🎬 slugline-mcp

Brutal, evidence-based screenplay analysis — grounded in real produced scripts.

Mood, next-action suggestions, and "X meets Y" comparisons, backed by retrieval over ~2,200 real screenplays. One MCP server. Zero vibes-based feedback.

Under the hood: a full Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline — chunking, vector embeddings, semantic search, and local zero-shot classification — exposed entirely as Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools, with zero LLM calls from the server itself.

slugline-mcp doesn't write or judge your scene itself — it retrieves real produced scenes similar to yours (or matching a mood you're chasing) so your own connected Claude can ground its feedback in evidence instead of guessing. It's the retrieval half of RAG, full stop: parse, embed, index, and semantically search real screenplays, then hand that grounded evidence to Claude over MCP.

⭐ Star this repo if you find it useful.

Try it:

• 📦 Install it — uvx slugline-mcp (or uv pip install slugline-mcp), published on PyPI

• 🔌 Add it to Claude Desktop — see docs/claude_desktop.md for the config

• 🎬 Ask about your scene — "Find me real scenes similar to this one: [paste a scene]" and Claude answers grounded in actual retrieved screenplay text, not general knowledge

Note: retrieval needs a populated reference index, and a prebuilt one isn't published yet — see docs/dataset.md to build one locally. Until then, tools return empty results rather than crashing (see If retrieval comes back empty).

🎥 Demo

A screen recording is still coming (see the roadmap below), but docs/demo_walkthrough.md has a full text walkthrough with real tool output — including both the precise tag-matched and semantic-fallback paths of find_mood_reference_scenes — captured against an actual local test index, not fabricated.

Related MCP server: Seroost Search MCP Server

🎯 What is this?

slugline-mcp is an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for screenwriters. It's a retrieval-only RAG pipeline: it parses a reference database of real movie screenplays into scenes, embeds them, and exposes semantic search over that index as MCP tools. The LLM doing the actual writing and judgment is your own Claude, connected locally — this server never calls out to an LLM itself, it just supplies the evidence.

Two engineering ideas this project is built around:

• RAG, done properly: real chunking (screenplay scenes, not arbitrary token windows), a purpose-fit embedding model, a persistent vector store, and metadata filtering (mood tags computed once at index time) layered on top of semantic similarity — not just "stuff everything into a prompt."

• MCP, done properly: five tools with schemas an LLM can actually reason about (Annotated[..., Field(description=...)] throughout tools/), including a dedicated get_analysis_style tool whose whole job is steering how the calling LLM uses the other four — prompt engineering expressed as a callable tool, not a static system prompt.

Reference data comes from rohitsaxena/MovieSum, a public Hugging Face dataset of ~2,200 movie screenplays, pre-structured into scenes with dialogue and stage directions.

🧠 How the RAG Pipeline Works

Index time (once, offline, in indexing/build_index.py):

1. Parse — MovieSum's screenplay XML (or a user's raw pasted script, via a separate plain-text splitter) is split into scenes, not arbitrary chunks — a scene is the natural retrieval unit for screenplay feedback.

2. Embed — each scene's flattened text is encoded with sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 into a 384-dim vector.

3. Classify — each scene is also run once through a local zero-shot classifier (facebook/bart-large-mnli) against a fixed mood taxonomy, so mood becomes a stored metadata field instead of something re-inferred on every query.

4. Store — vectors + text + metadata land in a persistent Chroma collection.

Query time (every MCP tool call, in retrieval.py):

1. The incoming query (a scene, or a target mood) is embedded with the same model.

2. Chroma runs approximate nearest-neighbor search over the stored vectors — optionally pre-filtered by metadata (e.g. mood == "paranoid") before ranking by similarity.

3. Results are formatted into a canonical scene shape and returned as MCP tool output — raw evidence, not a generated answer.

Retrieval and generation are fully decoupled here: this server only ever does the retrieval half, and the MCP tool boundary is exactly where that handoff happens.

✨ Features

• search_similar_scenes — semantic search for real produced scenes structurally or tonally similar to a scene you're writing

• get_scene_details — fetch the full text and metadata for one indexed scene by id

• list_indexed_movies — enumerate every movie currently in the reference index

• find_mood_reference_scenes — find scenes that strongly hit a target mood (e.g. "paranoid"), for when you want to rewrite toward a mood your scene doesn't have yet — a hybrid search: free-text moods close to a precoded tag get precise tag-filtered results, anything else falls back to raw semantic search, with the method used reported back for transparency

• get_analysis_style — instructs the connected LLM to be direct rather than encouraging, to gather evidence before writing anything, and to structure its feedback around mood, next action, and an "X meets Y" comparison — each one cited against specific retrieved scenes

• MovieSum's screenplay XML is parsed into structured Scene objects (slugline, action lines, dialogue, parentheticals); a separate plain-text splitter handles a user's own pasted script, which has no such structure

