lema
OfficialProvides access to recorded decision rationale from Kubernetes' KEPs, enabling AI agents to check if an approach was already ruled out or is the settled choice, with cited sources.
Provides access to recorded decision rationale from React's RFCs, enabling AI agents to check if an approach was already ruled out or is the settled choice, with cited sources.
Provides access to recorded decision rationale from Rust's RFCs, enabling AI agents to check if an approach was already ruled out or is the settled choice, with cited sources.
lema-mcp
Your coding agent can read the code. It can't read the argument behind it.
lema-mcp gives your agent the recorded why — and the alternatives a project
already ruled out — cited to the source. For React, Kubernetes, and Rust out of
the box, and for your own repo with one command.
A local MCP server. No account, no database, no network for your own repo — install it in 30 seconds and ask why a project decided something, or whether the approach you're about to take was already rejected.
❌ Without lema
The agent invents the why from training recall — fluently, and sometimes wrongly. The rationale lives in RFC / KEP / PR threads; it was never in the code.
It re-proposes the approach the maintainers already rejected two years ago — because a rejected alternative leaves no trace in the source.
Ask "was this ever ruled out?" and you get a confident guess, with no way to tell a real ruling from a hallucinated one.
Related MCP server: codecortex
✅ With lema
One cited answer from the project's actual recorded deliberation — every
[n]links to the RFC / PR where the call was made.A typed
ruled_outverdict when a project already rejected your approach, with the recorded reason and a pointer to where the docs say to do it instead.A typed
settledverdict when your approach is the project's in-force recorded choice — the governing decision cited, with a docs pointer for the how.An honest "no recorded ruling" when the record is silent — which means unknown, not approved. lema never fills the gap with a guess.
lema holds reasoning — why a decision was made, what was rejected — not API syntax or code samples. For those, reach for a docs tool. lema is the right place for why.
Try it in 30 seconds — no account
npx lema-mcp try react # or: kubernetes · rustThat writes a read-only public server to your project's .mcp.json. Reload your
agent's MCP servers (in Claude Code: /mcp) and try the flagship tool,
check_approach — name a direction, get the recorded verdict:
> "Let's add a delayMs prop to Suspense to debounce the fallback." (repo: react)
⛔ ruled_out — the React team considered and rejected this.
"<the recorded rationale, summarized — not a quote>" [1]
Where to look instead → https://react.dev/reference/react
[1] reactjs/rfcs#212
> "I'll add a global event bus for cross-component communication." (repo: react)
◦ no_recorded_ruling — React's public record doesn't settle this.
(Unknown — not approved.)Or just ask in plain language — "why did React adopt Hooks over mixins?" — and get one cited answer, with an honest abstain when the record is silent.
Covered today: React · Kubernetes · Rust, served from lema's public API
(api.lema.sh). Tokenless. It's a curated three-project demo corpus — not
analytics over a graph you own.
Install
No-account public demo (React's recorded decisions, zero setup):
If the Cursor button doesn't open an install prompt (common when the browser can't hand off the cursor:// deeplink), paste this into .cursor/mcp.json (project) or ~/.cursor/mcp.json (global):
{
"mcpServers": {
"lema": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "lema-mcp@latest"],
"env": { "LEMA_MCP_MODE": "public", "LEMA_PUBLIC_REPO": "react-rfcs" }
}
}
}That drops you into React's public record — ask "why did React rule out X?" and get a cited answer, no account. To wire your own repo for capture, or point the demo at Kubernetes or Rust, use the per-client setup below.
npx needs only Node — no Go toolchain, no account. Two commands cover both ways
to use lema:
npx lema-mcp try react # read-only: ask React/Kubernetes/Rust why + what's ruled out
npx lema-mcp init # your repo: decision capture + the never-reopen guardBoth are non-destructive and idempotent — they merge into existing config and
re-running changes nothing. init and try share the same lema server key; the
authed init server is a superset (it serves the public tools too), so the two
coexist and try never downgrades it.
