Skip to main content
Glama
kud
by kud

TypeScript Node.js npm MIT

MCP server for opencode — query github-copilot models via a persistent opencode server.

Website · Documentation

Features

  • Zero API key — routes prompts through a locally running opencode server, so no provider credentials are needed in your AI client.

  • Multi-model support — any model configured in opencode is available; query GPT-4.1, Claude, Gemini, or any other supported provider.

  • Model filtering — restrict or block models via MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL_ALLOW and MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL_BLOCK environment variables using glob-style patterns.

  • Talk to a live session — list_sessions, send and read let your assistant hold a conversation with a running opencode session, such as the one open in your TUI, and the exchange shows up there live.

  • Headless jobs — start_instance, task, wait, list_instances and stop_instance run work on a private opencode server per job, with guard rails (no git push, no credentials, no permission prompts) and a ready-made opencode --server command to watch it live.

  • Auto-start — if opencode's background service is not running, query and list_models start it the same way the TUI does.

  • Session isolation — each query call creates and destroys its own opencode session, so one-off questions leave nothing behind.

  • Works everywhere — compatible with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, VSCode, and any MCP-capable client.

Related MCP server: GPT Proxy MCP Server

Install

npm install -g @kud/mcp-opencode

Requires opencode 2.x (npm i -g @opencode/cli) with at least one provider configured, and Node.js ≥ 20. For opencode 1.x, stay on @kud/mcp-opencode@1.

Usage

Add the server to your MCP client configuration:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "opencode": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@kud/mcp-opencode"]
    }
  }
}

To restrict which models are available, pass environment variables:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "opencode": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@kud/mcp-opencode"],
      "env": {
        "MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL_ALLOW": "github-copilot/*",
        "MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL_BLOCK": "github-copilot/gpt-4o-mini"
      }
    }
  }
}

Talking to a live opencode session

opencode 2 runs one background service that every TUI window shares, and records where it listens (and its password) in its state directory. The MCP reads that registration, so any window you open with a plain opencode is reachable: no ports, no wrapper.

1. Open opencode and say something. opencode only creates a session once you send the first message.

2. Ask your assistant to talk to it. For example: "list my opencode sessions and ask the one in my-project what it thinks of this plan". It calls list_sessions to find the session, send to talk to it, and read to catch up on its history. Messages appear live in the window, and you can reply there yourself.

A window started with opencode --standalone runs a private server with a throwaway password, so the MCP cannot reach it. To use a server of your own instead of the background service, set MCP_OPENCODE_URL (and MCP_OPENCODE_PASSWORD if it has one); a TUI joins that server with opencode --server <url>.

Running headless jobs

For work you want done in the background rather than in a window you are watching, ask your assistant to start an instance and hand it a task. For example: "start an opencode instance in ~/Projects/my-app, have it add a health-check endpoint, and tell me what changed". It calls:

  1. start_instance({ directory }) → { port, url }: a private opencode serve on a free port behind a generated password, separate from the background service your windows use.

  2. task({ port, prompt }) → { session_id, port, attach }: returns at once while the job runs.

  3. wait({ port, session_id }) → status, the last assistant text and the files changed. Call it again if it comes back busy.

  4. stop_instance({ port }) when done. Idle instances are reaped after MCP_OPENCODE_INSTANCE_TTL, and the MCP stops its own instances when it exits.

Guard rails. Nobody is there to answer a permission prompt, so a task's session never gets one: reading, editing and shell commands are allowed, while git push, git remote, gh, npm publish, git reset --hard, web fetches and searches, questions and anything outside the directory are denied. Every deny is set twice: as an opencode permission rule (session and server config) and as a policy, which opencode applies after all rules, so a repository's own opencode config cannot allow it back. The server itself runs with no git credentials (GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT=0, GIT_SSH_COMMAND=false, an empty credential.helper), without GH_TOKEN/GITHUB_TOKEN, and with its model pinned to MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL.

Sandboxing (opt-in OS sandbox). Set MCP_OPENCODE_SANDBOX=srt to wrap each instance's opencode serve in srt (npm i -g @anthropic-ai/sandbox-runtime), enforced by the OS (macOS sandbox-exec, Linux bubblewrap) rather than by opencode's own permissions. Off by default; when the variable is unset everything behaves exactly as before. Any other non-empty value is refused with an error listing the supported values, and if srt is not on PATH the instance fails to start rather than running unsandboxed.

The server generates an srt settings file per instance (kept in a temp dir under the state dir, removed on stop_instance) and passes it as srt --settings <file> opencode serve … — always explicit, so a stray ~/.srt-settings.json can never decide the policy. The generated file allows writes only to the instance directory (realpath), its git dir(s) (both --git-common-dir and --git-dir, so worktrees work), opencode's own data/config/cache/state dirs (XDG-aware, so provider auth keeps working) and the temp dir; denies reads of credential paths (~/.ssh, ~/.aws, ~/.config/gh, ~/.gnupg, ~/.netrc, ~/.npmrc, **/.env, **/.env.*, ~/Library/Keychains, ~/.config/gcloud, ~/.kube, ~/.docker/config.json, and the background service's service.json files, which hold its password); and allows only these network destinations plus local binding for the server's own port: opencode.ai, *.opencode.ai, models.dev, api.githubcopilot.com, github.com, *.github.com, api.github.com, registry.npmjs.org, localhost, 127.0.0.1.

