MCP Chrome Google Search
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Chrome Google Search
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides a direct bridge between Claude and an authenticated Chrome session, enabling fetch requests with session cookies and JavaScript execution within live web pages.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables web searching through Google, DuckDuckGo, and Bing using a headless Chrome browser, returning structured results with titles, URLs, and snippets. Also supports fetching and extracting text content from any webpage.13MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables controlling a real Chrome browser from MCP hosts like Claude, with extension-based or CDP fallback, supporting tabs, navigation, interaction, and page reading tools.39197 npm6MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Large Language Models to perform real-time web searches using Google Custom Search API. Integrates with Claude Desktop to retrieve current information from the internet.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that drives the user's real signed-in Chrome on macOS via AppleScript (Apple Events). 32 tools covering tab/window control, navigation, DOM extraction, form interaction, and arbitrary JS execution. Same engine as the familiar Claude Code skill in the repository.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTransforms Chrome browser into an AI-controlled automation tool that allows AI assistants like Claude to access browser functionality, enabling complex automation, content analysis, and semantic search while preserving your existing browser environment.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: web_fetch extracts content from a specific webpage, while web_search performs web searches and returns result pages. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool based on the task.
Both tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with a clear verb-noun structure: web_fetch and web_search. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a Google Search domain, which typically involves more operations like advanced filtering, image search, or history management. While the tools cover basic fetch and search, the scope is limited and could benefit from additional functionality to fully represent the domain.
The tools cover core search and content extraction, but there are notable gaps for a Google Search server, such as no tools for image search, news search, or handling search settings. Agents can perform basic tasks but may encounter dead ends for more advanced operations, indicating incomplete coverage of the domain.