culprit
culprit
Why an agent needs this
An agent is good at writing a patch and bad at knowing whether the patch is done. It cannot see that the helper it just changed has three other callers, or that the bug it is fixing was introduced by a refactor two years ago. culprit answers both from git history, as structured JSON it can act on rather than prose it has to interpret:
The agent asks | culprit answers |
"What introduced this bug?" | Ranked suspect commits, the author's intent, the releases it shipped in |
"Is my fix complete?" |
|
"What could this change break?" | Reverse-import dependents, covering tests, high-risk shared modules |
⚡️ Instant. No test runs, no bisect. It blames the fix's own lines back through refactors.
🔒 Read-only and offline. Never writes to your repo or PR. No API key, no network.
🔌 MCP-native. 11 tools over stdio, on the official MCP registry, plus a one-command plugin.
🗣️ Language-agnostic. Suspects work anywhere git does. Blast radius reads 12 language families.
Related MCP server: knownissue
Does it actually work?
Benchmarked against 50 real regressions, 25 from git and 25 from
systemd, where the introducing commit is known from each
fix's Fixes: trailer (author-verified ground truth). Given only the fix commit, culprit blames
the removed lines to rank the commits that introduced the bug.
Metric | Result |
Introducing commit ranked #1 | 50% (25/50) |
Introducing commit in the top-5 suspect set | 66% (33/50) |
Deterministic and offline, on large C codebases the engine has never seen. Reproduce with
python benchmarks/run.py, which clones the repos and scores every case.
Quick start
Claude Code plugin (installs the MCP server plus a skill that tells the agent when to use it):
/plugin marketplace add noordeen123/culprit
/plugin install culprit@culpritAny MCP client (Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Codex CLI, Zed, Continue, Cline, Amazon Q, Goose):
{
"mcpServers": {
"culprit": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["--from", "culprit[mcp]", "culprit-mcp"]
}
}
}CLI, no agent required:
uvx culprit # run from PyPI on demand
rca --verify-fix patch.diff # exit 0 if complete, 1 otherwiseNeeds Python 3.10+ and uv for the MCP server. The CLI runs on 3.9+.
The tools
Tool | What it answers |
| Full RCA in one call: classify, suspects or blast radius, risk, test impact |
| Is this diff safe to commit? |
| Rank the commits that introduced the bug |
| Call sites of the changed symbol the fix did not touch |
| The introducing commit's message, linked PR, referenced issues |
| Per-commit history of the buggy lines via |
| QA gate score (0 to 100, low/medium/high) with contributing factors |
| Feature impact: dependents, covering tests, high-risk files |
| Minimal test set to run for this change |
| Bugfix vs feature, with evidence |
| RCA straight from a stack trace, no diff or PR needed |
verify_fix, the pre-commit gate
The agent runs this on its own diff before committing:
verdict:completewhen no untouched call site is left behind,partialwhen one was missed,riskywhen risk is high. The verdict is the completeness axis; test coverage is the separate confidence axis onrisk_level.untouched_references: the exact files that still use the changed symbol. This is the list the agent goes and patches.skipped_symbols,adds_test,notes: what was too widely used to check, whether a test shipped, and what to do next.
Loop until complete, then commit. That is the whole idea.
CLI and CI
rca # current branch vs the configured base
rca --last # the latest commit only
rca --pr 16786 # a specific PR (uses the PR's own base)
rca --trace crash.txt # RCA from a stack trace, no fix or PR needed
rca --verify-fix patch.diff # check a diff before committing
rca --select-tests # print the tests to run for this change
rca --html report.html --open # a single self-contained HTML report
rca --pr 16889 --fail-on high # exit non-zero when QA risk is high
rca serve --repo /path # local web UI with a base pickerCI gate: risk via exit code only, no PR comments, no writes. Copy
examples/github-actions/culprit-pr.yml into
.github/workflows/:
- run: pip install "culprit>=0.3.0"
- env: { GH_TOKEN: "${{ github.token }}" }
run: rca --pr ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} --fail-on highHTML report
--html writes one self-contained file. No CDN, opens offline, attaches to CI. It opens with the
verdict: a scored QA risk with the factors behind it, and the prime suspect with how long the bug
lived.
Then it reconstructs how the bug got there. Every commit that touched the buggy line, from creation through the commit that broke it (red, with the exact diff) to the fix (green):
vs git bisect
| culprit | |
Input | A reliable failing test | The fix diff (or a stack trace) |
Method | Checks out commits and runs the test | Blames the fix's lines plus |
Speed | Minutes (about log2(N) test runs) | Instant |
Output | First bad commit | Suspect set, intent, lifecycle, completeness, risk |
Confidence | Proof | Strong heuristic |
--bisect "<cmd>" runs a real bisect as an optional confirmation layer, in a throwaway
git worktree so your checkout is never touched. When the first failing commit matches the
blamed suspect, the report stamps it confirmed by git bisect.
Architecture
One normalized context in, one structured JSON result out. The only non-deterministic step is the optional LLM narrative, isolated behind an adapter so the engine runs with no API key.
Two lanes, one engine. Every module writes one slice of the result, so nothing cares whether
the target came from gh, the REST API, local git, or a pasted stack trace. Full module map:
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.
Configuration
The base branch resolves in order: the --base flag, then CULPRIT_BASE, then .culprit.toml
(base = "origin/main"), then HEAD~1. --last forces the latest-commit view.
PR titles and labels use the GitHub CLI when present, or the unauthenticated REST API for public
repos (set GITHUB_TOKEN or GITLAB_TOKEN to raise limits). Deep links cover GitHub, GitLab,
Bitbucket, and Gitea. Blast radius reads imports across JS/TS, Python, Go, Java/Kotlin, Ruby,
C/C++, C#, PHP, Rust, Scala, and Swift.
Contributing
pip install -e ".[dev]" && pytestModule map and data shapes: docs/ARCHITECTURE.md. Publishing the MCP
server to the registries: docs/PUBLISHING.md. MIT licensed.
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/noordeen123/culprit'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server