The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: `search` discovers relevant pages via semantic search, while `fetch_content` reads a single known URL as markdown. Descriptions reinforce the boundary (search returns multiple items, fetch returns one item), leaving little room for misselection.

Both names are lowercase snake_case and readable, but `search` is a bare verb while `fetch_content` follows the verb_noun pattern. This is a minor deviation from a consistent scheme rather than a real inconsistency.

Two tools sit just under the typical 3-15 range, but they map exactly to the only two things a web retrieval server needs: discover and read. Nothing appears redundant or missing at the tool-count level, though a slightly larger surface could still be justified.

The core read-the-web lifecycle (find pages, then extract their content) is fully covered with a sensible fallback path. Gaps are minor conveniences such as batch fetching, crawling/site mapping, or structured extraction, which agents can work around by issuing multiple calls.