Sandboxed instances also get extra shell denies merged into their opencode permission config (session ruleset and OPENCODE_CONFIG_CONTENT alike): rm -rf*, sudo *, curl *|* and wget *|*. These are deny, never ask — a headless session cannot answer and would hang — and they are heuristic glob matches, a second layer behind the OS sandbox, not a guarantee. The opencode.ai / *.opencode.ai / api.githubcopilot.com entries were verified against the opencode 2.1.2 binary's strings (Zen API, model registry at models.opencode.ai, Copilot provider); models.dev, the 1.x registry, is kept for older lookups; the rest are assumed useful for public clones and npm installs. Non-existent allowWrite entries are dropped when the file is written, so a missing opencode dir cannot break the wrap on any platform.

This is defence in depth, not a guarantee: it raises the cost of escape and of credential or network misuse, but a determined agent inside the sandbox still has the instance directory, git, and whatever the allowlist permits. Combine it with the guard rails above and review what jobs do.

Model fallback. A job tries [its model, ...MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL_FALLBACK] once each, in order. When the session stays in retry for MCP_OPENCODE_RETRY_TIMEOUT_SECONDS (default 90) or its run ends in a provider error (a provider.* error type, or model not found), the watchdog interrupts it, switches the session's model and re-prompts the same session on the next model, so history and worktree edits carry over. When the list is exhausted the job settles as error. wait and list_instances report the current model and the fallbacks taken ({ from, to, reason, at }), and wait reports retry as its own status.

Watching or stepping in. Paste the attach command from task into a terminal. It opens the session in the TUI against the instance, with the instance's password:

OPENCODE_PASSWORD=… opencode --server http://127.0.0.1:53817 --session ses_…

Instance registry

Instances are recorded in ~/.local/state/mcp-opencode/instances.json (or $MCP_OPENCODE_STATE_DIR/instances.json). Other tools may read it directly; this shape is a stable contract:

[
  {
    "runtime": "opencode", // always "opencode" for now
    "sandbox": "srt", // "srt" when OS-sandboxed, else null
    "port": 53817, // where the server listens, on 127.0.0.1
    "pid": 41234, // the opencode serve process (or the srt wrapper, when sandboxed)
    "mcpPid": 41200, // the mcp-opencode process that started it
    "directory": "/Users/me/Projects/my-app",
    "startedAt": "2026-10-02T12:04:34.453Z",
    "password": "…", // basic-auth password (user "opencode") for the server
    // one entry per task, appended when task starts it
    "sessions": [
      {
        "id": "ses_…",
        "title": "add health check",
        "model": "github-copilot/gpt-4.1",
        "startedAt": "2026-10-02T12:04:35.021Z",
        // model switches so far, oldest first; empty until one happens
        "fallbacks": [
          {
            "from": "github-copilot/gpt-4.1",
            "to": "github-copilot/gpt-5",
            "reason": "retry timeout after 90s (attempt 3: rate limited)",
            "at": "2026-10-02T12:06:05.111Z",
          },
        ],
      },
    ],
  },
]

Live state (busy or idle, last activity) is deliberately not in the file: read it from the server at http://127.0.0.1:<port> with the row's password. The file is written owner-only (0600) because it holds those passwords; list_instances leaves them out. A sandboxed row also carries an internal sandboxSettingsDir with the generated srt settings file; it is cleaned up on stop and is not part of the contract.

Environment variables

Variable

Default

Purpose

MCP_OPENCODE_URL

the background service

Use this opencode server for everything instead of the background service and its discovery

MCP_OPENCODE_PASSWORD

none

Password for MCP_OPENCODE_URL, when that server has one

MCP_OPENCODE_SEND_TIMEOUT

600

Seconds send waits for a reply before handing back and letting you read it later

MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL

github-copilot/gpt-4.1

Model query uses when none is passed

MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL_ALLOW

all

Comma-separated models or provider/* patterns query may use

MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL_BLOCK

none

Comma-separated models or patterns to block. Filters apply to query, list_models and a model passed to send; without one, send uses the session's own model

MCP_OPENCODE_MODEL_FALLBACK

none

Ordered, comma-separated fallback models (provider/model) a headless job tries in order after its chosen model when that model stalls or fails. Filtered by the allow/block filters; disallowed entries are dropped

MCP_OPENCODE_RETRY_TIMEOUT_SECONDS

90

Seconds a job's session may stay continuously in retry before the watchdog switches it to the next fallback model

