fugu-mcp
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@fugu-mcpAsk Fugu to review this code for potential bugs."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
fugu-mcp
An MCP server that exposes Sakana Fugu — an OpenAI-compatible orchestration LLM — as on-demand tools inside Claude Code. Use it to pull a second opinion or run a small multi-model panel on a discrete, self-contained subproblem, without leaving your Claude Code session.
Fugu is a tool, not the driver. This does not make Fugu the main model for Claude Code. Claude Code only drives on Anthropic / Bedrock / Vertex / Foundry models. fugu-mcp lets the Claude main loop call out to Fugu on demand — it is a narrow tool, not a model swap.
What you get
Two tools, both backed by Sakana's POST /v1/chat/completions endpoint:
Tool | Use it for |
| A general second opinion on a hard, self-contained question (tricky algorithm, design trade-off, "is my approach sound?"). |
| A review-shaped critique: hand it |
Plus a /fugu slash command for manual invocation.
Related MCP server: codex-cli-mcp-tool
Install
Requires Node 20+ (Node 26 recommended; uses native fetch).
git clone https://github.com/<your-org>/fugu-mcp.git
cd fugu-mcp
npm install
npm run build # tsc -> dist/
export SAKANA_API_KEY=... # your real key; never commit it
# run from the repo root so $(pwd) resolves to your clone
claude mcp add fugu -- node "$(pwd)/dist/index.js"Then in Claude Code, e.g.: "Ask Fugu to cross-check this approach."
claude mcp add inherits your shell environment, so the exported SAKANA_API_KEY (and any FUGU_* overrides) flow through to the server.
Alternative: .mcp.json
To check the registration into a project (so collaborators get it automatically), add a .mcp.json at the repo root instead of running claude mcp add. A ready-to-edit template lives at .mcp.json.example:
{
"mcpServers": {
"fugu": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["dist/index.js"],
"env": {
"SAKANA_API_KEY": "REPLACE_WITH_YOUR_SAKANA_API_KEY",
"FUGU_BASE_URL": "https://api.sakana.ai/v1",
"FUGU_DEFAULT_MODEL": "fugu-ultra",
"FUGU_TIMEOUT_MS": "120000"
}
}
}
}Do not commit a real
SAKANA_API_KEYin.mcp.json. Either keep.mcp.jsonout of version control, or leave the placeholder and set the real key via the environment (the server readsprocess.env.SAKANA_API_KEYregardless of where the session is launched).
argsuses a relativedist/index.js; this resolves against the directory Claude Code is launched from. Use an absolute path (/path/to/fugu-mcp/dist/index.js) if you run sessions from elsewhere.
Use with OpenClaw
OpenClaw supports MCP natively, so the same server works there — no separate build. After npm run build:
openclaw mcp add fugu \
--command node \
--arg "/path/to/fugu-mcp/dist/index.js" \
--env SAKANA_API_KEY=your_key_hereopenclaw mcp add probes the server before saving. Confirm with openclaw mcp list, and the ask_fugu / fugu_second_opinion tools become available to your OpenClaw agents. Run openclaw mcp reload after changing config so the new settings take effect on the next turn.
Tools
ask_fugu
A general second opinion / hard self-contained query. The prompt must contain everything Fugu needs — it cannot see your repo, files, or the current conversation.
Argument | Type | Required | Default | Notes |
| string | yes | — | The full, self-contained problem or question. |
| string | no | — | Steer Fugu's role/behavior. |
|
| no |
| Pick a specific model. |
| integer > 0 | no |
| Max output tokens. |
Example invocation:
{
"name": "ask_fugu",
"arguments": {
"prompt": "I'm choosing between a single-writer WAL and a per-shard log for a 50k-writes/sec ledger. Walk through the durability/throughput trade-offs and recommend one. Assume NVMe and fsync-per-commit.",
"system_prompt": "You are a senior distributed-systems engineer.",
"model": "fugu-ultra",
"max_tokens": 1500
}
}In conversation you can just say: "Use ask_fugu to sanity-check this proof."
fugu_second_opinion
A review-shaped critique. Wraps a skeptical-senior-reviewer system prompt internally, so you only supply the material and the question.
Argument | Type | Required | Default | Notes |
| string | yes | — | The material to review: code, a diff, an answer, a design, or a plan. |
| string | yes | — | What you want assessed. |
|
| no |
| Pick a specific model. |
Example invocation:
{
"name": "fugu_second_opinion",
"arguments": {
"content": "func transfer(from, to *Account, amt int) {\n from.mu.Lock(); to.mu.Lock()\n from.bal -= amt; to.bal += amt\n from.mu.Unlock(); to.mu.Unlock()\n}",
"question": "Is this concurrency-safe?",
"model": "fugu-ultra"
}
}In conversation: "Get a fugu_second_opinion on this diff — is the error handling complete?"
/fugu slash command
/fugu <your question> routes your text to ask_fugu and asks Claude to summarize Fugu's answer and note where it agrees or disagrees — treating Fugu as one voice in a panel, not ground truth. See .claude/commands/fugu.md.
Configuration (environment variables)
All config is via env. Copy .env.example to .env for local use (.env is gitignored).
Variable | Required | Default | Purpose |
| yes (at call time) | — | Sent as |
| no |
| OpenAI-compatible base URL. Requests go to |
| no |
| Model used when a tool call omits |
| no |
| Per-request timeout in milliseconds. Orchestrators are slow; the default is generous. |
A malformed FUGU_BASE_URL (not a URL) or non-positive FUGU_TIMEOUT_MS fails fast at startup with a clear message. A missing key does not.