Easiest — let lema write the config and hooks for you:
npx lema-mcp init # or: npx lema-mcp try reactOr add it by hand to .mcp.json (this gets the read + capture tools, but not the
guard/nudge hooks that init installs):
{
"mcpServers": {
"lema": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "lema-mcp@latest"] }
}
}Add to .cursor/mcp.json (project) or ~/.cursor/mcp.json (global):
{
"mcpServers": {
"lema": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "lema-mcp@latest"] }
}
}For the no-account public demo instead, add the env block:
{
"mcpServers": {
"lema": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "lema-mcp@latest"],
"env": { "LEMA_MCP_MODE": "public", "LEMA_PUBLIC_REPO": "react-rfcs" }
}
}
}Settings → Developer → Edit Config, then add to mcpServers:
{
"mcpServers": {
"lema": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "lema-mcp@latest"],
"env": { "LEMA_MCP_MODE": "public", "LEMA_PUBLIC_REPO": "react-rfcs" }
}
}
}Add to ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"lema": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "lema-mcp@latest"] }
}
}Add to .vscode/mcp.json — note VS Code uses the servers key:
{
"servers": {
"lema": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "lema-mcp@latest"] }
}
}go install github.com/lemahq/lema-mcp/cmd/lema-mcp@latestFor the public demo, set LEMA_MCP_MODE=public and LEMA_PUBLIC_REPO=react-rfcs
(k8s-enhancements · rust-rfcs). The public API URL is baked into the binary.
The public config sets only LEMA_MCP_MODE + LEMA_PUBLIC_REPO
(react-rfcs · k8s-enhancements · rust-rfcs) — the API URL is compiled in.
Hosted teams: sign in once; the repository resolves automatically
After you sign in to Lema, save one Organization-scoped credential outside your repositories. The normal setup contains identity credentials, not a copied workspace UUID:
# ~/.config/lema/credentials
LEMA_API_URL=https://api.lema.sh
LEMA_API_TOKEN=lema_live_...chmod 600 ~/.config/lema/credentials
npx lema-mcp@latest doctor contextRestart the coding agent after changing MCP configuration. From then on, Lema matches the checkout's verified Git remote to a Repository, finds its Project, and passes one immutable target receipt to every operation. Opening two repositories in parallel does not create a mutable “active repository,” and each user keeps their own Organization-scoped credential.
For multi-repo Projects, ambiguity recovery, repositories without a remote, worktrees, and compatibility overrides, read Target context: Projects, repositories, and Runs.
Two ways to use it
1. The public record — React, Kubernetes, Rust (read-only, no account)
Ask why a popular project decided something, or check whether a direction was
already rejected, over its recorded RFC/KEP deliberation. This is the try server.
2. Your own repo — capture + never-reopen (local, no account)
Most "context" tools are read-only — a nicer way to grep your docs. lema reads too, but its real job is never-reopen:
Your agent settles a choice → it calls
record_decisionwith the option it chose and the alternatives it rejected, with why each was killed (the part that never survives into the code).Before anyone proposes a direction →
check_decidedreturns the prior decision if that option is CLOSED.On every edit, a PreToolUse guard hook (installed by
init) reads the draft change and surfaces a CLOSED decision before the dead option gets re-proposed — enforced off both your captured decisions and the repo's own ADRs.
Decisions are captured to .lema/decisions.jsonl — a plain append-only file you
commit, so your whole team's agents share the same memory through git. No key, no
LLM call on our side: your agent forms the decision; lema stores it and serves it
back.
What never-reopen looks like
Your agent reaches for an option you already killed — and it comes back CLOSED, with the original reason attached:
⛔ CLOSED — do not propose "SWR": no first-class mutation / cache invalidation — we'd hand-roll it (decided 2026-06-04 · "Data fetching for the web app" · chose TanStack Query)
So the agent surfaces the prior decision instead of re-litigating it. Supersede a
decision and the previously chosen option goes CLOSED too — enforced both ways.