MCP_OPENCODE_INSTANCE_TTL

1800

Seconds every session on an instance may sit idle before the reaper stops it

MCP_OPENCODE_STATE_DIR

~/.local/state/mcp-opencode

Where the instance registry (instances.json) and instance logs live

MCP_OPENCODE_SANDBOX

unset (off)

srt wraps headless instances in an OS sandbox via srt (npm i -g @anthropic-ai/sandbox-runtime); any other non-empty value fails start_instance

MCP_OPENCODE_SANDBOX_SETTINGS

generated

Path to an srt settings file used as --settings verbatim instead of the generated one (must exist; implies srt)

Available tools

Tool

Description

query

Send a prompt to an opencode model. Accepts prompt (required) and model (optional, default: github-copilot/gpt-4.1).

list_models

List models available through the running opencode server. Accepts an optional provider filter (e.g. anthropic).

list_sessions

List sessions on the background service and on headless instances, most recent first, with the port(s) each is served on. Accepts an optional directory filter.

send

Send a message to an existing session and return the reply. Accepts session_id, prompt, and optional agent, model (allowlist-checked; either switches the session for later turns too, as picking it in the TUI does), port and timeout_seconds. Routes to the server that owns the session. Never creates or deletes sessions.

read

Read a session's recent messages as a condensed transcript. Accepts session_id and optional limit (default 20) and port.

start_instance

Start a private headless opencode server in directory. Returns { port, url }.

task

Start a job on an instance: port, prompt, optional model (allowlist-checked), agent (default build) and title. Tries [model, ...fallbacks] in order when a model stalls or fails. Returns { session_id, port, attach } at once.

wait

Wait for a job (port, session_id, timeout_seconds up to 570). Returns status (idle, busy, retry or error), the current model, the fallbacks taken so far, last assistant text and changed files (diffed across the whole session, fallback re-prompts included).

list_instances

Reap, then list registered instances with their task sessions' live status, current model and fallbacks.

stop_instance

Interrupt busy sessions, stop the server on port and confirm the port has closed.

Development

git clone https://github.com/kud/mcp-opencode.git
cd mcp-opencode
npm install
npm run build
npm test

Use the local .mcp.json to connect Claude Code to your dev build, or npm run inspect to open the MCP Inspector against the compiled output.

Script

Purpose

npm run dev

Run from source via tsx

npm run build

Compile TypeScript to dist/

npm test

Run the Vitest test suite

npm run inspect

Open MCP Inspector against the built server

📚 Full documentation → mcp-opencode/docs

Available Tools

2 tools
list_modelsA

List models available for use. Without a provider, returns providers with model counts. Pass a provider name to list its models. Respects allow/block filters (allow: all).

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
providerNoProvider name to filter by (e.g. 'anthropic', 'openai'). Omit to list all providers.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It mentions that the tool respects allow/block filters and has a conditional return based on provider. Missing details on authentication, rate limits, or performance implications, but covers the main behavioral aspects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. The first sentence immediately states the purpose, and the rest adds conditionally relevant detail. Efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description sufficiently explains the different return structures (providers with counts or models). It is complete for a simple listing tool, though a bit more detail on the return format could help.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% but the description adds nuance by explaining the effect of omitting vs providing the parameter (providers with counts vs specific models), going beyond the schema's basic description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists models and specifies two behaviors: without provider it returns providers with model counts, with provider it lists its models. This is specific and distinguishes it from sibling 'query'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context on when to use each mode (with or without provider) and mentions allow/block filters. However, it does not explicitly contrast with sibling 'query' or state when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

queryA

Send a prompt to an opencode model. Defaults to github-copilot/gpt-4.1. Filters — allow: all. Use list_models to see what's available.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
modelNoModel to use in provider/model format (default: github-copilot/gpt-4.1)
promptYesThe prompt to send

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It mentions default model and filter behavior ('allow: all'), but does not disclose if the tool is read-only or destructive, rate limits, or auth needs. Adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. Front-loaded with the core action, then defaults and sibling reference.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 2 params and no output schema, description covers purpose, default, and a hint to sibling. Lacks mention of response format or error handling, but sufficient for basic usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, description adds default value for model and specifies format (provider/model). The prompt parameter is clear. Adds meaningful context beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Send a prompt to an opencode model', specifies the resource and action, and provides the default model. Distinguishes from sibling list_models by directing to it for viewing available models.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to use list_models to see available models, providing a when-to-use alternative. Does not specify when not to use query, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 2 tool updatesv1.1.1
    • First observedlist_models
    • First observedquery

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools are clearly distinct: 'query' sends a prompt to a model, while 'list_models' retrieves available models. No ambiguity or overlap in their purposes.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names use a consistent verb or verb_noun pattern ('query', 'list_models'). The naming is clear and predictable.

Tool Count3/5

With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal but not unreasonable for a simple query-and-list interface. However, the scope seems narrow for a full model interaction server.

Completeness3/5

The server covers basic querying and model listing, but lacks tools for configuration (e.g., setting filters or providers) or advanced features like streaming or model metadata details. Notable gaps exist.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers