Skip to main content
Glama
mondaycom

monday MCP Server

Official
by mondaycom

Create Form

create_form

Create a monday.com form with a backing board to collect and store responses. Returns a form token for future mutations.

Instructions

Create a monday.com form. Also creates a backing board to store responses. Returns the formToken for future mutations.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
destination_workspace_idYes
destination_folder_idNo
destination_folder_nameNo
board_kindNo
destination_nameNoBoard name (stores form responses).
board_owner_idsNo
board_owner_team_idsNo
board_subscriber_idsNoUser IDs to notify on board activity.
board_subscriber_teams_idsNoTeam IDs to notify on board activity.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds that creating a form also creates a backing board, which is not obvious from annotations. It also discloses the return of formToken. Annotations already indicate mutable action (readOnlyHint=false). The description enhances transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and includes key behavioral context and return value. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 9 parameters, low schema coverage, no output schema, and the complexity of creating a form with a backing board, the description is too brief. It fails to explain parameter interdependencies or potential failure modes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 33% (3 of 9 parameters have descriptions). The description does not compensate by explaining any parameter meanings or relationships. Most parameters (e.g., destination_workspace_id, board_kind) remain undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create a monday.com form'), the resource (a form), and the side effect (creates a backing board). It also mentions the return value (formToken). This distinguishes it from siblings like 'create_form_submission' and 'create_board'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_board, create_form_submission). No prerequisites or context for usage are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mondaycom/mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server