Create View

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are minimal (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). The description adds that it creates a saved view and provides filter operator details. It does not discuss side effects (e.g., triggers, permissions) or response. It is adequate but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: four sentences covering purpose, filter operators, and two clear examples. It is front-loaded with the essential purpose and avoids fluff. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 6 parameters with nested objects and no output schema. The description explains filter operators and examples but omits sorting syntax and return value description. It is largely complete but could include a brief note about the response structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value by listing common filter operators with examples and clarifying that settings for TABLE views should use create_view_table. This enhances parameter understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new board view (tab) with optional filters and sorting.' It identifies the resource (board view) and action (create). However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool create_view_table, though the settings parameter hints at the distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit 'when to use' or 'when not to use' guidance. It implies usage for creating saved views with filters/sorting, but lacks directive like 'prefer create_view_table for TABLE views' in the description itself (that appears only in the schema). No exclusion criteria are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.