Hooks (for working on this repo)
This repo ships .claude/settings.json with hooks that keep the build green and guard secrets while you edit fugu-mcp itself:
PreToolUse on
Write | Edit | Bash→ runsscripts/guard-secrets.sh, which scans the payload for an API-key pattern and blocks the operation if a real-looking key is detected (so a key can't be written into a file or slipped into a commit).PostToolUse on
Edit | Write | MultiEdit→ runsnpm run typecheck(non-blocking; keeps types green during edits).
These hooks are for development of fugu-mcp; they are not required to use the MCP server in another project.
MCP_TIMEOUT for the consuming session
Fugu calls can take tens of seconds (up to ~120s). Claude Code's default MCP startup/tool timeout can be too short. In the session that consumes this server, set:
export MCP_TIMEOUT=120000This raises Claude Code's MCP timeout to match the server's own FUGU_TIMEOUT_MS default, so slow Fugu responses aren't cut off.
Standalone vs integrated
Use Fugu standalone when: you want a one-shot answer and you're happy outside Claude Code. Drive Sakana's OpenAI-compatible API directly from Codex, Cursor, or curl. That path is simpler and avoids a hop.
Use this MCP tool when: you're already mid-task in Claude Code and want a narrow second opinion — a different model's take on a discrete, self-contained subproblem — without breaking flow. fugu-mcp is deliberately small: two tools, second-opinion shaped, no repo access.
Trade-offs to keep in mind:
Latency. Going through the Claude orchestrator adds a hop, and Fugu itself is slow (tens of seconds, occasionally up to ~120s). It is not for tight iteration loops.
Cost. Fugu output is roughly ~$30 / 1M output tokens.
max_tokensdefaults are kept modest (ask_fugudefaults to 2000); keep prompts and outputs tight.Region. Sakana's API is blocked in the EU/EEA. If you're in that region you won't be able to call it.
Model IDs. This server defaults to
fugu-ultraand exposesfugu/fugu-ultra. Verify the exact, current Fugu model IDs and endpoint against the Sakana docs — they can change. If they differ, it's a config edit (FUGU_DEFAULT_MODEL,FUGU_BASE_URL), not a code change.
Development
npm run build # compile TypeScript to dist/
npm run typecheck # tsc --noEmit
npm test # vitest run (mocked fetch; no network, no key needed)
npm start # node dist/index.js (stdio server)Available Tools
2 toolsask_fuguAsk Fugu (second opinion)A
Ask Sakana Fugu (a separate orchestration LLM) for a second opinion on a HARD, SELF-CONTAINED problem, or to cross-check your own reasoning with a different model. Good for: a tricky algorithm/proof, a thorny design trade-off, a 'is my approach sound?' gut-check, or a multi-model panel on a discrete question. The prompt MUST contain all needed context — Fugu cannot see the repo, files, or this conversation. Do NOT use it for interactive or iterative repo work, multi-step edits, running commands, or anything that needs to read/modify local files — do that yourself. Calls can be slow (tens of seconds).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | Yes | The full, self-contained problem or question to send to Fugu. Include all context Fugu needs — it cannot see your repo or conversation. | |
| system_prompt | No | Optional system prompt to steer Fugu's role/behavior (e.g. 'You are a senior distributed-systems engineer.'). | |
| model | No | Fugu model id. Omit to use the server's default (FUGU_DEFAULT_MODEL). | |
| max_tokens | No | Max output tokens. Defaults to 2000. |
fugu_second_opinionFugu second opinion (review)A
Get a rigorous SECOND OPINION from Sakana Fugu (a separate LLM) on a discrete piece of work. Provide the content to review (code, diff, answer, design, or plan) and a specific question. Fugu acts as a skeptical senior reviewer and returns concrete issues, risks, and improvements. Best for cross-checking your own output with a different model on a self-contained artifact. All needed context must be in content — Fugu cannot see the repo or this conversation. Do NOT use it for interactive/iterative repo work or anything needing local file access. Calls can be slow.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| content | Yes | The material to review: code, a diff, a written answer, a design, or a plan. Include everything Fugu needs to judge it — it has no other context. | |
| question | Yes | What you want Fugu to assess (e.g. 'Is this concurrency-safe?', 'Does this proof hold?', 'Is this API design sound?'). | |
| model | No | Fugu model id. Omit to use the server's default (FUGU_DEFAULT_MODEL). |
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
v0.1.0- First observed
ask_fugu - First observed
fugu_second_opinion
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
Both tools serve essentially the same purpose—getting a second opinion from Sakana Fugu. The descriptions differ slightly in phrasing but offer the same core functionality, making it unclear when to use one versus the other.
Tool names are inconsistent: 'ask_fugu' follows a verb_noun pattern, while 'fugu_second_opinion' uses a noun_adjective pattern. Mixed naming conventions reduce predictability.
With only two tools covering a single niche (second opinions), the set feels unnecessarily thin. The functionality could easily be served by one well-designed tool.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for any meaningful server scope. Not only is there no variety of operations, but the two tools overlap almost entirely, leaving no discernible domain coverage beyond a single redundant capability.
Related MCP Connectors
Augments MCP Server - A comprehensive framework documentation provider for Claude Code
Shared memory MCP server for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI and Cursor. Cited, editable.
An MCP server that gives your AI access to the source code and docs of all public github repos
MCP server for progressive tool usage at any scale (see https://klavis.ai)
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides agentic code review powered by OpenAI-compatible models, designed for use with Claude Code.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows Claude Code to interact with the OpenAI Codex CLI.38 npm20MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server enabling Claude to consult Codex (GPT-5.x) mid-task for second opinions, plan/diff review, brainstorming, and codebase exploration via structured debates and permission-controlled interactions.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets Claude Code delegate coding tasks such as code generation, review, refactoring, and test writing to a local Ollama instance running a Qwen3 model.9MIT