(That's the real output of npx lema-mcp demo, run against a throwaway temp dir.)
The guard is advisory and fail-open: in its default context mode it injects
that note as a non-blocking nudge — it never hard-blocks and never auto-approves an
edit. LEMA_GUARD_MODE=ask prompts you on a strong match; off is a kill switch.
Any error → it emits nothing and gets out of the way.
Available tools
Your agent calls these over MCP.
The public record (no account)
Tool | What it does |
| Name an approach → a three-valued verdict: |
Your own repo
Tool | What it does |
| Capture a settled decision: the chosen option and the rejected alternatives (with why each was killed), plus rationale / refs / |
| Adjudicate one proposed direction against decisions already CLOSED → typed verdict ( |
| Natural-language query → the most relevant atomic claims (chosen / rejected / constraint / consequence) with their source ADR, under a token budget. |
| One decision's full body; the list by status; traversal of typed edges ( |
| Sectioned, budgeted retrieval over the repo's project markdown (local mode, once a doc tree is indexed) — the matching sections, not whole files. |
| One cited, synthesized answer over your team's hosted decision graph (hosted mode). |
| Resume a hosted Run with a Project-scoped brief: primary-repository state first, then ACL-filtered context from other visible repositories. |
In your own repo the full server registers the read + capture tools (and the public
check_approach too); the npx lema-mcp try server runs the public door only.
lema settle — rule from the terminal (hosted mode)
The package also installs a lema command. settle is the terminal half of
adjudication: it drafts a ruling on a hosted decision and prints the deep
link where your browser click binds it — a terminal credential never
binds anything (that split is structural: programmatic principals cannot
create binding rulings, by design).
lema settle accept <decision-id>... # draft an accept, print the bind link
lema settle reject <decision-id> --reason <why> # proposed drafts only; takes effect immediately
lema settle supersede <decision-id> --by <decision-id> # takes effect immediatelyaccept drafts; reject and supersede apply on the server in the same
request (no browser confirm step exists for them — the command says so).
Decision ids are full UUIDs or unique 6+ character UUID prefixes (d_xxxxxx
locators are content hashes and are refused). Requires hosted identity
credentials (LEMA_API_URL and LEMA_API_TOKEN). LEMA_WORKSPACE_ID is an
optional CI, recovery, or ambiguity override—not normal repository setup.
Why lema is different (the honest part)
lema's brand is its honesty — that's what makes a "why" tool trustworthy:
Abstain ≠ approval. Silence is reported as silence. lema would rather say "no recorded ruling" than manufacture one.
Cited, summarized — not quoted. Answers are grounded in recorded decisions and paraphrased ("the record indicates …"), each claim tied to a followable ref.
Local-first. Capture and enforcement run entirely on your machine, in a file you own. No key, no upload, no model call on our side.
No fabricated graph. A cold import writes no decision→decision edges and no source-authored dates; lema shows what's actually on the record, nothing it can't stand behind.
Does enforcement change what the agent does?
We measured it on two real public repos we didn't write (Backstage, vite),
transcribing six of their documented decisions into record_decision format and
running the real lema-mcp guard binary on the agent's draft edits. 168 trials,
0 errors. The honest result is an existence proof, not "agents are wrong 58% of
the time":
On the one decision that cut against the 2026 frontier model (
node-fetch→ nativefetch), a blind agent re-proposed the killed library 58.3% of the time (14/24); lema drove it to 0% — matching a docs-preloaded arm without carrying the doc in context.On the five decisions the model already gets right, lema stayed silent: 0% re-proposal and 0% false-abstain across 48 trials. No nagging.
A public-repo benchmark understates the value — public decisions are
disproportionately the ones the model already absorbed in training. The decisions
where enforcement moves the needle are proprietary, contrarian, recent,
team-specific. Full method and every raw trial:
./docs/enforcement-lift.
