Skip to main content
Glama
NORTHTEKDevs

GENOME MCP Server

by NORTHTEKDevs

GENOME

Open memory for AI agents. Same answer accuracy as Mem0 — but ~1,000× cheaper to store, runs fully offline, and keeps an auditable record.

License: Apache 2.0 Python 3.11+

Most agent-memory tools (like Mem0) call an LLM on every message to decide what to remember. That's the slow, expensive part — and GENOME's bet is that you don't need it. GENOME just embeds each message locally: no LLM, no API, no network in the write path.

Benchmarked honestly on public datasets (LoCoMo, LongMemEval), GENOME answers just as accurately as Mem0 — while storing memories for a tiny fraction of the cost and running completely offline.

Honest up front: on answer accuracy, GENOME ties Mem0 — we do not claim to beat it there (two independent benchmark runs confirm parity). The advantage is cost, speed, offline operation, and a temporal/auditable record Mem0 can't produce.

GENOME vs Mem0 at a glance

GENOME

Mem0

Answer accuracy (LoCoMo, LongMemEval)

tied

tied

LLM calls to store one message

0

1+

Write speed

~10 ms

~2,000 ms

Runs offline / air-gapped

yes

no (needs an LLM API)

Ingest cost (10k-user deployment)

~$190 / yr

$159k–$1.6M / yr

"What was true in March?" (point-in-time)

yes

no

Deterministic, auditable memory

yes

no

Every number is measured within one harness — same responder, judge, embedder, and top-k; only the memory layer changes — with paired significance tests. Full detail and per-number provenance: benchmarks/RESULTS.md. Formatted report: benchmarks/GENOME-LoCoMo-Report.pdf.

Related MCP server: MCP Memento

Why it's ~1,000× cheaper: it never calls an LLM to remember

Storing one message costs one LLM call in Mem0, zero in GENOME (just a local embedding). That's not a benchmark you can argue with — it's arithmetic, and it holds no matter which LLM you price it against. At 10,000 users × 50 messages/day (15M messages/month):

Model Mem0 uses to extract

Mem0's yearly ingest bill

GENOME

Claude Haiku

$1,601,757

$190

gpt-4o-mini

$238,596

$190

cheapest hosted model

$159,064

$190

The gap survives the cheapest model and grows in production (Mem0 re-sends stored memories to the LLM as the store fills). Reproduce: python benchmarks/tco_project.py (no API key).

It runs air-gapped

GENOME's default embedder is local. We proved the write path is genuinely offline by blocking all network during writes — they still succeed:

  • ~10 ms/message, 0 network calls, 0 LLM calls (python benchmarks/local_writepath.py)

  • Mem0 can't do this — it needs an LLM API call to ingest.

That makes GENOME usable on-prem, in regulated environments, or fully offline. It's a yes/no capability, not a price point.

How it works

  • Write: embed the message locally and store it. No LLM, no network. (~10 ms)

  • Read: vector search over your memories, with an optional local cross-encoder reranker for harder queries.

  • Optional bi-temporal layer: track how facts change over time and answer "what was true at time T" — see below.

Install

Until the PyPI release lands, install from source:

pip install "git+https://github.com/NORTHTEKDevs/genome.git"

(pip install genome-memory is coming.) The default embedder is local (sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2) — no API key, works offline; the first run downloads the ~90 MB model once. OpenAI embeddings are optional for higher-dimensional retrieval.

Quickstart (fully local, no API key)

from genome import Memory

mem = Memory(storage="genome.db")   # local embedder by default; ":memory:" for ephemeral

# Store a message -- embedded locally, no LLM call, no network
mem.add("Ada met Lin at the robotics summit in Berlin.", user_id="u1")
mem.add("They are collaborating on an open-source planning library.", user_id="u1")

# Retrieve the most relevant memories
for hit in mem.search("Where did Ada meet Lin?", user_id="u1", limit=5):
    print(f"{hit.score:.3f}  {hit.content}")

Memory mirrors Mem0's API (add / search / get / delete / reset) — a near drop-in swap. To use OpenAI embeddings instead (set OPENAI_API_KEY):

from genome import Memory, EmbeddingProvider
mem = Memory(storage="genome.db",
             embedding_provider=EmbeddingProvider(model_name="openai:text-embedding-3-small"))

Use it as an MCP server (fully-local memory for any agent)

GENOME ships an MCP server, so any MCP client (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, …) gets persistent cross-session memory that runs entirely on the local machine — no LLM calls, no API keys, no data leaves the box. Most memory MCPs can't say that.

Install with the mcp extra, then add it to your client's config:

pip install "genome-memory[mcp] @ git+https://github.com/NORTHTEKDevs/genome.git"
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "genome": { "command": "genome-mcp" }
  }
}

Tools the agent gets: remember (store a fact/preference, local + 0 LLM), recall (semantic search), forget (delete the memory matching a query), reset_memories (clear a user's memories). Memories persist in ~/.genome/memories.db (override with the GENOME_MCP_DB env var). Run standalone with genome-mcp or python -m genome.mcp.server.