• Every reference scene is run once through a local, free zero-shot classifier (facebook/bart-large-mnli) at indexing time to tag its dominant mood — no per-query cost, no external API

• Embeddings use sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2, stored in a local Chroma index

• End users never build the index themselves: a bootstrap module downloads a prebuilt index from a Hugging Face Hub dataset repo on first run, falling back to clear "no index available" behavior (never a crash) if that fails

🧰 Tech Stack

⚙️ Getting Started

Prerequisites

• Python 3.11+

• uv

Install

From PyPI:

uv pip install slugline-mcp

From source:

git clone https://github.com/NalluriTanavreddy/slugline-mcp.git
cd slugline-mcp
uv sync

Run the server

uv run python -m slugline_mcp

Add it to Claude Desktop

See docs/claude_desktop.md for the full config example — a uvx slugline-mcp config now that it's published, or a local-checkout config for dev mode.

Build or fetch a reference index

The server needs a populated Chroma index to retrieve from. See docs/dataset.md for building one locally from MovieSum, and src/slugline_mcp/indexing/bootstrap.py for how published builds will fetch a prebuilt one automatically.

Development setup

uv sync --extra index  # adds datasets + transformers, needed only for indexing
uv run --with pytest pytest tests/

See docs/testing.md for testing tools interactively with the MCP Inspector.

📖 Usage

Once slugline-mcp is connected (see Add it to Claude Desktop above), just talk to Claude normally — paste a scene, describe what you're stuck on, or ask for a comparison. Claude decides which tools to call; you never call them directly.

Typical workflow

1. Paste a scene and ask for feedback. Claude calls get_analysis_style first (it's designed to steer the whole interaction), then search_similar_scenes with your scene's text to pull real comparable scenes from the reference index.

2. Claude cites specific movies and scenes, not vague genre talk — if it says "this reads like a beat from 8MM," that's because search_similar_scenes actually returned that scene.

3. Ask to see the full match. "Show me that whole scene" prompts Claude to call get_scene_details with the id from the earlier search result.

4. Ask for a mood rewrite. "Make this scene feel more paranoid" prompts find_mood_reference_scenes("paranoid") — Claude gets back real scenes that strongly hit that mood, plus whether the match was precise (tag_matched) or a broader semantic guess (semantic_fallback).

5. Ask what's in the reference set. "What movies do you have indexed?" calls list_indexed_movies.

Example prompts

Tools reference

If retrieval comes back empty

Every tool degrades gracefully instead of erroring if no reference index is available yet (see retrieval.py) — you'll get empty results rather than a crash. If that happens:

• Confirm a Chroma index exists at ~/.slugline-mcp/chroma (or wherever SLUGLINE_MCP_PERSIST_DIR points).

• If not, either wait for bootstrap.py to fetch the prebuilt index, or build one yourself (see docs/dataset.md).

🗂️ Project Structure

src/slugline_mcp/
├── server.py                       # FastMCP instance, tool registration
├── __main__.py                     # `python -m slugline_mcp` entry point
├── config.py                       # env var loading
├── retrieval.py                    # Chroma-backed retrieval (search, get, mood filter)
├── tools/
│   ├── search_similar_scenes.py
│   ├── get_scene_details.py
│   ├── list_indexed_movies.py
│   ├── get_analysis_style.py
│   ├── find_mood_reference_scenes.py
│   └── _formatting.py              # shared scene response shape
└── indexing/
    ├── parser.py                   # MovieSum XML -> Scene objects
    ├── plaintext_scene_splitter.py # raw pasted scripts -> scenes
    ├── embeddings.py                # sentence-transformers wrapper
    ├── mood_tagging.py              # local zero-shot mood classifier
    ├── chroma_client.py             # Chroma persistent client/collection
    ├── build_index.py               # maintainer script: parse + embed + tag + store
    └── bootstrap.py                 # download prebuilt index from HF Hub

tests/    # pytest suite, one file per tool/module
docs/     # dataset, MCP Inspector testing, Claude Desktop config

🗺️ Roadmap

• Phase 0 — Repo setup: README, license, pyproject.toml, package structure

• Phase 1 — Indexing pipeline: MovieSum XML parser, plain-text splitter, embeddings, Chroma, build_index, local mood tagging, HF Hub bootstrap

• Phase 2 — MCP server core: FastMCP scaffold, entry point, config, retrieval logic

• Phase 3 — Tools: all five tools implemented, registered, and tested

• Phase 4 — Local testing: MCP Inspector docs, schema fixes, graceful empty results, Claude Desktop config, this README

• Phase 5 — Packaging: console entry point, versioning, uvx support

• Phase 6 — CI/CD: GitHub Actions build/test + PyPI publish workflows

• Phase 7 — Docs & release: full usage guide, CONTRIBUTING, demo walkthrough, v0.1.0

• Phase 8 — Publish: TestPyPI, then PyPI

See TASKS.md for the full task-by-task build checklist.

📄 License

MIT — see LICENSE.

👤 Author

Built by NalluriTanavreddy.