Configuration & privacy
LEMA_GUARD_MODE—context(default, non-blocking),ask(prompt the human on a strong match), oroff.LEMA_DISABLE_QUERY_LOGGING=1— drop query text from the usage log entirely. Otherwise queries are scrubbed for credential-shaped substrings before logging.LEMA_USAGE_LOG/LEMA_QUESTION_LOG/LEMA_GUARD_LOG— opt-in local log files; all off unless set.LEMA_API_URL+LEMA_API_TOKEN— hosted identity credentials. Environment values take precedence over~/.config/lema/credentials.LEMA_WORKSPACE_ID— validated explicit target for CI, recovery, or ambiguity compatibility. Leave it unset for normal Git-backed repositories.
init [dir]— wire a repo for capture: registers the server in.mcp.json, appends a managed capture-protocol block toAGENTS.md, and installs three hooks (a commit reminder, thenudgecapture prompt on dependency-manifest edits, and theguardnever-reopen check). Idempotent.try <react|kubernetes|rust>— wire the read-only public-demo server.demo— a ~30-second never-reopen walkthrough against a throwaway temp dir (nothing written to your repo). The fastest way to see the CLOSED behavior.guard/nudge— the hook bodiesinitinstalls; advisory, fail-open, always exit 0. You don't call them directly.doctor context— resolve the current target and print only privacy-safe evidence, redacted ID suffixes, and one corrective action.context link --project ID --repository ID/context unlink— add or recoverably remove a validated repository-local association for non-Git, no-remote, or ambiguous checkouts.serve(≡--http, default:4321) — serve the engine over localhost HTTP for the Lema Workbench GUI. This is not an MCP Streamable HTTP endpoint; the supported MCP transport in this release is local stdio.
With no flags, lema auto-discovers a decisions directory (docs/adr, doc/adr,
docs/adrs, docs/decisions, docs/architecture/decisions,
architecture/decisions, adr, .adr) and an openspec/ tree. Point it
explicitly with --adr-dir, --repo github.com/org/name (GITHUB_TOKEN for
private), --ref, --pattern, --openspec-dir, or --capture-file.
Hosted retrieval (optional). Set LEMA_API_URL + LEMA_API_TOKEN to point
search_decisions at hosted hybrid retrieval over your full decision layer
(search-only in the MVP). Capture and enforcement are always local.
License
MIT. lema-mcp is the free, local wedge of lema — the system
of record for why. The hosted decision graph, the team why-surface, and the
manager-facing Intelligence layer are at lema.sh.
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Servers
- Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceAutomatically extracts architectural decisions, patterns, and insights from Git commits to build a local, structured project memory. It exposes this living context to AI tools via MCP, allowing them to understand the historical reasoning and evolution behind your codebase.Last updated187MIT
- Alicense-qualityDmaintenancePersistent codebase knowledge layer for AI agents. Pre-digests codebases into structured knowledge (symbols, dependency graphs, co-change patterns, architectural decisions) and serves via MCP. 28 languages, 14 tools, ~85% token reduction.Last updated86MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hosted memory and governance layer for AI coding agents. 28 MCP tools with hybrid search, structured knowledge capture, behavioral nudges, and git-native storage. Zero cloud dependencies.Last updated304Business Source 1.1
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP-native, local-first memory for coding agents that turns real sessions into reusable decisions, gotchas, and domain knowledge.Last updated134MIT
Related MCP Connectors
Secure, user-owned long-term memory for AI agents over OAuth-protected remote MCP. Save, search, recall, update, and govern preferences, project context, decisions, and task state across ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, IDEs, and CLIs.
The project brain for AI coding agents — memory, decisions, sprints, knowledge base via MCP.
Repo intel for AI coding agents: overview, PRs, contributors, hot files, CI, deps. Remote MCP.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lemahq/lema-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server