The honest results

Same responder + judge + embedder for every system; only the memory layer changes.

What we measured

Result

Verdict

Answer accuracy, in-window (LoCoMo)

GENOME 0.851 vs Mem0 0.855 (p > 0.23)

Tied

Answer accuracy, harder bench (LongMemEval, n=90 & n=205)

directionally ahead, not significant (p = 0.14–0.19)

Tied

Accuracy when history overflows the context window

+0.409 at 80× less context (p = 8e-10)

Win

Cost to store a message

0 LLM calls vs 1+; 837–8,433× cheaper

Win

Write path

~10 ms, air-gapped, 0 network calls

Win

Point-in-time ("what was true at T")

belief-state 0.870 vs Mem0 0.676 (synthetic data)

Win, with caveat

Retrieval hit-rate with reranking

improves hit@10 (up to 0.943); local + free

Win

What we tested that didn't help (so you don't have to)

We publish our nulls — it's how you know the wins are real:

  • Synthesis / consolidation: accuracy-neutral at equal token budget (p = 0.86).

  • Hybrid (BM25 + dense) and graph retrieval: hybrid underperformed plain dense on LoCoMo; graph was not validated here.

  • Reranking's accuracy gain is embedder-dependent: it reliably improves retrieval hit-rate, but its effect on final answer accuracy depends on the embedder — treat it as a retrieval-quality tool, not a guaranteed accuracy win.

Bi-temporal memory: "what was true at time T"

GENOME can track how facts change over time and answer point-in-time questions — something overwrite-based memory structurally can't do (it only keeps the latest value):

from genome.memory.belief import ingest_belief_turn, answer_belief_context

mem = Memory(storage="genome.db", llm_call=my_llm_fn)

# facts land at their DOMAIN time (parsed from the text), not wall-clock ingest time
ingest_belief_turn(mem, "In March 2024, Jordan moved to Seattle.", session_time=t0, user_id="u")
ingest_belief_turn(mem, "Jordan just moved to Austin.", session_time=t2, user_id="u")

answer_belief_context(mem, "Where does Jordan live now?", user_id="u")            # -> Austin
answer_belief_context(mem, "Where did Jordan live in early 2024?", user_id="u")   # -> Seattle
answer_belief_context(mem, "List every city Jordan has lived in.", user_id="u")   # -> Seattle; Austin

On the TempBelief benchmark it answers as-of queries at 0.870 vs Mem0's 0.676, with the knowledge graph audited at 0.97 precision / 0.96 recall. Caveat: TempBelief is synthetic text with explicit dates; the edge shrinks on natural speech. Real capability, bounded proof.

Optional features

Opt-in; the default path stays LLM-free and local at ingest.

mem = Memory(
    storage="genome.db",
    llm_call=my_llm_fn,             # LLM-based fact extraction on add()
    resolve_conflicts=True,         # ADD/UPDATE/DELETE vs existing memories
    auto_extract_entities=True,     # entity graph for graph retrieval
    auto_consolidate_threshold=200, # summarize-or-prune when a scope grows past N
)
mem.search("...", user_id="u1", mode="hybrid")   # modes: "dense" (default), "hybrid", "graph"

Reranking (local, free, no API):

from genome.memory.rerank import CrossEncoderReranker
mem = Memory(storage="genome.db", reranker=CrossEncoderReranker())   # lazy-loaded
mem.search("Where did the user go on vacation?", user_id="u1", limit=5)  # reranked

Reproduce the benchmarks

The LoCoMo and LongMemEval datasets are not bundled (they carry their own licenses — LoCoMo is CC BY-NC 4.0). See benchmarks/data/README.md to download them. The first two lines need no dataset and no API keys:

python benchmarks/local_writepath.py        # local write path: ~10ms/msg, 0 network
python benchmarks/tco_project.py            # deployment cost projection
python benchmarks/verdict.py                # in-window accuracy + McNemar
python benchmarks/haystack_report.py        # overflow / context-window crossover
python benchmarks/ingest_cost.py --n 80     # measured ingestion cost vs Mem0
python benchmarks/lme_qa.py --n 90          # LongMemEval head-to-head vs Mem0
python benchmarks/tempbelief_run.py --convs 6   # bi-temporal point-in-time vs baselines

License

Apache License 2.0 — see LICENSE and NOTICE.

GENOME is free and open source: read it, modify it, self-host it, and embed it in your own applications — commercial use included — under the terms of Apache 2.0. Questions: info@northtek.io.

Copyright 2026 Northtek (FrostByte Digital LLC).

A
license - permissive license
-
quality - not tested
C
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NORTHTEKDevs/genome'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server