / enumPrevious value: -[ - "nano-banana-edit" -]New value: +[ + "nano-banana-2-lite", + "nano-banana-edit" +] - added
Input schema / properties / output_format / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "const": "png", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "jpeg", + "type": "string" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / output_format / enumRemoved value: -[ - "png", - "jpeg" -] - removed
Input schema / properties / output_format / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / poll_interval_ms / maximumAdded value: +9007199254740991 - added
Input schema / properties / promptAdded value: +{ + "maxLength": 20000, + "minLength": 1, + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / source_image_urlsAdded value: +{ + "items": {}, + "type": "array" +} - added
Input schema / properties / timeout_ms / maximumAdded value: +9007199254740991 - added
Input schema / requiredAdded value: +[ + "source_image_urls" +]
- Changed
get_task1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / action / descriptionPrevious value: -"Endpoint the task was created on."New value: +"Asynchronous endpoint the task was created on."
- Added
login - Changed
text_to_image14 fields changed- removed
Input schema / additionalPropertiesRemoved value: -false - added
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "const": "1:1", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "9:16", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "16:9", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "3:4", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "4:3", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "3:2", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "2:3", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "5:4", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "4:5", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "21:9", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "auto", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "1:4", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "1:8", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "4:1", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "8:1", + "type": "string" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / enumRemoved value: -[ - "1:1", - "9:16", - "16:9", - "3:4", - "4:3", - "3:2", - "2:3", - "5:4", - "4:5", - "21:9", - "auto", - "1:4", - "1:8", - "4:1", - "8:1" -] - removed
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / callback_urlAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / model / enumPrevious value: -[ - "nano-banana", - "nano-banana-2", - "nano-banana-pro" -]New value: +[ + "nano-banana", + "nano-banana-2", + "nano-banana-2-lite", + "nano-banana-pro" +] - added
Input schema / properties / output_format / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "const": "png", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "jpeg", + "type": "string" + }, + { + "const": "jpg", + "type": "string" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / output_format / enumRemoved value: -[ - "png", - "jpeg", - "jpg" -] - removed
Input schema / properties / output_format / typeRemoved value: -"string" - removed
Input schema / properties / output_resolution / enumRemoved value: -[ - "1k", - "2k", - "4k" -] - added
Input schema / properties / poll_interval_ms / maximumAdded value: +9007199254740991 - added
Input schema / properties / promptAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / reference_image_urlsAdded value: +{ + "items": {}, + "type": "array" +} - added
Input schema / properties / timeout_ms / maximumAdded value: +9007199254740991
4 tool updates
v0.1.0- First observed
check_pricing - First observed
edit_image - First observed
get_task - First observed
text_to_image
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: auth (login), pricing lookup (check_pricing), two creation paths split by modality (edit_image vs text_to_image), and polling (get_task). No two tools overlap—edit_image and text_to_image are cleanly separated by whether an input image is involved, while get_task handles result retrieval.
Consistent snake_case verb_noun convention (check_pricing, edit_image, text_to_image, get_task). The lone exception is 'login', a bare verb with no object, though it stays in snake_case and is unambiguous.
Five tools is well-scoped for a single model-line integration: authentication, pricing, two generation modes, and result polling. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy or filler.
Covers the core lifecycle—authenticate, check cost, submit edit/text-to-image tasks, and poll results. Minor gaps exist: no list_tasks or cancel/delete task operation, and no explicit reference-image upload, but agents can work around these.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
130+ AI models for image, video, music, and audio — 18 model families, one RunAPI account.
- ZurelayOAuthcom.zurelay
Make images, videos and speech: Nano Banana, GPT Image, Seedance, Kling, Wan and Gemini TTS.
Images, video & speech: Nano Banana, GPT Image, Veo, Omni, Wan, Grok, Gemini TTS. Crypto or card.
LLM chat, text tools, image generation, editing, batch image jobs, and asynchronous video generation
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables creating, polling, and checking pricing for Seedream image generation tasks (edit and text-to-image) through a single RunAPI API key.6111 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables creating and managing GPT Image tasks (edit and text-to-image) via RunAPI, with options to poll status and check pricing.5110 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI image and video generation tasks (text-to-image, image-to-video, edit, upscale, etc.) via RunAPI, with support for polling and pricing lookups.10120 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables background removal and upscaling of images using Recraft models via RunAPI, with task polling and pricing lookup.565 npmApache 2.0