Fetch Custom Activities
fetch_custom_activityRetrieve custom activities from the E&A app to track and analyze specific actions.
Instructions
Get custom activities from the E&A app
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
fetch_custom_activityRetrieve custom activities from the E&A app to track and analyze specific actions.
Get custom activities from the E&A app
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true. The description adds no additional behavioral information beyond the purpose, such as whether results are paginated or limited.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Front-loaded with action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description does not explain the return format or structure. While simple, it could be more complete by stating what is returned.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema is empty (no parameters), so schema coverage is 100%. Description adds meaning about source ('E&A app') but does not need to explain parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific verb 'Get' and resource 'custom activities' from 'the E&A app'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'create_custom_activity' and other read tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Since it has no parameters and is a simple fetch-all, usage is implied but not stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mondaycom/mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server